Charles Perry

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Charles Perry
Charles Perry.jpg
Texas House of Representatives, District 83
Incumbent
In office
2011 - Present
Term ends
January 13, 2015
Years in position 3
PartyRepublican
Compensation
Base salary$7,200/year
Per diem$150/day
Elections and appointments
Last electionSeptember 9, 2014
First elected2010
Term limitsN/A
Education
High schoolSweetwater High School 1980
Bachelor'sTexas Tech, 1984
Personal
Birthday03/09/1962
Place of birthAbilene, TX
ProfessionAccountant
Websites
Office website
Campaign website
CandidateVerification
Charles Perry, (b. March 9, 1962), is a Republican member of the Texas House of Representatives, representing District 83. He was first elected to the chamber in 2010.

Perry is a Republican Senator-elect for District 28 of the Texas State Senate following his victory in a September 9, 2014, special election.[1]

Biography

Perry attended Sweetwater High School, graduating in 1980, and attended Texas Tech to earn his B.B.A. in 1984.

Perry is a CPA who owns his own small firm, Charles Perry PC, and is also a land developer with Path, LLC.[2]

Perry is a member of the American Business Clubs (Downtown Chapter), the Boys and Girls Clubs, Community Partners, the Women’s Protective Service, the National Council on Family Violence, the National Teen Dating Abuse Helpline, and the Texas Council on Family Violence. He is also affiliated with the American Institution of Certified Public Accountants, Texas Society of Certified Public Accountants, National Association of Certified Valuation Analysts, and the National Association of Securities Dealers.

Committee assignments

2013-2014

At the beginning of the 2013 legislative session, Perry served on the following committees:

Texas Committee Assignments, 2013
Appropriations
Government Efficiency & Reform, Vice-chair
Transparency in State Agency Operations (Select)

2011-2012

During the 2011-2012 legislative session, Perry served on the following Texas House of Representatives committees:

Issues

University of Texas investigations

See also: Wallace Hall impeachment trial

Seal of Texas.svg.png

University of Texas Investigations

Background
Wallace Hall impeachment trialPolitical favoritism in admissions to the University of TexasForgivable loans program at the University of Texas Law School House Select Committee on Transparency in State Agency Operations (TSAO)Joint Committee on Oversight of Higher Ed Governance, Excellence & Transparency

UT Regents
Wallace HallPaul FosterEugene PowellSteven HicksErnest AlisedaJeffery HildebrandBrenda PejovichAlex CranbergRobert Stillwell

Elected Officials
Rick PerryJoe StrausCharles PerryTrey FischerDan FlynnNaomi GonzalezEric JohnsonLyle LarsonCarol AlvaradoFour PriceJim PittsDan Branch

UT Individuals
Bill PowersLarry SagerBarry BurgdorfKevin HegartyFrancisco CigarroaCarol Longoria

Texas state legislators are exploring an unprecedented legal step -- impeaching an appointed official. University of Texas Regent Wallace Hall, who was named to the post by Governor Rick Perry, is the subject of an investigation by a Texas state house committee. Legislators who are in favor of the impeachment process initially set out to investigate whether Hall failed to disclose information on his regent application, revealed protected information about students and exceeded his role as a regent in requesting massive amounts of information. Although the committee left open the possibility of revisiting impeachment, an August 11, 2014 vote passed 6-1 to censure Hall, possibly bringing a close to the more than year-long process.[3][4] In response to the censure vote, Governor of Texas Rick Perry issued a statement defending Hall's actions, saying the regent acted in the best interest of Texas "in the face of withering personal attacks."[5]

Only two elected officials in the history of Texas have ever been successfully impeached.[6] Hall is the first regent to have been censured by the Texas State Legislature.[7]

Governor Rick Perry and others have strongly criticized the attempted impeachment. Critics says it is an effort to criminalize policy differences. In late November 2013, Perry and State House Speaker Joe Straus sent letters to gubernatorial appointees to address the impeachment trial. Perry's letter explained the importance of oversight of state agencies by gubernatorial appointees. In his letter, Straus agreed with Perry and wrote, "Both board members and the Legislature need to ask difficult questions."[8][9][10][11][12]

