Colorado Taxpayer Bill of Rights, Initiative 1 (1992)
The Colorado Taxpayer Bill of Rights (TABOR), also known as Initiative 1, was on the November 3, 1992 ballot in Colorado as an initiated constitutional amendment, where it was approved. The famed measure, thought up by Douglas Bruce, requires statewide voter approval of tax increases that exceed an index created by combining inflation and population increases.
|Colorado Initiative 1 (1992)|
Election results via: Colorado State Legislative Council, Ballot History
Text of measure
- See also: Colorado State Constitution, Article X
The language appeared on the ballot as:
|“||Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado Constitution to require voter approval for certain state and local government tax revenue increases and debt; to restrict property, income, and other taxes; to limit the rate of increase in state and local government spending; to allow additional initiative and referendum elections; and to provide for the mailing of information to registered voters?||”|
Kerr v. Hickenlooper
- See also: Kerr v. Hickenlooper
A lawsuit regarding Initiative 1 will likely have far reaching effects for other TABOR laws around the country and direct democracy, in general. A lawsuit was filed with U.S. District Court in Denver, with plaintiffs arguing that the amendment is unconstitutional. The lawsuit was filed during the week of May 27, 2011 by 34 bipartisan plaintiffs, according to reports.
According to Doug Bruce, author of the citizen initiative, stated that if the lawsuit is successful in its efforts, it could allow lawmakers unlimited power, and could be extremely detrimental to citizen initiative efforts in the state of Colorado. Bruce stated: "This isn’t only attacking Colorado. The consequences of a ruling in their favor would invalidate the Constitution in all 50 states, and would also mean no limits on the federal government. We would have anarchy.”
However, one of the attorneys for the plaintiffs, David Skaggs, stated that the measure limits state legislators and conflicts with both the state and United States constitutions. Skaggs also argues that other initiatives have been overturned, but that it did not negatively affect the process. Skaggs commented: "Courts won’t reach beyond the narrow question presented. Yes, we got to this issue by initiative”, but the lawsuit targets TABOR and not citizens' initiatives.
The case's impact expanded significantly due to the consideration of a Guarantee Clause argument. In 2012, Colorado District Court Judge William J. Martínez ruled in favor of allowing the case to proceed. However, Martínez's ruling noted the history of seeing the Guarantee Clause as not justiciable or capable of judicial resolution, and said, "the Court determines that it cannot summarily conclude that Plaintiffs’ Guarantee Clause claim is per se non-justiciable"
The defense appealed the decision to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals. In March 2014, the court ruled that the case was justiciable. The court further denied a petition for rehearing en banc in July 2014. Some consider the case likely to reach the U.S. Supreme Court
- Colorado State Legislative Council, Ballot History
- I&R Institute ballot measure database for Colorado
- Colorado Statesman, "Springs Council rethinks TABOR repeal," January 16, 2009
- Colorado State Legislative Council, "Ballot History," accessed February 20, 2014
- Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.
- Colorado Statesman, "Lawsuit aims to toss TABOR amendment," May 27, 2011
- Kerr v. Hickenlooper (D. Colo. 2012)
- Excess of Democracy, "BREAKING: TENTH CIRCUIT FINDS GUARANTEE CLAUSE CLAIM JUSTICIABLE," March 7, 2014
- Excess of Democracy, "BREAKING: OVER FOUR DISSENTS, 10TH CIRCUIT DENIES EN BANC HEARING IN GUARANTEE CLAUSE CASE," July 22, 2014
State of Colorado
|State executive officers||
Governor | Lieutenant Governor | Attorney General | Secretary of State | Treasurer | Commissioner of Education | Commissioner of Insurance | Commissioner of Agriculture | Executive Director of Natural Resources | Executive Director of Labor and Employment | Chair of Public Utilities |