For status updates, visit lucyburns.org.
Ballotpedia's coverage of elections held on March 3, 2015, was limited. Select races were covered live, and all results will be added once the merger is complete.
- 1 History
- 2 Function
- 3 Arguments in favor of the Electoral College
- 4 Arguments against the Electoral College
- 5 Recent news
- 6 See also
- 7 External links
- 8 References
The Electoral College is the process through which the President of the United States is elected to office. The process was formed as a compromise between allowing either the United States Congress or popular vote to determine the outcome of presidential elections. Each state receives a number of votes equal to the total number of their delegation to the United States Congress. The vote casters, known as electors, are chosen by rules differing in each state, but many are elected during each party's state conventions. All states other than Maine and Nebraska give all the state's votes to the winner of the popular vote in their state. The winners in Maine and Nebraska receive two votes - representing the state's Senators - while the remaining votes can be split between candidates.
There are a total of 538 electors among the 50 states, including three votes allotted to the District of Columbia. Of the 538 votes, a candidate must win at least 270 to become President of the United States.
The Framers of the Constitution struggled to determine an effective way of electing a president and debated between a number of options, each with its own issues in a developing nation. Direct election from eligible voters, Congress electing the president and allowing state legislatures to vote for a president were the most debated options. The issues raised with each option were as follows:
- Direct election: Communication and transportation made campaigning nearly impossible, meaning candidates in highly populated areas would be favored due to local recognition.
- Congressional election: It was thought a Congressional election would lead to discontent in Congress and could lead to political bargaining and be susceptible to international influences.
- State legislature election: It was thought an election by state legislatures would lead to the erosion of federal powers because the president would show favor to the electors.
The Framers came up with a compromise by creating the Electoral College. Electors, a number equal to each states' Congressional delegation, would be chosen to cast the votes for president. Each elector was given two votes, with the candidate with the second highest vote total elected vice president. Each state's legislature was permitted to form the rules on how the electors were chosen. Among the original rules of the Electoral College were:
- Electors were to meet separately in their states in order to mitigate brokering political deals.
- Electors did not gather together to cast their votes.
- At least one of the candidates had to be chosen from a state other than the elector's.
- A vote equaling at least the majority of the number of the electors was required to elect a president.
- The United States Congress set the dates to meet electors.
In the Constitution
The Framers included the formation of the Electoral College in Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution. The section originally read as follows:
Note: The following text is a transcription of the Constitution in its original form. Sections that are linked have since been amended or superseded.
The original rules did not establish separate votes for president and vice president, only ruling the winner president and runner-up vice president. In 1796, political parties began running on joint tickets, specifying president and vice president. This caused the electors to have to agree on voting for a presidential candidate and vice presidential candidate, but refrain from casting at least one of their votes for the vice president in order to achieve the party's goal. One elector did not hold their vote in 1800, resulting in a tie between Thomas Jefferson and his running mate Aaron Burr. The tie went to the United States House of Representatives to be resolved, which led to the passage of the 12th Amendment.
- Each state's electors were to meet in one location, but separate from other states' delegations.
- The "safe harbor" provision was added. The provision provided that if a state's results were disputed and the state's legislature passed a procedure to resolve the issue, an finalized agreement can be made within six days prior to the election.
- Votes for president and vice president were cast as separate ballots, and holding true to the Constitution, one of the votes must be for someone outside of the elector's state.
The 12th Amendment reads as follows:
Note: The following text is a transcription of the Constitution in its original form. Sections that are linked have since been amended or superseded.
|“||The Electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate; -- the President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted; -- The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President. The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States."||”|
The 23rd Amendment was ratified in 1961. The amendment allocated electoral votes to the District of Columbia equal to the number of delegates it would have if it were a state, but not to exceed the number of votes given to the least populated state.
The 23rd Amendment reads as follows:
The District constituting the seat of Government of the United States shall appoint in such manner as Congress may direct:
A number of electors of President and Vice President equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives in Congress to which the District would be entitled if it were a State, but in no event more than the least populous State; they shall be in addition to those appointed by the States, but they shall be considered, for the purposes of the election of President and Vice President, to be electors appointed by a State; and they shall meet in the District and perform such duties as provided by the twelfth article of amendment.
Selection of elector candidates
Each state is charged with establishing how electors are chosen. The only people barred from serving as electors by the Constitution are those who hold an "Office of Trust or Profit under the United States," including members of the legislature and judiciary, federal law enforcement officers and military personnel and other public employees of the federal government.
Thirty-two states use state party conventions to nominate major party candidates to the position of elector. Five states use the state party's central committee to nominate candidates. Other methods include nomination by governor, nominations based on unspecified party, the use of primary elections and by the state's preferred presidential candidate. Minor party candidates have different state specified nominations.
Election of electors
Originally, the electors were chosen by the legislators in each state. However, voters now choose all electors nationwide. When voters go to the polls on election day, they cast votes for the electors who are nominated for each presidential candidate's party. In 48 of the 50 states, a "winner-take-all" system is used to determine where all of the state's electoral votes will go. Whichever party's electors receive the most votes get to allocate all of the state's votes to their chosen candidate for both president and vice president. The exceptions to the "winner-take-all" system are Maine and Nebraska. These states split the votes based on districts.