After he was appointed in 2011, University of Texas Regent Wallace Hall began looking into what he believed to be clout scandals within the University of Texas system. Hall investigated the university's forgivable-loans program and admissions policies and preferential treatment to politically-connected individuals.[13] Hall filed FOIA requests with the University system after his inquiries via his role as a Regent were initially rebuffed.[14] According to his accusers, Hall filed requests of more than 800,000 pages, which some Texas administrators called an unnecessary burden.[15][16] However, a letter from University chancellor Francisco Cigarroa in February 2014 said that Hall requested closer to 100,000 pages.[17][18] In addition, Cigarroa wrote: "During testimony before the Select Committee, some early witnesses implied that the U.T. System has not protected the privacy rights of students, staff, and patients. This is simply not true."[19]

An effort was begun in June 2013 to try and impeach Hall from his position as Regent. Some legislators justified the impeachment on the grounds that Hall did not disclose several lawsuits that he was involved in when he originally completed his Regent background check. Hall updated Governor Rick Perry's office in April 2013 with the full list.[20][21] The lack of lawsuit disclosure by Hall is not unique -- more than 9,000 lawsuits were not disclosed by other appointed Texas officials.[22] No unelected official in Texas has ever been successfully impeached or removed from office.[23] Governor of Texas Rick Perry's spokesperson said the investigations send a "chilling message" to gubernatorial appointees.[24] He added that the investigation was "extraordinary political theater."[25] Texas state legislators have never previously tried to remove an appointed official. Only two elected officials in the history of Texas have ever been successfully impeached.[26]

Richard Legon, president of the Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, criticized the impeachment process in a November interview with the Austin American-Statesman. He called the impeachment process the "nuclear option" and said it could send a chilling signal to other members of higher education boards. Legon suggested that the board should have first been given the opportunity to address Hall's requests. "It’s fine for a board member to seek information through the appropriate path. The first layer of reining in an overly aggressive board member should be the board," he said.[27]

A January 2014 review by the law firm Hilder & Associates concluded that there was "no credible evidence of a violation of [the state government code] that would warrant a referral for criminal prosecution." The report concluded that Hall had a legitimate reason for having the documents in question. "In light of the fundamental role attorneys play, it would lead to an absurd result were it criminal for an official to provide student records to his or her attorney in the face of litigation, or anticipated litigation, involving these records," Philip Hilder wrote in the report. Hilder submitted the report to the legislative committee. The Board of Regents hired the firm to review whether Hall may have violated any federal privacy laws in his handling of student information. November 2013 testimony prompted committee-member Trey Fischer to request the inquiry. Committee member Dan Flynn said he was not surprised by the findings and was pleased the university counsel reached a conclusion.[28][29][30][31]

The hiring of Rusty Hardin to conduct an investigation into Hall's activities ultimately cost the state $500,000. Although the bills ultimately came to more than $588,000, Hardin's team told State Speaker of the House Joe Straus that a cap of $500,000 would be placed on the expenses.[32][33]

Committee on transparency activity

Perry is one of the eight members of the Committee on Transparency in State Agency Operations, which is overseeing the investigation into a possible impeachment. The committee was formed in 2013, specifically existing to explore the possibility of impeaching Hall. The committee is holding hearings in late 2013 to hear testimony from individuals from the university system.[34]

In September 2013, Dan Flynn, co-chair of the select committee, said three basic questions would be asked during the process.[35]

  1. Did Hall fail to disclose material information on his application to be a regent?[36]
  2. Did he reveal information about students that violated their privacy?[36]
  3. Did he exceed his role as a regent in requesting massive amounts of information from UT-Austin?[36]
Request for personal computers

In November 2013, committee member Trey Martinez Fischer submitted a request indicating a desire to look at Hall's personal computers, iPads and smartphones as part of the investigation. "We must consider forensic examination of the personal or professional electronic communications of the regents in order to ensure compliance with the law," Fischer wrote in a letter to committee attorney Rusty Hardin.[37]

Subpoena of Hall

At a November 12, 2013 meeting, the committee issued a subpoena for Hall to appear on December 10. However, legislators quickly rescinded the subpoena, since no meeting was scheduled until December 18. Legislators also voted to issue subpoenas to University of Texas Chancellor Francisco Cigarroa and University of Texas, Austin President Bill Powers to appear at the December 18, 2013 meeting.[38][39][40][41] With no subpoena having yet been issued to Hall, his lawyers sent a letter to the committee asking for clarification. With Francisco Cigarroa and Bill Powers already subpoenaed, Hall's lawyer Allan Van Fleet requested that the committee respond regarding whether it would also subpoena Hall. He said that Hall's lawyers have told him not to appear before the committee without a subpoena. On December 5, 2013, Van Fleet sent a letter to the committee requesting that the co-chairs announce whether Hall would indeed be subpoenaed. Van Fleet's request asked for an answer by the end of the day. In response, committee attorney Rusty Hardin said "We're not going to adhere to his deadline. He doesn't get to pick the time and place." Van Fleet pointed out that providing two weeks' notice for testimony is the standard to allow individuals to prepare testimony. He added that the letter has "caused confusion about the committee's intentions."[42]

