School Board badge.png
Election Day in New Jersey!
Nine school board seats are up for grabs in Edison, Newark and Passaic!





Kansas City Ordinance Amendment Questions, 2 (August 2010)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Two Kansas City Ordinance Amendment Questions were on the August 3, 2010 ballot in the city of Kansas City which is in Cass County.

Both measures were defeated

The first ordinance amendment would have been to ordinance 100301 and would have changed it so that an annual fee on waste tire sites would be imposed for inspection purposes.

  • YES 1 (11.11%)
  • NO 8 (88.89%)Defeatedd

The question on the ballot:

This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.

For the purpose of reimbursing the City for expenses related to the regulation, inspection and issuance of permits for tire dealers and waste tire sites, shall the City of Kansas City, Missouri, be authorized to charge an annual fee of $250.00 for each tire dealer permit and each waste tire site permit, including renewals, and charge a fee of $100.00, that may be adjusted annually by the Consumer Price Index, for second and subsequent re-inspections of any tire dealer or waste tire site after failure of an annual or complaint inspection and the first re-inspection?

The second ordinance amendment would have been to ordinance 100309 and would have reimbursed the city for expenses paid for property maintenance and implement a fee for those who do not follow the maintenance time frame.[1]

  • YES 2 (22.22%)
  • NO 7 (77.78%)Defeatedd[2]

The question on the ballot:

This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.

For the purpose of reimbursing the City for expenses related to the enforcement of nuisance and property maintenance ordinances, shall the City of Kansas City, Missouri, be authorized to charge a $75.00 reinspection fee (for each re-inspection), that may be adjusted annually by the Consumer Price Index, to a violator who fails to correct the nuisance or property maintenance violations within the time frame provided in the written notice, to be used exclusively to provide funding that will supplement current funding for enforcement of nuisance and property maintenance ordinances so funding shall not be reduced below the amounts in the Fiscal Year 2010 - 11 Budget, unless overall percentage reductions are imposed on all other General Fund supported City departments?

References