City of Santa Monica Rental Registration Fees, Measure FS (November 2014)

Voting on taxes
Ballot measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot
Local City taxes County taxes School taxes Property taxes Sales taxes Income taxes Other taxes

A City of Santa Monica Rental Registration Fees, Measure FS ballot question was on the November 4, 2014 election ballot for voters in the city of Santa Monica in Los Angeles County, California. It was approved.

Measure FS amended the Santa Monica Charter to establish a maximum annual registration fee of $288 per rental unit and limit the amount of the fee that landlords may pass on to tenants to 50 percent.

Election results

Santa Monica City Measure FS
Result		Votes	Percentage
a Yes		12,061	51.57%
No		11,325	48.43%

Election results via: Los Angeles County Elections Office

Text of measure

Ballot question

The question on the ballot:

“

Shall the City Charter be amended to establish a maximum annual registration fee of up to $288 per controlled rental unit and to limit the amount that landlords may pass through to tenants to 50% of the registration fee?

”

Impartial analysis

The following impartial analysis was prepared for Measure FS:

“	BALLOT MEASURE AMENDING THE CITY CHARTER TO AUTHORIZE THE RENT CONTROL BOARD TO IMPOSE A REGISTRATION FEE OF NO MORE THAN $288 PER CONTROLLED UNIT WITH HALF THE AMOUNT OF THE FEE TO BE PASSED THROUGH BY LANDLORDS TO TENANTS This measure, placed on the ballot by the City Council, would amend City Charter section 1803(n), governing registration fees for controlled rental housing units. Currently, that section authorizes the Rent Control Board to finance its reasonable and necessary expenses by charging landlords annual registration fees for controlled rental units in amounts the Board deems reasonable. Section 1803(n) also currently authorizes the Rent Control Board to annually establish the portion of the fee that landlords may pass through to tenants. The proposed measure would amend section 1803(n) by establishing an upper limit for the registration fee of $288 per controlled unit and by limiting to 50% the portion of the fee that may be passed through by the landlord. Existing language in section 1803(n) would continue to preclude the Rent Control Board from charging more than the amount necessary to finance its operations. This means that the Board cannot use the registration fee to generate revenue. It can only set the fee in an amount necessary to fund its costs. So, if the measure passes, the actual fee imposed by the Board in any given year could be significantly less than $288 per unit. But, it could not be more without voter approval. As to the pass through, the new language limiting it to 50% of the fee would, in effect, preclude the Rent Control Board from establishing a different percentage. Current law allows the Board to authorize landlords to pass through 100% of the registration fee to tenants; and, historically, that is what the Board authorized, until last year when the Board authorized a pass through of about 89% of the registration fee. In contrast, by mandating a 50% pass through, the proposed measure would effectively require that the cost of Rent Control Board operations be equally split between landlords and tenants. The measure also includes language clarifying that the Rent Control Board may establish conditions and procedures governing the pass through. Because it would clarify the Board's authority and impose specific limits on the exercise of its discretion, the proposed measure could help insulate the Rent Control Board from legal challenges to the registration fee.	”
—Santa Monica City Attorney

See also

• Local rent control on the ballot
• Local charter amendments on the ballot
• Local housing on the ballot
• Los Angeles County, California ballot measures
• November 4, 2014 ballot measures in California

External links

Suggest a link

• Los Angeles County Clerk and Recorder website