On December 10, 2013, the committee sent a letter to Hall asking that he testify -- but they did not issue a subpoena. The committee sent a one-page, two-paragraph letter that invited Hall to testify and provide a list of witnesses.[43] On December 16, 2013, Hall's attorney Allan Van Fleet said Hall would not testify at the December 18 committee hearing. Van Fleet wrote: "Regent Hall has volunteered a number of times in the past to share his views with legislative Committees about the challenges and opportunities faced by the UT System. Though these offers have never been accepted, he remains interested in sharing his views, in collaborating with all policy makers on initiatives that will benefit the UT System, and in working with the committees to improve the transparency and accountability practices that should guide all UT System activities."[44][45][46][47]

Hall was invited to testify but was not given a subpoena, which is often perceived to provide some legal protection to the witness. Other individuals -- such as Chancellor Francisco Cigarroa and University of Texas Austin President Bill Powers -- were given formal subpoenas. Legislators criticized Hall for not agreeing to testify, despite the differing set of circumstances given to Hall. "It’s very disappointing to me that he and his attorney do not understand or do not care to observes the rules and procedures of the Texas House of Representatives and have decided they are not going to appear to testify," said co-chair Dan Flynn. Committee member Charles Perry noted that while all individuals who testified were given an official subpoena, Hall himself was not granted one. In fact, it was more directly avoided by the committee, after it first sent him a subpoena only to withdraw it.[48] A subpoena would have insulated individuals from risk in violating FERPA.[49][50][51]

Empower Texans response

In December 2013, the nonprofit organization Empower Texans sent a mailer criticizing committee chair Carol Alvarado. The mailer stated that lawmakers improperly focused on Hall's behavior, rather than investigating the allegations of clout at the University of Texas, Austin. Alvarado called the mailer the action of "an outside group that’s trying to influence an investigation." Empower Texans president Michael Quinn Sullivan said the legislature was engaging in a "whitewashing" of potential university wrongdoings. "We're impeaching someone for asking questions," he said.[52][53]

Committee report
Note: The full draft report can be found here

On April 7, 2014, the San Antonio Express-News and Houston Chronicle viewed an advance copy of Hardin's 176-page report. The newspapers reported that the document was previously made available to committee members on April 4, 2014. The report alleges that Hall broke state and federal law. As of April 8, 2014, the report was not yet made public. Hall's lawyers said he would not comment on the report until he had seen it. According to the newspaper summary, the report alleges that Hall attempted to coerce UT administrators prior to their testimony.[54][55] The report refers to Hall's "burdensome" requests for records as one of the critiques laid out against the regent.[56][57]

The Texas Tribune, which also received a copy of the report, wrote that "ironically a substantial number of the actions that the Hardin report highlights as potentially triggering impeachment occurred in part or entirely because of the committee’s investigation." The report listed four items as a sufficient basis for articles of impeachment. The report does not make any explicit recommendation to the committee.[58]

The draft report recommended to the committee that impeachment could be pursued for at least four bases.[59]

Hall's lawyers' response to the report

On May 6, 2014, Hall's attorney Allan Van Fleet sent a letter to the Transparency Committee in response to the report issued by Rusty Hardin. Van Fleet accused the committee of withholding information that would "exonerate Regent Hall from all of the committee's charges." The letter alleged that the committee "manipulated the process to prevent public exposure to the truth."[60]

Van Fleet's May 6 letter made reference to a previously sent letter on April 25, 2014, that requested the release of an audio recording from an August 22, 2013 University of Texas System Board of Regents board meeting. According to the letter, a recording made by Regent Alex Cranberg at the meeting pinpoints the exact position of the Regent members regarding President Bill Powers' employment situation. The letter maintained it is a key piece of evidence that has not been released to the public. Hall's lawyers requested that the recording be released and sent to the Travis County District Attorney. The Texas Tribune also requested the recording. University of Texas System officials then asked the Attorney General for permission to withhold the recording.[61][62]

