PGI logo cropped.png
Congressional Millionaire’s Club
The Personal Gain Index shines a light on how members of Congress benefit during their tenure.





Chris Anderson recall, Chattanooga, Tennessee (2014)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Recall
RecallBanner.jpg
Historical recalls
Recall news
Recall laws

An effort to recall city councilman Chris Anderson in Chattanooga, Tennessee from his position was launched in January 2014.[1][2] The recall did not go to a vote.[3]

Recall supporter arguments

In January 2014, Chattanooga resident Charlie Wysong submitted paperwork to initiate recall proceedings against Anderson. At issue was a domestic partner benefit law championed by Anderson and opposed by Wysong and other recall supporters. Other Anderson opponents claimed the District 7 councilman had distanced himself from the district's black community and had generally failed to represent the needs of his constituents. Recall proponent Mahmood Abdullah said, "[Anderson] doesn't represent what the people want. His only goal is to boost homosexuality." Local pastor Alfred Johnson has claimed to be the leader of the recall effort.[1]

Official's response

In response to the recall effort, Anderson, one of the first openly gay city council members in the state, said, "I knew when I ran for public office that I would have to make decisions that were politically difficult. If you want to recall me over the equal rights of the public servants that work so hard for the City of Chattanooga, bring it on."[1]

In February 2014, Anderson filed suit to request an injunction to stop the recall effort. "The thing is, it takes thousands of votes to win an election, but it only takes one person to file a recall. So the existence of a recall is not indicative of somebody's job performance. It's just the opinion of at least one person. ... They are recalling me because I'm openly gay," said Anderson.[4]

Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing recall in Tennessee

The Hamilton County Election Commission approved the petition language at its February 13, 2014 meeting. Recall supporters needed to gather 1,600 signatures in order to trigger a recall election.[1][5][4]

Attorney Stuart James submitted a letter to the Election Commission encouraging them to reject the petition. James argued that the recall effort was a "clear abuse of the process."[6]

Local Tea Party leader Mark West denied that his group, Citizens for Government Accountability and Transparency, spearheaded the recall effort.[7]

Election administrator Kerry Steelman reported on March 19, 2014 that recall proponents had so far submitted only 146 valid signatures, well shy of the 1,600 needed to trigger a recall. Officials also reported that several signature pages appeared to be in the same handwriting.[8]

The deadline for recall proponents to submit petitions was April 29, 2014. At that time, 793 signatures had been validated. Recall organizer Charlie Wysong said, "It looks very close. We've [been] doing all the work we can do, and now we're simply praying." Anderson maintained that it was "highly unlikely - almost impossible" that the recall effort would succeed.[9]

In early May 2014, the election commission announced that it had found only 1,179 of the signatures submitted to be valid, meaning that the recall effort had failed and would not go to a vote. Anderson said, "I think, not in my mind, but in their talking points and in their script, it was about bigotry and hatred and I don't have time for those kind of people." Recall proponents maintained that they would continue their efforts. Supporter Gil Shropshire said, "Our next step is that we're going to challenge this voting list [against which signatures were verified] because it needs to be purged ... if it's purged the way it's supposed to be purged, we have more than enough signatures." Elections administrator Kerry Steelman said it was unlikely that a recount or purge would occur. Steelman claimed that a purge had been completed in 2011.[3]

See also

External links

References