Hartig v. City of Seattle

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Ballot law
BallotLaw final.png
State laws
Initiative law
Recall law
Statutory changes
Ballot Law Update
Current edition
Court cases
Lawsuit news
Ballot access rulings
Recent court cases
Petitioner access
Ballot title challenges
Superseding initiatives
Signature challenges
Local ballot measure laws
Hartig v. City of Seattle is a 1909 decision of the Washington Supreme Court considering whether Washington's newly-enacted I&R laws violated the federal constitution.

They stated: "[I]t can scarcely be contended that this plan is inconsistent with a republican form of government, the central idea of which is a government by the people. Whether the expression of the will of the people is made directly by their own acts or through representatives chosen by them is not material. The important consideration is a full expression."

A similar (but federal) lawsuit in 1912 before the U.S. Supreme Court, Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph v. State of Oregon, determined that Oregon's I&R law was consistent with the federal constitution.