The letter from Van Fleet lists seven facts that he alleges refutes the committee's assertions. Those facts listed were as follows:[63]

  1. "Regent Hall fully disclosed information on his nomination application"[63]
  2. "Regent Hall did not violate FERPA protections"[63]
  3. "Regent Hall did not “leak” or otherwise disclose student information"[63]
  4. "Regent Hall properly represented the UT System in discussions about charitable donations"[63]
  5. "Regent Hall’s information requests were reasonable and necessary"[63]
  6. "Regent Hall did not tamper with or coerce testimony"[63]
  7. "The committee has manipulated the process to prevent public exposure to the truth about every issue under investigation"[63]

Post-report meetings

On April 24, 2014, the committee met privately for three hours discussing Hardin's report. Legislators would not disclose the conversations held behind closed doors.[64][65][66]

A committee hearing was held on May 12, 2014 where legislators voted 7-1 that there were grounds for impeachment. Committee co-chair Dan Flynn (R) called the vote a "historical time."[67] Charles Perry (R) was the one representative who voted against grounds for impeachment. In response to the vote, Hall released a statement, in which he defended his actions and accused the transparency committee of interfering with investigations of the University. "My efforts as a regent are to serve the interests of our great educational institutions, the students, faculty, and staff who make them great, and the taxpayers who fund them, not to appease a privileged class who abuse them," Hall said in the statement.[68][69]

Reaction

Anne Neal, president of the American Council of Trustees and Alumni (ACTA), said the investigation of Hall was "simply off the rails." Throughout much of the investigation, legislators have maintained that Hall was on a "witch hunt" for President Bill Powers. Neal's statement took the opposite approach, accusing the legislature of engaging in an "expensive witch hunts designed to discourage public servants from asking tough questions in pursuit of the public interest." According to its website, the ACTA is "an independent, non-profit organization committed to academic freedom, excellence, and accountability at America's colleges and universities."[70] The Texas Coalition for Higher Education Excellence supported the report's conclusions. Spokeswoman Jenifer Sarver called the findings, "deeply troubling."[71]

After the release of the report, Hall's lawyers sent a letter on April 8, 2014 to the committee on transparency. In the letter, Hall's lawyers requested that a copy of the report be sent to their offices, as they had not been delivered a version prior to the leak of the report to the media.[72]

In light of the report, editors at the Houston Chronicle called for Hall to resign.[73]

Censure vote reaction

Perry was the lone vote against censure in the August 11, 2014 committee meeting. He said it was not the business of the legislature to micromanage the day-to-day operations of the higher education system. "The man was doing his job, in the sense that he was trying to make sure the university was operating above board and transparently. His methods were not something I approve of."[74]

Campaign themes

2012

Perry's website highlighted the following campaign themes:

Balanced Texas’ Budget

  • Excerpt: "Voted to cut waste and balance Texas’ budget without raising taxes"

Voter ID

  • Excerpt: "Co-authored the bill to prevent fraudulent voting by requiring a photo ID to vote"

Redistricting

  • Excerpt: "Worked with leadership to maximize representation in the South Plains and West Texas"

Lawsuit Reform

  • Excerpt: "Co-authored lawsuit reform to prevent frivolous lawsuits from burdening local businesses"

Pro-Life

  • Excerpt: "Authored an amendment to strip taxpayer money from clinics that provide abortions and supported legislation to better protect the mother and child"

Texas Tech

  • Excerpt: "Voted to assist Texas Tech on its pathway to becoming a Tier 1 university"

Elections

2014

State senate

See also: Texas state legislative special elections, 2014

Charles Perry (R) defeated Greg Wortham (D), Jodey Arrington (R), E.M. Garza (R), Delwin Jones (R) and Kerry Douglas McKennon (L) in the special election on September 9.[75][1]

The seat was vacant following Robert Duncan's (R) resignation on July 3, 2014, to become Chancellor of Texas Tech University.[76]

A special election for the position of Texas State Senate District 28 was called for September 9. The filing deadline for candidates wishing to run in this election was August 1, 2014.[77]

