Oklahoma Rainy Day Fund Amendment, State Question 757 (2010)
- See also: 2010 ballot measure election results
Official results of the measure follow:
|Question 757 (Rainy Day Fund)|
Results via the Oklahoma Election Board.
Text of measure
| This measure amends the State Constitution. It amends Section 23 of Article 10. It increases the amount of surplus revenue which goes into a special fund. That fund is the Constitutional Reserve Fund. The amount would go from 10% to 15% of the funds certified as going to the General Revenue fund for the preceding fiscal year.
Shall the proposal be approved?
For the proposal
Against the proposal
The summary of the measure read:
- A Joint Resolution directing the Secretary of State to refer to the people for their approval or rejection a proposed amendment to Section 23 of Article X of the Oklahoma Constitution; modifying the maximum percentage of surplus funds to be placed in the Constitutional Reserve Fund; deleting obsolete language; providing ballot title; and directing filing.
The state constitution mandated that 10 percent of the state's excess revenues must be placed in a rainy day fund. Oklahomans first approved a Rainy Day Fund in 1985 via a referendum. Due to the economic downturn, some elected officials have pressed for passage of SQ 757.
State Treasurer Scott Meacham felt that the state needed more money in reserve to deal with an economic emergency. Mecham further argued that a bigger rainy day fund was needed due volatility in the gas and oil markets that effect state revenues. Oklahoma's economy was heavily dependent on the gas and oil industries..
As of September 26, 2010, the State of Oklahoma had $10 in its rainy day fund. The state began the year with $596 million in the rainy day fund. Virtually all of the fund was depleted in order to fix a shortfall in the 2010 state budget .
State Representative Mike Reynolds opposed a bigger rainy day fund and called it savings accounts for lawmakers. Reynolds said that the state should have returned any excess revenues to the taxpayers. The state representative warned that there was not much of a rainy day fund for the 2010 fiscal year and worried that voters may be deceived by the amendment's passage..
- Governor of Oklahoma Brad Henry supported the measure, stating, "I don't think you can ever go wrong by adding more money to your savings account and conserving resources for times of emergency. If we have learned anything from the latest downturn, it is that Oklahoma's current Rainy Day Fund isn't large enough to fully protect us from every economic storm.”
- Mike Reynolds voted against sending the measure to the ballot, stating, "We're not going to have any Rainy Day funds this year; it was just a feel-good thing for the leadership to pass." Reynolds later stated that surplus money should be returned to taxpayers. Reynolds stated, "They'd like to have it in their own savings account. Instead, what this will do is allow the state to keep more of the taxpayers' dollars for expenses in future years."
- The Oklahoman recommended a 'yes' vote on the measure, stating, "The measure would increase from 10 percent to 15 percent the amount of surplus revenue that can go in the state's savings account. This is a responsible measure that will help Oklahoma weather future budget storms."
- The Enid News and Eagle recommended a 'yes' vote on the measure, stating, "The Rainy Day Fund is a good way to stave off disaster when the economy and state revenues fall short in any given year or period of time."
- The Tulsa World was for the measure, recommending a 'yes' vote: "SQ 757 is the only good proposal on the state ballot. It would increase the limit on the state Constitution’s “rainy day” fund from 10 percent of the amount of the previous year’s certified general revenue fund to 15 percent. That would provide the state with a larger savings account for dealing with bad budget years and restrict the amount the state budget can expand during good years. The measure, which was first proposed by Gov. Brad Henry, is prudent and should be approved."
- The Oklahoma Daily was for the measure, stating, "Money from the state’s surplus revenue is put in the Constitutional Reserve Fund, more commonly known as the Rainy Day Fund. The measure would help cushion the impact of budget crises, such as the one Oklahoma is in right now. It’s a common sense measure everyone should support."
- The Tulsa Beacon made recommendations for all the state questions on the ballot, and recommended a 'yes' vote on the measure.
- See also: Polls, 2010 ballot measures
- In a poll conducted by SoonerPoll.com, 57 percent of voters polled stated that they were for the measure. The poll surveyed likely registered voters in the state, which included 385 Democrats, 340 Republicans and 31 independents. The margin of error was reported to be 3.57 percentage points and was commissioned by the Tulsa World.
- In one of the last polls taken by SoonerPoll before the general election, the results showed support of the measure by those surveyed. The poll included 384 Democrats, 345 Republicans and 24 independents.
|Date of Poll||Pollster||In favor||Opposed||Undecided||Number polled|
|July 16-21, 2010||SoonerPoll.com||57%||33%||10%||755|
|October 18-23, 2010||SoonerPoll.com||57%||29%||14%||753|
Path to the ballot
The measure was approved by the Oklahoma House of Representatives with a vote of 91-8 on May 28, 2010, sending the resolution to the ballot in the fall. The Oklahoma State Legislature can approve a proposed amendment by a majority vote. (However, if the state legislature wants the proposed amendment to go on a special election ballot, it has to approve the amendment by a 2/3rds vote.)
- Oklahoma State Questions Booklet for the November 2, 2010 election, prepared by the Oklahoma State Election Board
- ↑ Tulsa World, "Oklahoma House brings session to an end", May 28, 2010
- ↑ Oklahoma Secretary of State, "Proposed State Questions", Retrieved on August 23, 2010
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Oklahoma Legislature, "SJR 51"
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 News OK "November election: Ballot issue would raise Rainy Day Fund caps", September 26, 2010
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 The Oklahoman, "November election: Ballot issue would raise Rainy Day Fund cap", September 26, 2010
- ↑ The Oklahoman, "Our SQ choices", October 17, 2010
- ↑ The Enid News and Eagle, "Our take on the state questions", October 18, 2010
- ↑ Tulsa World, "State questions", October 24, 2010
- ↑ The Oklahoma Daily, "OUR VIEW: State Questions 757", October 28, 2010
- ↑ Tulsa Beacon, "Tulsa Beacon voting endorsements for the Nov. 2 Election", October 28, 2010
- ↑ The Tulsa World, "Education funding measure supported, Oklahoma Poll shows", August 5, 2010
- ↑ Tulsa World, "SQ 744 opposition rises", October 30, 2010
State of Oklahoma
Oklahoma City (capital)
|State executive officers||
Governor | Lieutenant Governor | Attorney General | Secretary of State | Treasurer | State Auditor and Inspector | Superintendent of Public Instruction | Commissioner of Insurance | Commissioner of Agriculture | Director of Wildlife Conservation | Commissioner of Labor | Commissioner of Corporations |