Federal Communications Commission

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Federal Communications Commission
US-FCC-Seal.svg
Chair:Tom Wheeler
Year created:1934
Official website:Office website
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is a United States executive agency formed in 1934 which "regulates interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite and cable in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and U.S. territories."[1] The current chair of the commission is Tom Wheeler, who was confirmed to the post on October 29, 2013.[2] The FCC is an independent agency overseen by the United States Congress.[1]

History

Founded in 1934 by the Communications Act, the FCC took over radio licensing from the Federal Radio Commission. In 1940, the commission released a report that led to the breakup of the National Broadcasting Company (NBC), eventually leading to the formation of the American Broadcasting Company (ABC). The Report on Chain Broadcasting also placed restrictions on what the networks could demand from local affiliate stations in regard to scheduling programming. When television became a new medium in the 1940s, the FCC took on the role of licensing those stations as well. The FCC also makes rulings on matters of "indecency" in television and radio programming. In 2009, the FCC began to forward the idea of "net neutrality" rules aimed at ensuring equal treatment of all internet users. The rules then faced a series of legal challenges.[3]

Structure

Mission

According to its official website, the FCC's mission statement is as follows:

The Federal Communications Commission regulates interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite and cable in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and U.S. territories.[4]

—FCC.gov, [1]

Leadership

The current chair of the FCC is Tom Wheeler.[2] The other commissioners are Mignon Clyburn, Jessica Rosenworcel, Ajit Pai and Michael O'Reilly.[5]

Issues

Obama administration

Washington Redskins radio license

John Banzhaf, law professor at George Washington University, opened a case on September 2, 2014, against Washington Redskins team owner Dan Snyder with the FCC over a license the team had for a radio station broadcast that contained the word "Redskins." Banzhaf argued that under the FCC's "obscenity" rules, the station should no longer be allowed its license. He claimed that prior FCC commissioners set a precedent against racial terms and that the rule was that "the unnecessary and repeated on-air use of that derogatory racist word is contrary to current federal law and akin to broadcasting obscenity."[6]

While FCC Commissioner Tom Wheeler stated in response on September 10, 2014, "I don't use the term personally and I think it is offensive and derogatory," he also would not commit to using the power of the FCC to force a name change. He explained, "I think it would be great if the Washington football team would recognize those kinds of changes itself. I hope that this is something that if enough people express themselves, Dan Snyder can see which way things are going."[7]

Sporting event blackout rules

On August 12, 2014, republican FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai called for the FCC to remove the rules that force cable and satellite television providers to black out sporting events if they're blacked out in the local market. Pai suggested the blackout rules favor the interests of team owners because games get blacked out in local markets when a certain threshold of seats were not sold. He explained, "The FCC shouldn’t get involved in handing out special favors or picking winners and losers. And in my view, there is no reason for the FCC to be involved in the sports blackout business. ... Our job is to serve the public interest, not the private interests of team owners."[8] The National Football League began increasing lobbying efforts in early August as an attempt to keep the rules in place, writing letters and setting up meetings with the FCC. Pointing out that only 2 of the 256 NFL games in 2013-2014 were blacked out, the league argued that the rules were an important aspect of their drive to sell more game tickets since they took effect in 1975. Lawyers for the NFL explained, "Although the League has taken a variety of steps to accomplish that goal, the blackout rule has been a critical contributing factor to that success."[9]

Richard Trumka, head of the AFL-CIO labor union, came out against Pai's proposal of eliminating the blackout rules, saying the change "would have a significant negative impact — not only on union members, but also on sports fans, local communities and the public at large."[10] Thirteen members of the Congressional Black Caucus also opposed the change, claiming that some games might not be hosted on free broadcast television stations, making it more difficult for fans to watch their favorite teams. The opposing members sent a letter to the FCC in July arguing their case, "We are concerned with the FCC’s proposal to eliminate the sports blackout rule and undermine the ability of sports programming, particularly NFL games, to remain widely available on free television."[11]

FCC vote

Commissioner Wheeler announced September 9, 2014, that there would likely be an FCC vote on the sports blackout rule by the end of September 2014. The vote would determine whether or not the commission would keep the rule on the books. Wheeler wrote in an op-ed, "With the first weekend of professional football in the books, two things should be abundantly clear: The NFL is king; and the Federal Communication Commission's sports blackout rules are obsolete and have to go."[12]

Open Internet

On May 15, 2014, the FCC voted 3-2, along party lines, to pass new rules regarding net neutrality. The idea behind net neutrality is that internet service providers treat all content equally. The new rules proposed a "fast lane" be offered to larger content managers for a fee to ensure that internet providers do not purposefully slow down the data coming from the high bandwidth content managers like Google, Facebook or Netflix. FCC Commissioner Tom Wheeler defended the new rules, stating, "The potential for there to be some kind of a fast lane available to only a few has many people concerned. Personally, I don't like the idea that the Internet could be divided into haves and have nots, and I will work to see that that does not happen. In this item we specifically ask whether and how to prevent the kind of paid prioritization that could result in fast lanes."[13]