State house

See also: Texas House of Representatives elections, 2014

Elections for all 150 seats in the Texas House of Representatives will take place in 2014. A primary election took place on March 4, 2014. Those candidates who did not receive 50% or more of the vote in their party primary on March 4 faced an additional May 27 primary runoff. The general election will be held on November 4, 2014. The signature-filing deadline for candidates wishing to run in these elections was December 9, 2013. Incumbent Charles Perry defeated Steve Massengale in the Republican primary and is unchallenged in the general election.[78][79][80]

2012

See also: Texas House of Representatives elections, 2012

Perry ran in the 2012 election for Texas House of Representatives, District 83. Perry defeated Delwin Jones in the May 29 primary election and was unchallenged in the general election, which took place on November 6, 2012.[81]

Texas House of Representatives District 83 Republican Primary, 2012
Candidate Vote % Votes
Green check mark transparent.pngCharles Perry Incumbent 71.1% 13,142
Delwin Jones 28.9% 5,343
Total Votes 18,485

2010

See also: Texas House of Representatives elections, 2010

Perry won election unopposed to the District 83 seat in the general election on November 2, 2010.[81]

In the April 13 Republican primary runoff, Perry defeated incumbent Delwin Jones by a margin of 10,131-7,403. Jones was seeking his 16th term. No other candidates have declared for this race.

Despite placing second in the primary, Perry made it a close enough second-place finish to require a runoff. He won that election handily.

Texas House of Representatives, District 83
2010 General election results
Candidates Votes Percent
Green check mark transparent.png Charles Perry (R) 33,824 100%


2010 Race for House 83 - Republican Runoff[82]
Candidate Votes Percentage
Charles Perry (R) 10,131 57.77%
Delwin Jones (I) 7,403 42.22%
Total votes 17,534


2010 Race for House 83 - Republican Primary[83]
Candidate Votes Percentage
Charles Perry (R) 8,136 32.04%
Zach Brady (R) 7,310 28.78%
Delwin Jones (I) 9,945 39.16%
Total votes 25,391

Campaign donors

Comprehensive donor information for Perry is available dating back to 2010. Based on available campaign finance records, Perry raised a total of $507,898 during that time period. This information was last updated on August 14, 2013.[84]

Charles Perry's Campaign Contribution History
Year Office Result Contributions
2012 Texas State House, District 83 Won $210,930
2010 Texas State House, District 83 Won $296,968
Grand Total Raised $507,898

2012

Perry won re-election to the Texas House of Representatives in 2012. During that election cycle, Perry raised a total of $210,930.
Texas House of Representatives 2012 election - Campaign Contributions
Top contributors to Charles Perry's campaign in 2012
Rockafellow Investments LLC$25,000
Perry, Bob J$15,000
Texans For Lawsuit Reform$15,000
Sandefer, Jeff Davis$6,000
Nelson, Loren$5,000
Total Raised in 2012$210,930
Source:Follow the Money

2010

Perry won election to the Texas House of Representatives in 2010. During that election cycle, Perry raised a total of $296,968.

Scorecards

See also: State legislative scorecards and State legislative scorecards in Texas

Legislative scorecards are used to evaluate elected public officials based on voting record. Some scorecards are created by political advocacy groups with a focus on specific issues, while others are developed by newspapers and are broad in scope. Scorecards are meant to be used as a tool for voters to have a quick picture of whether their views align with a particular legislator's record.

Because scorecards can be specific to particular issues or general to a state’s legislative term, for example, each report should be considered on its own merits. Each entity that publishes these reports uses different methodologies and definitions for the terms used.

An overview for scorecards in all 50 states can be found on this page. To contribute to the list of Texas scorecards, email suggestions to scorecards@ballotpedia.org.

Please see our writing guidelines if you would like to add results from an individual scorecard to this legislator's profile.

2013

In 2013, the Texas State Legislature was in its 83rd legislative session from January 8 through May 27. Thirty minutes after the regular session ended, Governor Rick Perry called legislators back for a special session starting that evening.[85] Two additional called sessions were held from July 1 through July 30 and July 30 through August 5.[86]

