Note: Ballotpedia will be read-only from 9pm CST on February 25-March 5 while Judgepedia is merged into Ballotpedia.
For status updates, visit lucyburns.org.
Ballotpedia's coverage of elections held on March 3, 2015, was limited. Select races were covered live, and all results will be added once the merger is complete.

Bilovsky v. Deukmejian

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Ballot law
BallotLaw final.png
State laws
Initiative law
Recall law
Statutory changes
Ballot Law Update
Current edition
Court cases
Lawsuit news
Ballot access rulings
Recent court cases
Petitioner access
Ballot title challenges
Superseding initiatives
Signature challenges
Laws governing
local ballot measures
Bilovsky v. Deukmajian is a 1981 decision in the California court of appeals. The plaintiffs were Walter Bilovsky and Raymond Weisberg. The plaintiffs had circulated California Proposition 5 (1978), a measure that would have required the establishment of smoking and no-smoking sections in restaurants and other public places. Proposition 5 failed and as a result, the plaintiffs in 1980 sought to qualify a similar measure for the 1980 ballot.

In order to assist with the 1980 effort, the plaintiffs wanted to contact, through mail, the people who had signed the 1978 petition--to invite them to events, ask for donations and ask them to sign the 1980 petition and ask their friends to do so.

The California Attorney General issued an advisory opinion saying that Section 29770 of California elections code, this was impermissible. The plaintiffs appealed.

External links