The Constitution does not require electors to vote for their pledged candidate or even party if their party wins the popular vote, but some states require electors to vote according to the popular vote or vote according to their political pledges. Electors who choose to go against their pledged votes are known as "faithless electors." In these states, electors who do not vote according to their pledges can be fined or their votes can be nullified and replaced by the party. In United States history, no elector has voted against their pledge, so the Supreme Court has no precedent as to whether "faithless electors" can be prosecuted. States that have laws punishing "faithless elector," including the District of Columbia, are as follows:
The following states have no requirements obligating voters to vote for their pledged candidates:
There are 538 electors in the Electoral College process. Each state is allocated one electoral vote for every member of their congressional delegation, meaning one for each member of the U.S. House and one for each of their two Senators. The District of Columbia is allocated votes under the 23rd Amendment as if they were a state, meaning two votes representing Senators, and more votes determined by its population. However, the number of votes for the District of Columbia cannot exceed that of the least populated state. The District is currently allocated three votes. California is the most populated state and holds 55 votes.
Arguments in favor of the Electoral College
Geographically distributed national support
Since no single region contains a majority of electoral votes, candidates cannot win by focusing only on regional issues while leaving other areas of the country out. It also encourages a candidate to select a running mate from a different region in order to build coalitions of states while campaigning. Those who support this theory suggest that even more important that winning a majority vote, is the ability to gain wide distribution of support across the country. In the event that the popular vote is very close, the thought is that the candidate with a wider distribution of support would beat a candidate with more popular support.
Enhanced minority influence
In states with concentrations of ethnic and racial minorities or special interest groups, often being states with high numbers of electoral votes, winning over those groups can swing an election due to the "winner-takes-all" system in the Electoral College. The votes of minority groups can carry more influence than their amount of votes would suggest.
Two party system stability
For a third party to win the presidency, they would need to have enough electoral votes to prevent a majority to any candidate and have enough U.S. House support to be elected over the two major party candidates. Because of this, the Electoral College process essentially forces third party voters to merge into one of the two major parties. Likewise, the two major parties, seeking the votes to win the election can mold their platforms to gain the votes of third party movements. The goal is to have two parties representing the centers of their respective platforms. Supporters of this theory suggest that extremists would have more incentive to campaign if the elections were based solely on popular vote, because if runoff elections were required to win the presidency, parties would tend toward more radical platforms to gain more support.
Maintains federal system of representation
As a requirement by the federal system of the United States, certain responsibilities must be left up to the states when it comes to representation in the federal government. The structure of the Electoral College provides the states the ability to determine the outcome of presidential elections, due to its similar setup to the United States House of Representatives and United States Senate, balancing the power of smaller states with that of the most populous.
Arguments against the Electoral College
Chance of majority candidate losing
There are three possible ways a presidential candidate could lose the popular vote but still be elected as president.
- If three candidates split the electoral votes in a way that none reach the majority required, either one candidate would have to withdraw from the race and give the support of his electors to another candidate, or the U.S. House of Representatives would be charged with electing the president, per the 12th Amendment.
- If one candidate's support was heavily concentrated in more populous states, but another candidate's support is spread out geographically and by only a slim majority, a candidate receiving only a minority of the popular vote could win the electoral vote.
- If a third party received enough votes that no candidate gets more than 50% of the popular vote, candidates can still be elected by a majority electoral vote. This is not uncommon in U.S. history and has happened 15 times.
- In 1824, four candidates split the electoral college vote in a way that none received the majority. John Quincy Adams was elected president by the House even though Andrew Jackson received more electoral votes.
- In 1836, the Whig Party ran three candidates in different areas of the country. Their thought was that the local candidates would win their party the majority of electoral votes at which time, they would choose amongst themselves who would be president. The Democratic-Republican candidate, Martin Van Buren, won the majority electoral vote and the presidency.
- In 1876, Samuel J. Tilden won the popular vote but lost the electoral majority by one vote to Rutherford B. Hayes.
- In 1888, Grover Cleveland won the popular vote but lost the electoral majority to Benjamin Harrison.
- In 2000, Al Gore won the popular vote but lost the electoral majority to George W. Bush.
"Faithless electors" possibility
While a "faithless elector" has never changed the outcome of an election, there have been seven instances of an elector casting a vote for a candidate other than for the one they pledged. This was often attributed not to the elector trying to sway the election a certain way but in trying to make a statement due to the rarity of the occurrence.
Depressed voter turnout
Since a candidate with a majority of the popular vote can still lose a presidential election, some argue it creates a disincentive to participate in the presidential election. No matter how high the voter turnout is, the state still receives the same amount of electoral votes for a presidential candidate. Others do not believe this is an issue because of the other offices at stake during any particular election day, from state offices to U.S. House and Senate seats.
Inaccurate reflection of the population
Because each state has a minimum of three electoral votes, votes from those in the least populated states count more toward the electoral vote than votes from those in more populous states. For instance, in 1988, the seven least populated states combined to count for as many electoral votes as Florida, yet the total population of those states was more than 6.5 million than that of Florida at 9.6 million voters.
Another example of the failure to provide an accurate reflection of the population is when it comes to third party candidates. If a third party candidate does not carry a majority in any state, they could carry a significant minority of the popular vote throughout the country, but they may not get a single electoral vote in the election.
This section displays the most recent stories in a Google news search for the term U.S. + Electoral + College
- All stories may not be relevant to this page due to the nature of the search engine.
- United States Constitution
- United States House of Representatives
- Possible presidential candidates, 2016
- Archives.gov, "What is the Electoral College?," accessed February 11, 2014
- Archives.gov, "Who are the electors?," accessed February 11, 2014
- Federal Election Commission, "The Electoral College," accessed February 11, 2014
- Congressional Research Service, "The Electoral College: How It Works in Contemporary Presidential Elections," October 22, 2012
- Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.
- U.S. Electoral College, "Presidential election laws," accessed February 20, 2014
- FactCheck.org, "Presidents Winning Without Popular Vote," March 24, 2008