Opponents of the new rule claim they will have the opposite effect of neutrality, stifling competition for new companies. Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) claimed, "The very essence of net neutrality is that a better idea or service should be allowed to succeed on its merits and not have to pay tolls to reach potential customers. Rules allowing pay-to-play deals would also harm consumers, who could no longer be confident that the Internet speeds they pay for are sufficient to access the services they want."[13]

The rules were open for comments by the public for a period of four months, at which point the FCC made its ruling. Public comments on the rules closed September 25, 2014. [14]

"Internet Slowdown"

Companies such as Netflix, Etsy, Kickstarter and Reddit teamed up with non-profit organizations like the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Demand Progress on September 10, 2014, in an attempt to raise awareness prior to the end of the open commenting period set by the FCC on net neutrality rules. The companies opposed the new rules written by Commissioner Wheeler and changed ads and banners on their websites to show messages such as, "If there were Internet slow lanes, you’d still be waiting."[15] Public comments on the topic surpassed that of any prior topic's comments the same day, gaining more attention than the Whitney Houston "wardrobe malfunction" during the 2004 Super Bowl. The record was previously 1.4 million comments. According to the Sunlight Foundation, about two-thirds of the comments submitted supported the reclassification of internet access to be more like public utilities, while only one percent of commenters were estimated to be directly opposed to net neutrality.[16]

Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) announced his support of the "Internet Slowdown" and added a similar banner to his website. In a statement, Markey said, "Today, I stand in solidarity with the ‘net-izens’ of the world to show what the Internet would look like with fast and slow lanes. An open Internet enables freedom of expression and the sharing of ideas across town or across the globe. That openness is at stake if the FCC allows broadband behemoths to play traffic cop, discriminating against some, while letting those who can afford to sail on by."[17]

Controversies

Democratic donor waiver probe

On July 31, 2014, House Republicans began a probe into an FCC waiver given to Grain Management, a private equity firm. Reps. Fred Upton (R-MI), Greg Walden (R-OR) and Tim Murphy (R-PA) claimed the company may have received special treatment because the head of the company, David Grain, donated $5,000 to President Barack Obama's 2012 campaign as well as thousands more to other Democratic candidates. The congressmen wrote a letter to FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler stating, "The Energy and Commerce Committee is committed to conducting vigorous oversight to ensure that Commission processes are fair, open, and transparent, and that they serve the public interest. The granting of the Grain Management waiver raises questions about these processes." They also requested any communications between Grain and the FCC prior to the waiver being issued in June 2014. An FCC spokesperson defended the waiver in a statement, claiming, "The Commission’s action, which followed a period of public notice and comment, is consistent with Congress’s directive to design auctions that encourage participation among a wide variety of companies, including small businesses,” he said in a statement. “We stand ready to act as a resource to Congress as we continue to address this important issue.[18]

Recent news

This section displays the most recent stories in a Google news search for the term Federal + Communications + Commission

All stories may not be relevant to this page due to the nature of the search engine.

Federal Communications Commission News Feed

  • Loading...

See also

External links

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Federal Communications Commission, "What We Do," accessed May 12, 2014
  2. 2.0 2.1 New York Times, "New Chief of the F.C.C. Is Confirmed," October 29, 2014
  3. AllGov, "Federal Communications Commission," accessed May 12, 2014
  4. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.
  5. Federal Communications Commission, "FCC Leadership," accessed May 12, 2014
  6. Broadcasting and Cable, "Exclusive: Snyder's WWXX-FM License Challenged Over 'Redskins'," September 2, 2014
  7. Broadcasting and Cable, "FCC's Wheeler: 'Redskins' Name Is Offensive, Should Go," September 10, 2014
  8. The Hill, "FCC commissioner: End sports blackout rules," August 12, 2014
  9. The Hill, "NFL blitzes FCC to save blackout rule," August 8, 2014
  10. The Hill, "Labor union goes to bat for sports blackout rule," August 28, 2014
  11. The Hill, "Black lawmakers push to save sports blackout rule," August 20, 2014
  12. The Hill, "FCC to kill sports blackout rule," September 9, 2014
  13. 13.0 13.1 Politico, "FCC vote: Net neutrality with a ‘fast lane,'" May 15, 2014
  14. The Hill, "FCC extends net neutrality comment window," August 18, 2014
  15. The Hill, "Netflix, Reddit stage ‘Internet slowdown’ to protest new rules," September 10, 2014
  16. The Hill, "'Fast lanes’ backlash sets FCC record," September 10, 2014
  17. The Hill, "Dem senator joins net neutrality protest," September 10, 2014
  18. The Hill, "GOP lawmakers launch probe into FCC’s waiver for Obama donor," July 31, 2014