  • Legislators are scored on bills which relate to economic freedom, the size and scope of government, and individual liberty.
  • Legislators are scored based on their votes on bills relating to the organizations principles, missions, and goals of responsible, conservative solutions for Texas.
  • Legislators are scored based on their votes on bills relating to core budget and free enterprise issues.
  • Legislators are scored based on votes for bills with the greatest impact on Texas’ environment and public health.
  • Equality Texas - Equality Texas rankings for the Texas House during the 83rd regular legislative session
  • Legislators are assigned grades reflecting votes on LGBT issues.
  • Legislators are scored based on their votes on bills relating to taxes and property rights.
  • Legislators are scored based on issues critical to businesses, taxpayers and families.
  • Legislators are scored based on votes relating to conservative issues.
  • The 2013 TLCV scorecard covers a range of votes and issues, including: water, global warming, environmental regulation, clean energy, clean air, good government, oil and gas regulation, and energy efficiency.
  • Legislators are scored based on votes for bills relating to this issue of abortion.
  • Mark P. Jones is the Chair of the Department of Political Science at Rice University. He builds a ranking of Texas state representatives each year based on their votes from the previous session. Jones then ranks legislators based on how liberal and conservative they are according to legislative history.
  • Legislators are scored on their votes on key conservative issues.
  • Legislators are scored based on votes for Amendments 2, 12, 51, 95 and 118.
  • Legislators are scored based on votes for House Bill 2.
  • Legislators are scored on their votes on key small business issues.

2011

In 2011, the Texas State Legislature was in its 82nd legislative session from January 11 through May 30. A special session was called for May 31 through June 29.[86]

  • Legislators are scored based on their votes on bills relating to the organizations principles, missions, and goals of responsible, conservative solutions for Texas.
  • Legislators are scored based on their votes on bills relating to core budget and free enterprise issues.
  • Legislators are scored based on votes on social issues, economic issues and other issues.
  • The Humane Scorecard assesses support on a broad range of animal protection issues.
  • Legislators are scored based on votes relating to conservative issues.
  • Legislators are scored based on votes relating to environment and conservation issues.
  • Legislators are scored based on votes for bills relating to this issue of abortion.
  • Mark P. Jones is the Chair of the Department of Political Science at Rice University. He builds a ranking of Texas state representatives each year based on their votes from the previous session. Jones then ranks legislators based on how liberal and conservative they are according to legislative history.
  • Legislators are scored based on 56 House votes and 38 Senate votes that offer clear public policy choice.

Empower Texans Fiscal Responsibility Index

See also: Empower Texans Fiscal Responsibility Index and Empower Texans

Empower Texans produces the Fiscal Responsibility Index as "a measurement of how lawmakers perform on size and role of government issues." The index uses "exemplar votes on core budget and free enterprise issues that demonstrate legislators' governing philosophy." Legislators were graded along a 0 through 100 scale in 2013 and on an A through F grading scale in 2011.

2013

Perry received a score of 83.4 in the 2013 Fiscal Responsibility Index, compared to the grade of A+ that Perry received for the 2011 Fiscal Responsibility Index.

2011

Charles Perry received a grade of A+ on the 2011 Fiscal Responsibility Index.

  • 2011 Taxpayer Champion. Perry was named a "2011 Taxpayer Champion," which is "the top award presented by Texans for Fiscal Responsibility to legislators based on their rating on the most recent Fiscal Responsibility Index."

Personal

Perry and his wife, Jaclyn, have two children. The Perry's belong to Southcrest Baptist Church, where Charles is a deacon.

Recent news

BallotpediaAvatar bigger.png
Know more information about this profile?
Submit a bio

This section displays the most recent stories in a Google news search for the term "Charles + Perry + Texas + House"

All stories may not be relevant to this page due to the nature of the search engine.

Charles Perry News Feed

  • Loading...

