For status updates, visit lucyburns.org.
Ballotpedia's coverage of elections held on March 3, 2015, was limited. Select races were covered live, and all results will be added once the merger is complete.
California Proposition 178, Water Conservation Equipment Tax Exemptions (1994)
Proposition 178, if it had passed, would have amended the California Constitution to exempt from property taxation the value of a property that was related to the installation on the property of water conservation equipment.
| I • II • III • IV • V • VI|
VII • VIII • IX • X • XA
XB • XI • XII • XIII • XIII A
XIII B • XIII C • XIII D • XIV • XV • XVI • XVIII • XIX • XIX A • XIX B • XIX C
XX • XXI • XXII
XXXIV • XXXV
Text of measure
The ballot title read:
- PROPERTY TAX EXCLUSION. WATER CONSERVATION EQUIPMENT. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.
The ballot summary was:
- Amends state constitution to provide for an exclusion from property taxation of that portion of any improvement made to real property which consists of the installation of water conservation equipment, as defined by the Legislature, for agricultural purposes.
The fiscal estimate provided by the California Legislative Analyst's Office said:
- Property tax revenue losses to local governments would be under $1 million in 1994-95, increasing annually for several years to a maximum amount possibly up to $10 million annually. Cities, counties, and special districts would bear about half the loss; school and community college districts would bear the other half.
- The state's General Fund would have to replace all, or nearly all, of the property tax revenue losses experienced by school and community college districts.
Path to the ballot
The California State Legislature voted to put Proposition 178 on the ballot via Senate Constitutional Amendment 4.
- June 7, 1994 Voter Guide
- Statement of vote, California June 7, 1994 statewide elections
- Los Angeles Law Library, 1994 ballot propositions