SLP Badge Transparent.png
Read the
State Legislative Tracker
New edition available now!




California Proposition 190, Judicial Performance and Discipline (1994)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Proposition 190 1994.PNG
Voting on
State Judiciary
State judiciary.jpg
Ballot Measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot
California Constitution
Flag of California.png
Preamble
Articles
IIIIIIIVVVI
VIIVIIIIXXXA
XBXIXIIXIIIXIII A
XIII BXIII CXIII DXIVXVXVIXVIIIXIXXIX AXIX BXIX C
XXXXIXXII
XXXIVXXXV
California Proposition 190 was on the November 8, 1994 general election ballot in California as a legislatively-referred constitutional amendment, where it was approved.

Proposition 190 changed the composition of the state's Commission on Judicial Performance, and altered the way judges in the state are disciplined. It also mandated that when formal disciplinary proceedings against a judge are initiated, the charges and subsequent documentation are to be open to the public. Prop 190 also allows the Commission, rather than the California Supreme Court, to retire or remove a judge, or to censure a judge or former judge.

Election results

California Proposition 190 (1994)
ResultVotesPercentage
Approveda Yes 4,759,874 63.87%
No2,692,37736.13%

Constitutional changes

Proposition 190 amended the California Constitution as follows:

Text of measure

The ballot title was:[1]

Commission on Judicial Performance. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.

The ballot summary was:[1]

  • Transfers authority to remove or discipline judges from California Supreme Court to Commission on Judicial Performance.
  • Provides for public disciplinary proceedings against judges and former judges and specifies the circumstances warranting their removal, retirement, suspension, admonishment, or censure.
  • Increases non-judicial citizen membership on the Commission.
  • Specifies authority of Commission to discipline former judges.
  • Provides immunities to persons employed by or making statements to the Commission.
  • Specifies review processes for Commission determinations and requires the Supreme Court to issue Code of Judicial Ethics.

The fiscal estimate provided by the California Legislative Analyst's Office said:[1]

  • Not likely to have a significant fiscal impact on the state.

Path to the ballot

The California State Legislature voted to put Proposition 190 on the ballot via Assembly Constitutional Amendment 46.[1]

Votes in legislature to refer to ballot
Chamber Ayes Noes
Assembly 74 1
Senate 29 1

See also

External links

BallotpediaAvatar bigger.png
Suggest a link

References