See also

External links

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Texas Tribune, "Perry Wins Special Election for Senate Seat," September 9, 2014
  2. KCBD.com, "About Charles Perry, candidate State Representative Dist. 83," accessed October 18, 2010
  3. Dallas Morning News, "Panel censures but doesn’t impeach UT Regent Wallace Hall," August 11, 2014
  4. Austin American-Statesman, "Panel censures UT Regent Wallace L. Hall Jr.," August 11, 2014
  5. Your Houston News, "Statement by Gov. Perry on UT Regent Wallace Hall," August 11, 2014
  6. Texas Public Radio, "UT Regent Wallace Hall Will Testify In Impeachment Hearing," November 13, 2013
  7. Austin Business Journal, "A first: UT regent censured," August 11, 2014
  8. Texas Tribune, "Perry, Straus reach out to appointees amid Hall inquiry," December 21, 2013
  9. Daily Caller, "Texas tries to topple higher-ed transparency," November 21, 2013
  10. Fort Worth Star-Telegram, "Perry calls regent impeachment “political theater”," October 30, 2013
  11. Lubbock Online, "Perry, Straus Reach Out to Appointees Amid Hall Inquiry," December 22, 2013
  12. Texas Tribune, "Letter from Rick Perry to Appointees," November 22, 2013
  13. American Spectator, "Transparency for Thee," October 25, 2013
  14. Daily Texas Online, "Facing impeachment, Regent Wallace Hall defends actions in debate with Sen. Kirk Watson," September 28, 2013
  15. Daily Texas Online, "Former UT System vice chancellor alleges Regent Wallace Hall’s ‘clear intent to get rid of Bill Powers’," October 24, 2013
  16. Dallas Morning News, "UT regent sought 800,000 documents, official says in impeachment hearing," October 22, 2013
  17. Watchdog, "‘Witch hunt’ fallout: Speaker calls for narrower public records law," February 5, 2014
  18. Texas Tribune, "UT System Responds to Transparency Committee Directives," February 3, 2014
  19. Texas Tribune, "Cigarroa letter to the Committee on Transparency in State Agency Operations," February 1, 2014
  20. Texas Tribune, "UT Regent Wallace Hall Updates Lawsuit Disclosures," April 30, 2013
  21. Real Clear Policy, "The Campaign Against Wallace Hall," August 15, 2013
  22. Watchdog.org, "Case against UT regent Wallace Hall is a sham — here’s proof," September 6, 2013
  23. News-Journal, "University of Texas regent not worried by impeachment inquiry," September 9, 2013
  24. Texas Tribune, "Transparency Committee to Mull Impeachment of UT Regent," June 25, 2013
  25. Texas Tribune, "Perry Blasts Impeachment Probe of Wallace Hall," October 30, 2013
  26. Texas Public Radio, "UT Regent Wallace Hall Will Testify In Impeachment Hearing," November 13, 2013
  27. Austin American Statesman, "A UT regent impeachment could make other boards cautious, expert says," November 29, 2013
  28. Dallas Morning News, "UT Regent Hall didn't commit crime, university attorney concludes,"January 16, 2014
  29. Watchdog, "UT Report: Charge against Hall is legally 'absurd'" January 14, 2014
  30. Texas Tribune, "Report: Regent Didn't Violate Student Privacy Laws," January 15, 2014
  31. Texas Tribune Uploads, "Hilder & Associates Report," January 13, 2014
  32. Houston Chronicle, "UPDATED: Wallace Hall impeachment probe cost $500K," July 22, 2014
  33. KWTX, "Cost Of UT Regent Probe Reaches Almost $600,000," July 22, 2014
  34. Texas State House Committees, "Transparency in State Agency Operations Committee Members," accessed October 31, 2013
  35. Texas Monthly, "Regent Wallace Hall is Another Step Closer to Impeachment," September 17, 2013
  36. 36.0 36.1 36.2 Austin American Statesman, "Transparency panel begins investigation of UT regent with closed-door session," September 16, 2013
  37. Texas Tribune, "Lawmaker Eyes Access to UT Regents' Computers," November 4, 2013
  38. San Francisco Chronicle, "Texas House subpoenas Hall, but then recalls it," November 12, 2013
  39. Texas Tribune, "UT System Lawyer: Hall May Have Shared Private Info," November 12, 2013
  40. Austin American Statesman, "UT Regent Wallace Hall might have broken privacy laws, panel members suggest," November 12, 2013
  41. Texas Tribune, "Committee Recalls Subpoena for UT Regent Hall," November 12, 2013
  42. Texas Tribune, "Ahead of Hearings, UT Regent Hall Requests Subpoena," December 5, 2013
  43. Texas Tribune, "Committee Letter to Hall," December 10, 2013
  44. My San Antonio, "Letter to Committee," December 16, 2013
  45. The Republic, "Embattled UT Regent Wallace Hall won't testify to lawmakers considering possible impeachment," December 17, 2013
