Arizona Sales Tax for Education, Proposition 301 (2000)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Voting on Taxes
Taxes.jpg
Ballot Measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot
Arizona Constitution
Flag of Arizona.png
Preamble
Articles
1234566.178910111213141516171819202122252627282930
Arizona Proposition 301, also known as the Relating to Sales Tax for Education Act, was on the November 7, 2000 election ballot in Arizona as a legislatively-referred state statute. It was approved.[1]

Election results

Sales Tax for Education
ResultVotesPercentage
Approveda Yes 778,807 53.5%
No675,94146.5%

Text of measure

The Summary by Arizona Legislative Council was

Proposition 301 provides for:

1. An increase of six-tenths of one per cent in the rate of state transaction privilege (sales) tax, and an increase of six-tenths of one per cent in the state use tax for twenty years. An increase of six-tenths of one per cent changes the state's current rate from 5.0% to 5.6%. This equates to an increase of 12% to the state's rate. If Proposition 301 passes, state general fund expenditures would be an additional $94.5 million in 2002, increasing annually thereafter. These additional expenditures would not be paid for from the increase in the sales tax. The uses of the new revenue are for the following purposes:

(a) To authorize and pay for issuance of up to $800 million of new school improvement revenue bonds to correct existing deficiencies in school buildings. At 6% interest total principal and debt service will be approximately $1.4 billion over the next 20 years. (b) For universities to invest in technology and research-based initiatives. (c) For community college districts to invest in workforce development programs. (d) For community colleges that are owned, operated or chartered by an Indian tribe for workforce development and job training. (e) For distribution to the state department of education for the phase-in of five additional school days and associated teacher salary increases resulting from an increased number of school days. (f) For distribution to the state department of education for school safety and character education. (g) For distribution to the state department of education for: (1) Developing a system to measure school performance based on student achievement, including student performance on the AIMS test. (2) Developing a statewide computerized database of information on individual students including student attendance and academic performance. Data items collected on individual students will be developed at the discretion of the Department of Education. (h) For distribution to the failing schools tutoring fund. (i) For reimbursement of the state general fund for the cost of income tax credits in mitigation of increased transaction privilege and use taxes for families with an annual income of less than $25,000 and individuals with an annual income of less than $12,500. (j) For increases in teacher base level compensation, teacher compensation based on performance, and maintenance and operation purposes.

2. Automatic inflation adjustments in the state aid to education base level or other components of a school district's revenue control limit.

3. The inclusion of school district excess utility costs within the revenue control limit, beginning in fiscal year 2009-2010.

4. A limitation on the school district qualifying tax rates and the county equalization assistance for education tax rate.[2][3]

See also

BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Suggest a link

External links

References

  1. Arizona 2000 election results
  2. NCSL ballot measure database, accessed December 31, 2013
  3. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.