Montana State Auditor, C-43 (2006)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Voting on
State Executive
Ballot Measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot
Montana Constitution
Flag of Montana.png

The Montana State Auditor Amendment, also known as C-43, was on the November 7, 2006 ballot in Montana as a legislatively-referred constitutional amendment, where it was defeated. The measure would have changed the name of the state auditor to the insurance commissioner.[1][2]

Election results

Montana C-43 (2006)
Defeatedd No237,36764.05%
Yes 133,219 35.95%

Election results via: Montana Secretary of State

Text of measure

The text of the measure can be read here.


The proposed amendment was supported by Senator Duane Grimes and Representative Dave Gallik. They argued that the Montana State Auditor does not audit "in the traditional sense," and therefore "state auditor" is a confusing term that causes misunderstandings and delays for consumers. They also stated that many states use the term "insurance commissioner" because it best describes the main function of the office--the regulation of the insurance industry--and argued that the name change would "simplify Montanans' lives and make state government more straightforward and understandable."[3]


The measure was opposed by Representative Wayne Stahl. He argued that the state constitution should not be amended frivolously, and claimed that the proposed amendment "only applies a band aid to a real problem in state government and does not fit the duties of the office to the title of the office." He stated that,

"Currently the Auditor's Office regulates insurance companies and securities companies. Many insurance companies' business operations include banking. Many banks also deal in insurance. However, the banking industry in Montana is regulated by the Department of Administration. Insurance, banking, and securities industries should all be regulated by one agency. The legislature should consolidate those regulatory duties and then ask the people of Montana to change the name of the office."

He also suggested eliminating the State Auditor's Office and transferring its duties to another department as an alternative, and argued that changing the name of the office would be expensive due to the cost of changing web sites, computer programs, public notifications and general supplies.[3]

See also

Suggest a link

External links


BallotMeasureFinal badge.png
This historical ballot measure article requires that the text of the measure be added to the page.