Vote button trans.png
April's Project of the Month
It's spring time. It's primary election season!
Click here to find all the information you'll need to cast your ballot.




City of Banning Hotel Tax, Measure L (November 2009)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
A City of Banning Hotel Tax, Measure L ballot question was on the November 3, 2009 ballot for voters in the City of Banning in Riverside County, where it was approved.[1]

Voters were asked to increase the city's hotel tax from 6% to 12%. The tax will end in ten years, according to the terms of the ballot measure. The city believes that the added tax will generate about $275,000 annually for the city.

The vote on the city council to refer it to the ballot was 4-1. Councilwoman Barbara Hanna voted against it because of the clause that would end the tax after ten years. The city council voted 5-0 to declare a city fiscal emergency.

Banning has a population of about 23,500 residents.

Election results

Measure L
ResultVotesPercentage
Approveda Yes 3,337 75.14%
No1,10424.86%
These final, certified, results are from the Riverside County elections office.

City budget

According to the city council, at the time of the vote on Measure L, the City of Banning was in financial distress. They had approved $5 million in cuts to the 2009-2010 fiscal year budget they had hoped to pass. The council also voted 5-0 to declare a fiscal emergency, enabling it to put the measure on the ballot.

Competitive disadvantage

There are about five hotels and motels in Banning. Hiral Patel, who owns one of them, told the city council that imposing a higher hotel tax would put all the city's hotels and motels at a competitive disadvantage.[1]

Support

The editorial board of the Press-Enterprise endorsed Measure L, saying, "This measure provides a fairly painless way for Banning residents to bolster city finances."[2]

See also

External links

References