Indiana Access to Public Records Act

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Find your State
Sunshine Laws
Open Records laws
Open Meetings Laws
How to Make Records Requests
Sunshine Legislation
Sorted by State, Year and Topic
Sunshine Litigation
Sorted by State, Year and Topic
Sunshine Nuances
Private Agencies, Public Dollars
Deliberative Process Exemption

The Indiana Access to Public Records Act is a series of laws designed to guarantee that the public has access to public records of government bodies at all levels in Indiana.

The Indiana Open Door Law legislates the methods by which public meetings are conducted.

To learn more about how to make a public records request in this state, please see: Indiana FOIA procedures.

Relevant legal cases

See also: Court cases with an impact on state FOIA and Indiana sunshine lawsuits

Here is a list of lawsuits in Indiana (to order them by year, please click the icon to the right of the "year" heading).

Lawsuit Year
Gallagher v. Marion County Victim Advocate Program, Inc. 1980
Indiana Civil Liberties Union v. Indiana Gen. Assembly 1986
Indianapolis Convention & Visitors Ass'n Inc. v. Indianapolis Newspapers, Inc. 1991
Indianapolis Star v. Trustees of Indiana University 2003
Pigman v. Evansville Press 1989
Riggin v. Board of Trustees of Ball State University 1986
State ex rel. Colescott v. King 1900

Proposed changes


See also: Proposed reforms in state sunshine laws, 2009

Senate Bill 232

Senate Bill 232 was passed by the Indiana Senate Committee on Local Government and the full Senate and was referred to the House on February 24, 2009 .[1][2] The bill provided for civil penalties of up to $500 against government agencies -- or their individual employees -- that violate Indiana's Public Records Act or Open Door Law.[2] This bill would have allowed public agencies or workers who were deemed to have violated the Public Records Act or the Open Door Law to be fined by a judge.[2] Officers or employees of the agencies that are found to be in violation of one of these acts and are thereby assessed fines would pay out of pocket.[2] Any fines assessed against government agencies, however, would be paid by the agencies' budgets.[2]

The bill also proposed to allow employees and agencies to provide notice of meetings to individuals that request such notice annually.[2] That notice may be provided via email or on the state agency's website 48 hours prior to the meeting.[2] This advance notice was already available to news organizations, and the bill proposed extending the privilege to all citizens.

The bill would also have allowed government agencies to keep information regarding minors under the age of 19 confidential.[2] The bill proposed the creation of an education fund to provide training for the public and for public officials as to their responsibilities under public access law.[2] Finally, the bill proposed that where a formal complaint is filed regarding the unavailability of a document or redactions within a document, a "public access counselor" should review the records to determine whether the elimination of information violates public access laws.[2]

Reaction to the bill

The bill received a negative response from various groups representing elected officials at the local level, including the Indiana Association of Cities and Towns and the Association of Indiana Counties. They argued that the proposed meeting notifications were too time consuming for local governing agencies to comply with and that the bill may subject government employees to liability and fines for denying open record requests at the direction of their superiors.[3][4]

The bill received support from representatives of the Hoosier State Press Association, citizen activists and journalists. In support of the bill, they argued that until recently there had not been any enforcement measures to deal with a government agency that refused to comply with the law.

Tony Fargo, associate professor of the Indiana University School of Journalism, testified in favor of the bill before the Senate's Local Government Committee.[5] The Indiana Tribune-Star, Palladium-Item and all endorsed the bill.[6][7]

Senate Bill 32

Senate Bill 32, having to do with notice of meetings, is related to Senate Bill 232.[8] The bill was referred to the Committee on Commerce and Public Policy & Interstate Cooperation.[9] The bill would have reuqired government agencies to provide notice of meetings to anyone who requests such notice annually.[9] According to the proposed bill, notice may be given by mail five days in advance for any non-emergency meetings for a $10 fee annually.[9]

Senate Bill 1230

Senate Bill 1230, having to do with notice of meetings, was passed by the Senate Committee on Local Government.[10] The bill included proposals to require newspapers that publish notice of meetings to include the notice on their website and a proposal to eliminate the requirement for agencies to publish the ordinance setting the salaries of elected city officers.[10]

Senate Bill 1280

Senate Bill 1280 was passed by the Committee on Ways and Means and the full House and has since been referred to the Senate Committee on Tax and Fiscal Policy.[11][11] If passed, the bill would have required state agencies to report budget information to the state auditor's office so that it could begin to make available online all state expenditures and account balances no later than July 1, 2009.[11]

Indiana's transparency report card

A 2008 study, BGA - Alper Integrity Index, conducted by the Better Government Association and sponsored by Alper Services, ranked Indiana #29 in the nation with an overall percentage of 51.10%.[12]

A 2007 study, Graded state responsiveness to FOI requests, conducted by BGA and the NFOIC, gave Indiana 59 points out of a possible 100, a letter grade of "F" and a ranking of 14 out of the 50 states.[13]

A 2002 study, Freedom of Information in the USA, conducted by IRE and BGA, ranked Indiana's law as the 13th best in the country, giving it a letter grade of "C."[14]

Features of the law

Sunshine variations Compare States: Sunshine variations
Click on the heading to compare your state's law to other state's transparency laws.

