Vote button trans.png
April's Project of the Month
It's spring time. It's primary election season!
Click here to find all the information you'll need to cast your ballot.




Eyman signature privacy case dismissed, R-71 challenge returns to court in 2011

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

November 22, 2010

Scalesofjustice.jpg

OLYMPIA, Washington: Signature privacy cases that developed in 2009 are slowly coming to a close. This last week the Thurston County Superior Court dismissed a case brought by Tim Eyman and James Bopp. Earlier this year, the court dissolved an injunction on the release of the petition signatures with the exemption of Washington Referendum 71 (2009).[1]

Eyman had filed a lawsuit to block the release of petition signatures relating to approximately 11 initiatives (including 2009's I-1033).[2] He argued that the signers' identities were protected by the freedom of speech.[3] In reaction to the court's dismissal of the case Eyman said, "We’ll continue to monitor the federal lawsuit and pursue other ways to counter this injustice. For 95 years in Washington state, petition signers’ personal information was protected. Let’s hope there comes a day when we can return to that common sense policy."[4]

This summer the United States Supreme Court ruled 8-1 enforcing Washington's Public Records Act; making petition signatures public. Following the June 24, 2010 ruling, anti-gay marriage activists renewed their efforts to ban the release of R-71 petitions. According to the federal court motion, they asked for either a preliminary injunction or a temporary restraining order to block the release of the petitions. They cite the possibility for harassment should the signatures be released. U.S. District Court Judge Benjamin Settle announced in November 2010 that he would hear the challenge on May 31, 2011.[5][6]

See also

Ballotpedia News

References