Vote button trans.png
April's Project of the Month
It's spring time. It's primary election season!
Click here to find all the information you'll need to cast your ballot.




Cavey v. Walrath

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Litigation.png

This WikiFOIA article is a stub. You can help us collect information about this case, and other important FOIA cases across the country, by expanding this article.

Caveyvs.Walrath
Number: 229 N.W.2d 105, 106, 598 N.W.2d 240, 242
Year: 1999
State: Wisconsin
Court: Wisconsin Court of Appeals
Other lawsuits in Wisconsin
Other lawsuits in 1999
Precedents include:
This case established that public funding was not required to come from tax levies and could come in the form of any money delivered from a public coffer.
WikiFOIA
Find your State
Sunshine Laws
Open Records laws
Open Meetings Laws
How to Make Records Requests
Sunshine Legislation
2010
Sorted by State, Year and Topic
Sunshine Litigation
Sorted by State, Year and Topic
Sunshine Nuances
Private Agencies, Public Dollars
Deliberative Process Exemption


Cavey v. Walrath was a case before the Wisconsin Court of Appeals in 1999 concerning the definition of public funding.

Important precedents

This case established that public funding was not required to come from tax levies and could come in the form of any money delivered from a public coffer.[1]

Background

  • Patricia Cavey submitted a records request to Legal Aid Society for payroll records and contracts with the county of Milwaukee.
  • When Legal Aid Society rejected the request, Cavey filed suit.
  • The trial court ruled in favor of Legal Aid, dismissing the lawsuit.[1]

Ruling of the court

The trial court ruled in favor of the Legal Aid Society, determining that because the money received by legal aid did not come from property tax levees, it did not qualify as public funding. However, the court did acknowledge that if the Legal Aid Society were a public body, its payroll records and its contracts with the county would in fact be public records.

The Court of appeals overturned the decision of the trial court. It first rejected the trial courts contention that funding had to come from property tax. Instead, the court felt that the statutory language placed no such restrictions on where funding comes from, and instead adopting the policy that any and all state and municipal funding constituted public funding. Based on this determination, the court overturned the decision of the trial court and instead ruled in favor of Cavey, ordering the documents released.[1]

Associated cases

See also

External links

References