Declared legal intention

See also: Declared legal intentions across the U.S.

The Indiana Access to Public Records Act states, "A fundamental philosophy of the American constitutional form of representative government is that government is the servant of the people and not their master. Accordingly, it is the public policy of the state that all persons are entitled to full and complete information regarding the affairs of government and the official acts of those who represent them as public officials and employees. Providing persons with the information is an essential function of a representative government and an integral part of the routine duties of public officials and employees, whose duty it is to provide the information."[15]

What records are covered?

See also: Defining public records

The act defines public records as essentially any information created, maintained or filed by government agencies.[16]


Exemptions include:

  • Trade secrets
  • Confidentially information received upon request
  • Academic research
  • Licensing information
  • Medical records
  • Anything declared exempt by the Supreme Court
  • Autopsy photos or videos
  • Social Security numbers
  • Law enforcement investigation
  • Attorney information, when they represent a public agency
  • "Records that are intra-agency or interagency advisory or deliberative material, including material developed by a private contractor under a contract with a public agency, that are expressions of opinion or are of a speculative nature, and that are communicated for the purpose of decision making"[16]
  • Personal files of employees excluding "the name, compensation, job title, business address, business telephone number, job description, education and training background, previous work experience, or dates of first and last employment of present or former officers or employees of the agency" as well as disciplinary information[16]
  • Names of charitable donors if the donor requires nondisclosure of the donor's identity as a condition of making the gift
  • Library records
  • Security measures for telecommunications, schools, and general infrastructure
  • Correctional officer information
  • Complaint information within law enforcement agencies as well as job descriptions for officers
  • Contact information for utility employees
  • Labor negotiations

However, agencies are required by statute to separate disclosable and non-disclosable information in one source and release the non-exempt material.

Deliberative process exemption

See also: Deliberative process exemption and Deliberative process exemption - Indiana

What agencies are covered?

See also: Defining public body

The act defines agencies as any division of the state government including executive, administrative, judicial, or legislative power, as well as all political subdivisions and any organization whose budget is up for review by state officials. The only clear exemptions are medical staffs and committees associated with those staffs, agencies who receive funds from the government in exchange for goods and services.[16]


See also: Legislatures and transparency

While the Indiana Access to Public Records Act includes state legislative bodies within its definition of public body found at Indiana APRA 5-14-3-2-M, 5-14-3-2.1, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled in State ex rel. Masariu v. Marion Superior Court that they are unable to enforce the law against the legislature due to separation of powers considerations.[17]

Private governmental agencies

See also: Private agency, public dollars and Private agency, public dollars - IndianaAny private entity that is supported through public funds is considered a public body and is subject to the act.[18]

Public universities

See also: Universities and open records

The definition of public body presumably includes the administrative capacities of public universities within the state. However, academic research, grade transcripts and the names of anonymous charitable donors are explicitly exempted under Indiana APRA 5-14-3.

Who may request records?

See also: List of who can make public record requests by state

Any person may request public records in Indiana. "[A]ll persons are entitled to full and complete information regarding the affairs of government."[19]

Must a purpose be stated?

See also: States requiring a statement of purpose

The Indiana APRA specifically states that no request may be refused due to a lack of statement of purpose.[20]

How can records be used?

See also: Record use restrictions

Exempted from the commercial use clause are news publications, academic research, and non-profit organization activities. Further, certain lists of names and addresses and email addresses cannot be used for political or commercial purposes, specifically government employee lists, conference attendees lists and lists of students attending public schools.

Time allowed for response

See also: Request response times by state

The Indiana statute allows for seven days to process APRA requests.[21]

Fees for records

See also: How much do public records cost? and Sunshine laws and search fees

The statute only permits fees to be charged for the actual cost of duplication, with a minimum cost of $0.10 per copy.[22]

The statute also allows for exemptions for requestors only if:

  1. Public agency program support.
  2. Nonprofit activities.
  3. Journalism.
  4. Academic research.

Role of the Attorney General

See also: Role of the Attorney General

There is currently no provision within the state open records law that empowers the State Department of Law to enforce the right of the public to access governmental records. Those denied access to public records are advised under the Act to seek remedy by filing suit in any court of competent jurisdiction within the state.

Open meetings

"It is the intent of this chapter that the official action of public agencies be conducted and taken openly, unless otherwise expressly provided by statute, in order that the people may be fully informed."[23]

See also

External links