PGI logo cropped.png
Congressional Millionaire’s Club
The Personal Gain Index shines a light on how members of Congress benefit during their tenure.





Academic performance

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Policypedia
Education policy logo.jpg

Education policy in the U.S.
Public education in the U.S.

Education statistics
State Education Information
AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming
See also
Academic performance is the measurement of student achievement across various academic subjects. Teachers and education officials typically measure achievement using classroom performance, graduation rates and results from standardized tests.

History

The origins of measuring academic performance in the United States date back to the 1830s. Education advocates Horace Mann and Samuel Gridley Howe used a standardized test to evaluate student progress in Boston. Kansas school administrator Frederick J. Kelly advanced the idea of standardized testing with the Kansas Silent Reading Test in 1914. This multiple-choice test was used to decrease grading time and standardize student evaluations. IBM employee Reynold B. Johnson developed a grading machine in 1934 that could grade test sheets by picking up the electrical current created by pencil marks.[1] Henry Chauncey developed the Scholastic Assessment Test (SAT) in 1934 to evaluate scholarship candidates at Harvard University and University of Iowa Professor E.F. Lindquist created the first version of the American College Test (ACT) in 1959.[2][3]

The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965 encouraged adoption of standardized testing by all states. This legislation required states to measure student proficiency and develop accountability measures for public schools. The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 continued the ESEA's focus on accountability by requiring states to ensure minimum proficiency levels in order to receive federal funds.[4]

Method of measurement

Student performance is measured using grade point average (GPA), high school graduation rate, annual standardized tests and college entrance exams. A student's GPA is typically measured on a scale of zero to four with higher GPAs representing higher grades in the classroom. Graduation rates are collected by state and federal education officials as a baseline measurement of secondary education performance. Each state conducts annual tests at the elementary, middle and high school levels to determine student proficiency in subjects like English and mathematics. These tests are also used to comply with federal education standards.[5] School districts also track student performance on the ACT and SAT to determine readiness for higher education.[6]

Issues

Achievement gap

The measurement of academic performance reveals achievement gaps in public schools based on race, gender and economic circumstances. The National Center for Education Statistics found that African American and Hispanic students fell behind white students by the equivalent of two grade levels on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) assessment between 2009 and 2011.[7] A study by MIT economists David Autor and Melanie Wasserman found that female high school students born in 1975 had a 91 percent graduation rate while male high school students born in the same year had an 88 percent graduation rate.[8] The U.S. Department of Education issued a report in 2011 that found 68 percent of high school seniors in high-poverty schools graduated in 2008 compared to 91 percent of seniors in low-poverty schools.[7]

Differences in state testing

Each state develops a unique K-12 testing process intended to determine student proficiency prior to graduation. State control over standardized testing has led to divergence in academic rigor and proficiency requirements in recent years. The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) found that about 20 percent of states changed annual assessment standards between 2007 and 2009. The NCES determined that 21 of 34 instances where standards were changed led to more rigorous evaluations than previous years. These changes increase the difficulty of assessing changes in academic performance from previous years and comparing state proficiency levels.[5]

See also

External links

BallotpediaAvatar bigger.png
Suggest a link

References