Breaking News: Ballotpedia partners with White House and Congressional leadership to sponsor Affordable Stare Act (ASA)

Massachusetts State Consultant Limitation Initiative, Question 2 (1990)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Voting on
Administration of Government
Administration of government.jpg
Ballot Measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot

The Massachusetts State Consultant Limitation Initiative, also known as Question 2, was a citizen initiative on the November 6, 1990 ballot in Massachusetts, where it was defeated.

The initiative sought to limit the state's use of consultants.

Election results

Question 2 (State Consultant Limitation)
Defeatedd No1,246,73951.4%
Yes 1,038,174 42.8%

Official results via: The Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth

Text of measure

The summary of the proposal on the ballot was:

The proposed law would place restrictions on the State's use of consultants. It would place various limits on the amount of profit, overhead charges and expenses that the State could pay consultants. It would limit the duration of consultant contracts to two years and any extension to one year, and it would limit the degree to which such contracts could be changed to require payments in excess of the original contract. The proposed law would limit to $100,000 the amount the State could pay on a consultant contract with an individual and would require all other consultant contracts in excess of $25,000 to be sought through competitive bidding. It would prohibit consultants form supervising State employees, and it would limit the use of consultants as substitutes for State employee positions.

In addition, the proposed law would place limits on the total amount of money State agencies, departments and Authorities could spend on consultants each year. Subsidiary provisions would also establish a method for these entities to gradually come into compliance with the new spending limits and would give authority to the State Secretary of Administration and Finance, on request, to permit some spending in excess of the new limits. The proposed law would also require State agencies, departments and Authorities as well as the Secretary of Administration and Finance to submit yearly reports concerning the State's consultant contracts to certain legislative committees and to the Inspector General.

Finally, the proposed law provides that any of its provisions, if found by a court to be unconstitutional or otherwise unlawful, would be severed from the law and the remaining provisions would continue in effect.[1][2]

See also

External links

Suggest a link


  1. Secretary of the Commonwealth, Public Document No. 43 Massachusetts Election Statistics 1990
  2. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.