Oklahoma Rainy Day Fund, State Question 725 (2006)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Voting on
state and local
government budgets,
spending and finance
State finance.jpg
Policy
Budget policy
Ballot measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot
Oklahoma Constitution
675px-Flag of Oklahoma.svg.png
Articles
PreambleIIIIIIIVVVIVIIVIIAVIIBVIIIIXXXIXIIXIIAXIIIXIIIAXIIIBXIVXVXVIXVIIXVIIIXIXXXXXIXXIIXXIIIXXIVXXVXXVIXXVIIIXXIXSchedule

The Oklahoma Rainy Day Fund Amendment, also known as State Question 725, was on the November 7, 2006 ballot in Oklahoma as a legislatively-referred constitutional amendment, where it was approved. The measure allowed up to $10 million to be spent from the Rainy Day Fund per year to induce people to make investments in businesses within the state.[1]

Election results

Oklahoma State Question 725 (2006)
ResultVotesPercentage
Approveda Yes 464,664 53.58%
No402,57746.42%

Election results via: Oklahoma Secretary of State

Text of measure

The text of the measure can be read here.

Background

State Ballot Question 725 was a proposed constitutional amendment that made up to $10 million available annually from the state’s Constitutional Reserve Fund (Rainy Day Fund) for incentive payments to help at-risk manufacturing companies that may be forced to close or move elsewhere. Payments would be made to eligible companies fulfilling various specified requirements for up to 10% of the capital costs of new retooling or modernization projects, subject to approval by the Governor, House Speaker and Senate President Pro Tem. Payments could only be made in years when the Rainy Day Fund has a balance in excess of $80 million and when state revenues for the upcoming year were projected to grow.[2]

Support

Supporters of the measure stated:[3]

The Quality Investment Program is a critical and appropriate mechanism that would help Oklahoma retain existing manufacturers that have a vital economic impact on communities and employees.

The potential loss of jobs, tax dollars and general economic activity to a local community and the state that can result from a plant closing represents an “emergency” and thus falls under the provision for use of the Rainy Day Fund. his program is subject to formal and rigorous guidelines and oversight. HB 1619 identifies clear criteria by which to evaluate whether incentive payments can be expected to be economically efficient.

The requirement of a formal investment contract guarantees that companies that receive incentive payments will invest in capital assets over a five-year period and makes payments contingent on the company’s actual investments. [4]

Opposition

Opponents of the measure stated:[5]

These kind of financial subsidies are a distortion of free market principles and amount to corporate welfare. The government should not be in the business of assisting private firms.

The Rainy Day Fund is intended to address budgetary emergencies. Dipping into the Rainy Day Fund to fund economic development programs leaves the state more vulnerable to budget downturns and creates a bad precedent that opens the door to further raids on the state’s reserves.

Because operation of the program is tied to the fluctuating balance of the Rainy Day Fund and annual revenue projections, manufacturers may find themselves ineligible for payments for one or more years, which may create uncertainty for investors. [4]

Campaign finance

Donors to the campaign for the measure:[6]

  • Yes On 725: $14,750
  • Total: $14,750

See also

BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Suggest a link

External links

References

  1. Oklahoma Secretary of State, "State Questions," accessed December 2, 2014
  2. Oklahoma Women’s Network Blog
  3. Issue Brief (dead link)
  4. 4.0 4.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.
  5. Issue Brief (dead link)
  6. Follow the Money, "Donors"

BallotMeasureFinal badge.png
This historical ballot measure article requires that the text of the measure be added to the page.