California Regulation of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant (2014)
|Not on Ballot|
| This measure did not or |
will not appear on a ballot
The initiative would have:
- Extended statutory preconditions, currently applicable to the new operation of any nuclear powerplant, to the existing Diablo Canyon plant.
- Before further electricity production is allowed at any plant, required the California Energy Commission to find that the federal government has approved technology for the permanent disposal of high-level nuclear waste. This finding would be subject to rejection by the California State Legislature.
- For nuclear powerplants requiring reprocessing of fuel rods, required the California Energy Commission to find that the federal government has approved technology for nuclear fuel rod reprocessing plants. This finding would be subject to rejection by the California State Legislature.
- Required the California Energy Commission to find, on a case-by-case basis, facilities that will be available with adequate capacity to reprocess or store fuel rods.
Supporters of the measure referred to it as the "California Nuclear Waste Act."
A similar initiative (#12-0013) was authorized for ciculation, but its supporters did not collect sufficient signatures to qualify it for the ballot.
Text of measure
- "Extends statutory preconditions, currently applicable to new operation of any nuclear powerplant, to existing Diablo Canyon plant. Before further electricity production at any plant, requires California Energy Commission to find federal government has approved technology for permanent disposal of high-level nuclear waste. For nuclear powerplants requiring reprocessing of fuel rods, requires Commission to find federal government has approved technology for nuclear fuel rod reprocessing plants. Both findings are subject to Legislature's rejection. Further requires Commission to find on case-by-case basis facilities will be available with adequate capacity to reprocess or store powerplant's fuel rods."
Fiscal impact statement:
- "Potential impacts on state and local finances in the form of decreased revenues and increased costs due to possible electricity price increases and state liabilities. The magnitude of these impacts are uncertain, but could be significant, depending in part on the need for system upgrades for replacement power and whether the state is liable for investment losses. Potential avoidance of major future state and local government costs and lost revenues in the rare event of a major nuclear plant incident."
Path to the ballot
- Ben Davis, Jr., submitted a letter requesting a ballot title on July 23, 2013.
- A ballot title and summary were issued by the Attorney General of California's office on September 12, 2013.
- 504,760 valid signatures were required for qualification purposes.
- The 150-day circulation deadline for #13-0009 was February 10, 2014.
- The initiative failed to qualify for the ballot on February 24, 2014.
State of California
|Ballot measures by year||
1910 | 1911 | 1912 | 1914 | 1915 | 1916 | 1919 | 1920 | 1922 | 1924 | 1926 | 1928 | 1930 | 1932 | 1933 | 1934 | 1935 | 1936 | 1938 | 1939 | 1940 | 1942 | 1944 | 1946 | 1948 | 1949 | 1950 | 1952 | 1954 | 1956 | 1958 | 1960 | 1962 | 1964 | 1966 | 1968 | 1970 | 1972 | 1973 | 1974 | 1976 | 1978 | 1980 | 1982 | 1984 | 1986 | 1988 | 1990 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1996 | 1998 | 2000 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2006 (local) | 2008 | 2008 (local) | 2009 | 2009 (local) | 2010 | 2010 (local) | 2011 (local) | 2012 | 2012 (local) | 2014 | 2016 |
|State executive offices||
Governor | Attorney General | Secretary of State | Controller | Treasurer | State Auditor | Superintendent of Public Instruction | Commissioner of Insurance | Secretary of Agriculture | Secretary for Natural Resources | Director of Industrial Relations | President of Public Utilities |
List of Counties |
List of Cities |
California school districts A - L |
California school districts M - Z |