  46. Your Houston News, "UT regent facing possible ouster won’t testify," December 17, 2013
  47. Texas Tribune, "UT Regent Hall Declines Invitation to Testify," December 17, 2013
  48. News Journal, "Lawmaker: Regent’s silence ’slap in face’" December 19, 2013
  49. Dallas Morning News, "UT regent Wallace Hall won’t attend impeachment investigation," December 17, 2013
  50. Texas Public Radio, "UT Regent Wallace Hall Declines to Speak with Lawmakers," December 16, 2013
  51. Watchdog, "Chancellor is probing favoritism in UT admissions," December 19, 2013
  52. Houston Chronicle, "Empower Texans mailer criticizes Hall impeachment panel," December 19, 2013
  53. My San Antonio, "Clout Mailer from Empower Texans," December 19, 2013
  54. Houston Chronicle, "Report: UT regent abused office, may have violated law," April 7, 2014
  55. Dallas Morning News, "UT regent Wallace Hall possibly committed impeachable offenses, investigation report show," April 7, 2014
  56. Austin American Statesman, "Report for House panel finds grounds to impeach UT Regent Wallace L. Hall Jr.," April 7, 2014
  57. Houston Chronicle, "Report: UT regent may have broken law," April 7, 2014
  58. Texas Tribune, "Report Cites Possible Grounds for Hall's Impeachment," April 8, 2014
  59. Rusty Hardin & Associates, LLP, "Investigative Report to the House Select Committee on Transparency in State Agency Operations regarding Conduct by University of Texas Regent Wallace Hall and Impeachment Under the June 25, 2013 Proclamation," March 2014
  60. Austin American-Statesman, "UT regent’s lawyer accuses panel of withholding information," May 6, 2014
  61. Texas Tribune, "Hall's Lawyer Accuses Committee of Withholding Information," May 6, 2014
  62. Watchdog, "Attorney: Secret tape covered up by lawmakers proves regent’s innocence," May 7, 2014
  63. 63.0 63.1 63.2 63.3 63.4 63.5 63.6 63.7 Texas Tribune, "Letter from Van Fleet to the Committee on May 6, 2014
  64. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named april_meeting
  65. Texas Tribune, "Committee to Vote on Impeachment Recommendation in May," April 24, 2014
  66. Austin American Statesman, "Panel investigating UT Regent Wallace Hall sets May 12 vote for possible impeachment recommendation," April 24, 2014
  67. San Francisco Chronicle, "Texas House panel set to vote on Hall impeachment," May 11, 2014
  68. Texas Tribune, "Panel Votes That Grounds for Impeachment Exist for Hall," May 12, 2014
  69. Dallas Morning News, "Texas House panel finds grounds to impeach UT System regent Wallace Hall of Dallas," May 12, 2014
  70. American Council of Trustees and Alumni, "Statement from ACTA President Anne Neal on UT Trustee Wallace Hall," April 9, 2014
  71. Texas Tribune, "Higher Ed Group: Regent Investigation "Off the Rails"," April 9, 2014
  72. Texas Tribune, "Letter from Stephen Ryan to Carol Alvarado and Dan Flynn," April 8, 2014
  73. Houston Chronicle, "Step down, please," April 11, 2014
  74. KFYO, "District 83 Representative Charles Perry Discusses the Wallace Hall Censure on KFYO [AUDIO," August 12, 2014]
  75. Texas Secretary of State, "Official candidate list," accessed August 7, 2014
  76. Burnt Orange Report, "Sen. Robert Duncan (R) to Resign from Texas Senate, Become Chancellor of Texas Tech," May 20, 2014
  77. My Fox Lubbock, "Gov. Perry sets date for special election in Dist. 28 Senate seat," July 22, 2014
  78. Texas Secretary of State, "1992 - Current ELECTION HISTORY," accessed July 30, 2014
  79. The Libertarian Party of Texas, "2014 Texas Representative Candidate List," accessed July 30, 2014
  80. Green Party of Texas, "Greens Release Candidate List," accessed July 30, 2014
  81. 81.0 81.1 Texas Secretary of State, "1992 - Current Election History," accessed February 17, 2014
  82. Texas Secretary of State, “Race Summary Report: 2010 Republican Party Primary Runoff Election, 4/13/2010”, accessed October 18, 2010
  83. Texas Secretary of State, “Race Summary Report: 2010 Republican Party Primary Election, 3/2/2010”, accessed October 18, 2010
  84. Follow the Money, "Perry, Charles," accessed August 14, 2013
  85. kten.com, "Texas Lawmakers To Tackle Redistricting In Special Session," May 29, 2013
  86. 86.0 86.1 Legislative reference Library of Texas, "Texas Legislative Sessions and Years," accessed June 13, 2014
Political offices
Preceded by
Delwin Jones (R)
Texas House of Representatives District 83
2011-Present
Succeeded by
-