Montana Late Voter Registration Revision Measure, LR-126 (2014)
- 1 Text of measure
- 2 Support
- 3 Opposition
- 4 Media editorial positions
- 5 Related lawsuits
- 6 Path to the ballot
- 7 See also
- 8 External links
- 9 References
The Montana Late Voter Registration Revision Measure, LR-126 is on the November 4, 2014 ballot in Montana as a legislatively-referred state statute. The measure, upon voter approval, would change the deadline for late voter registration from poll closing on Election Day to 5:00 p.m. on the Friday before election day.
Text of measure
The official ballot text reads as follows:
|“||LEGISLATIVE REFERENDUM NO. 126
AN ACT PROTECTING THE INTEGRITY OF MONTANA ELECTIONS BY ENDING LATE VOTER REGISTRATION ON THE FRIDAY BEFORE ELECTION DAY AND ELIMINATING ELECTION DAY REGISTRATION; ENSURING COMPLIANCE WITH THE NATIONAL VOTER REGISTRATION ACT; PROVIDING THAT THE PROPOSED ACT BE SUBMITTED TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF MONTANA AT THE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN NOVEMBER 2014; AMENDING SECTIONS 13-2-301, 13-2-304, 13-19-207, AND 61-5-107, MCA; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
The 2013 Legislature submitted this proposal for a vote. LR-126 changes the deadline for late voter registration from the close of polls on election day to 5:00 p.m. on the Friday before the election. LR-126 also moves the deadline for changes to an elector's voter registration information from the close of polls on election day to 5:00 p.m. on the Friday before the election. The National Voter Registration Act referenced in the title of LR-126 does not require elimination of election-day registration, and does not require moving the deadline for changes to an elector’s voter registration information.
[ ] YES on Legislative Referendum LR‐126
[ ] NO on Legislative Referendum LR‐126
The measure was introduced into the legislature by Sen. Alan Olson (R-23).
- Sen. Olson (R-23) argued, “The people of Montana do have the right to show up and vote, but with that vote comes responsibility.”
- Rep. Ted Washburn (R-69) stated, “We are looking at increasing the integrity of the vote because we are trying to get all the people registered on the last Friday before election. We are trying to concentrate on the large crowds that come out. Some times it takes four to six hours to try and get them registered and trying to get them into vote.”
The campaign in opposition of the measure is being led by Montanans for Fair and Free Elections.
- Montana AFL-CIO
- Montana Public Employees Association
- American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees
- Montana Education Association-Montana Federation of Teachers
- Montana Women Vote
- Western Native Voice
- Forward Montana
- Montana ACLU
- Northern Plains Resource Council
- Sleeping Giant Citizens Council
- Montana Organizing Project
- Carol's List
- YWCA of Great Falls
- Local 4993 - Department of Revenue
- Great Falls Child Development Federation
- Kalispell Education Association
- Great Falls Education Association
- Billings Education Association
- Planned Parenthood Advocates of Montana
- Montana Conservation Voters
- Executive Board of the University of Montana Faculty Association
State Representative Tom Woods (D-64) argued against LR-126, saying:
|“||The reason that proponents give for this is that same day registration results in a great deal of work for County Clerks on election day... but isn’t that what we pay our public employees for? Should we sacrifice the rights of thousands of Montanans simply because of an inconvenience to the clerks? I’m sorry, but that is just not sensible. If one night of overtime every other year is indeed the problem we can address it in other ways. We can add temporary staff at election time or we can simply accept later election returns. But this isn’t really the reason this issue is being pushed on us. Let’s examine some other reasoning...
It was stated on the floor of the legislature that same-day registration invites voter fraud. OK, if that is the case, how many voter fraud cases have we seen in Montana? Well, since the year 2006 (the year we implemented Election Day registration) we have seen two instances of fraud, one of which involved an absentee ballot. Let’s balance that against the number of people who (since 2006) were able to register and vote on election day: over 28,000. I think this clearly states that keeping same-day voter registration is the right thing to do. So again, why is this even an issue?...
The ballot initiative that I am talking about, LR–126 has been written and promoted by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). This is a national group that promotes its agenda by writing and introducing bills in each individual state legislature. This group has determined that it is to their advantage to end same-day voter registration. It’s partisan politics. It’s allowing an out-of-state group to tell us how to run our state. It’s wrong. 
—Rep. Tom Woods
Other arguments include:
- Gov. Bullock (D) said, "Anytime we’re making it more difficult for Montanans to vote, it’s a sad day in Montana. We should be doing everything we can to make sure that every Montanan can vote – not doing everything we can to prevent them from voting."
- Rep. Bryce Bennett (D-92) countered a Republican argument, stating, “Despite the fact that there may be a little bit more work for our county clerks when it comes to election day, we still have a right to vote. Despite the fact that there might be long lines sometimes, we still have a right to vote.”
- President of Montana Education Association-Montana Federation of Teachers (MEA-MFT), Eric Feaver, argued, "LR-126 is clear voter suppression, and it cuts across the board of affected groups – Native Americans, university students, people who have changed addresses and veterans."
- Montana Women Vote’s Sarah Howell contended, “Election Day registration is a safeguard that means if you find yourself unregistered on Election Day – whether by error, because you moved, or for any other reason – you are still able to register and vote at the same time. This is particularly important for seniors, veterans who have served out of state, people who live in rural Montana, low-income folks, and others.”
Media editorial positions
- Billings Gazette said, "Since Election Day registration became available in the 2006 elections, 28,329 Montanans have used it to exercise their right to vote, according to Secretary of State Linda McCulloch. When Montanans get their Nov. 4 ballots, they can ensure that those Election Day registrations continue for seniors, students, rural residents, city dwellers, newcomers, recently relocated residents – for all of us Montanans. Vote no on LR-126. Vote against repealing Election Day registration."
- Bozeman Daily Chronicle said, "If we change anything about the electoral process, we should do so with an eye toward making the act of voting easier and increasing the rate of participation. LR-126 would do just the opposite."
- See also: List of ballot measure lawsuits in 2014
MEA-MFT, et al. v. Fox
|2014 measure lawsuits|
| Alaska • Arkansas • California |
Illinois • Michigan • Missouri
Montana • Nebraska • New York
|By lawsuit type|
|Ballot text |
Motivation of sponsors
On December 3, 2013, the MEA-MFT, AFL-CIO, Montana Public Employees Association, Montana Human Rights Network, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Workers, Montana Women Vote and Western Native Voice filed a lawsuit with the Montana Supreme Court in an attempt to remove LR-126 from the ballot. The petitioners claimed LR-126’s title language to be false, as one line read, “ENSURING COMPLIANCE WITH THE NATIONAL VOTER REGISTRATION ACT [NVRA].” They noted, “Nothing in LR-126 is required in any way by the NVRA.” The “inaccurate language” was returned by the Attorney General to the Secretary of State without proper review, according to the petitioners. Therefore, the measure “is legally insufficient as a ballot measure.” The ACLU, League of Women Voters, AARP and the Montana Conservation Voters all filed amicus curiae briefs in support of the petitioners. The Attorney General, the respondent, stated, “Petitioners’ argument fails because LR-126 does contain language regarding the NVRA that is accurately summarized in the referendum’s title and addresses a concern raised by legislative staffers.”
On February 5, 2014, the Montana Supreme Court ruled in a 5-1 decision that LR-126 would stay on the ballot. Justice Michael Wheat was the lone dissenter. He said, "It is undeniable that same-day voter registration has absolutely nothing to do with compliance with the NVRA (National Voter Registration Act). Thus, the statement in the title of LR-126 to the contrary is a fatal defect that cannot be cured." Chief Justice Mike McGrath, writing for the majority, said, "[W]e are reluctant to take the extraordinary step of nullifying its placement on the ballot. [Supreme Court precedents] counsel in favor of allowing the measure to proceed to a vote." The court did, however, declare the contested sentence in the ballot statement to be incorrect and ordered it to be rewritten. The original statement said that the referendum's approval was necessary to ensure compliance with a federal law, the National Voter Registration Act. According to the court, LR-126's intent is not required by the NVRA.
Path to the ballot
A simple majority was required in both chambers of the legislature to place the legislatively-referred state statute on the ballot in Montana. SB 405 was approved through a vote in both legislative chambers. It was approved by the Montana House of Representatives on April 17, 2013. The measure was approved by the Montana State Senate on April 19, 2013.
April 17, 2013 House vote
|Montana SB 405 House Vote|
April 19, 2013 Senate vote
|Montana SB 405 Senate Vote|
- Montana Secretary of State, "Legislative Referendum No. 126 Ballot Language," accessed on January 17, 2014
- Montana Legislature, "SB 405 - Detailed Bill Information," accessed January 17, 2014
- Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.
- KRTV, "Same-day voter registration debated in Montana Legislature," April 17, 2013
- Montana Public Media, "Legislators refer big changes in elections to Montana voters," April 21, 2013
- Montanans for Fair and Free Elections, "Homepage," accessed September 18, 2014
- Belgrade News, "Oppose LR-126," February 14, 2014
- Char-Koosta News, "Montana Indians have to help defeat LR 126," September 25, 2014
- Missoulian, "Groups ask Montana court to strike referendums from ballot," December 19, 2013
- Montanans for Free and Fair Elections, "Endorsements," accessed September 18, 2014
- Montana Public Radio, "Election Protection," January 17, 2014
- Billings Gazette, "Gazette opinion: The voting rights threat on November ballots," September 14, 2014
- Bozeman Daily Chronicle, "Editorial: Voting should be easier, not more difficult," September 29, 2014
- Office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, “Petition Challenging the Legal Sufficiency of LR-126”, accessed January 27, 2014
- Office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, "Public View Docket," accessed January 27, 2014
- Office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, "Response/Objection - Petition for Write (Attorney General)," accessed January 27, 2014
- Missoulian, "Montana Supreme Court OKs voter registration referendum," February 5, 2014
- Helena Independent Reporter, "Referendum to end Election Day voter registration stays on ballot," February 6, 2014
State of Montana
List of Montana ballot measures | Local measures | School bond issues | Ballot measure laws | Initiative laws | History of I&R | History of direct democracy | Campaign Finance Requirements | Recall process |
|State executive officers||
Governor | Lieutenant Governor | Attorney General | Secretary of State | Director of the Department of Revenue | State Auditor | Superintendent of Public Instruction | Commissioner of Securities and Insurance | Director of Agriculture | Director of Natural Resources and Conservation | Commissioner of Labor and Industry | Public Service Commission |