Oregon Petition Legislature to Review Administrative Rules, Measure 2 (2000)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Voting on
State Legislature
State legislatures measures.jpg
Ballot Measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot
Oregon Constitution
Flag of Oregon.png
Articles
PreambleIIIIIIIVVVIVIIVIIIIXXX-AXIXI-AXI-BXI-CXI-DXI-EXI-F(1)XI-F(2)XI-GXI-HXI-I(1)XI-I(2)XI-JXI-KXI-LXI-MXI-NXI-OXI-PXIIXIIIXIVXVXVIXVIIXVIII

The Oregon Petition Legislature to Review Administrative Rules Amendment, also known as Measure 2, was on the November 7, 2000 ballot in Oregon as an initiated state statute, where it was defeated. The measure created a process for petitioning the legislature to review administrative rules.[1]

Election results

Oregon Measure 2 (2000)
ResultVotesPercentage
Defeatedd No779,19056.27%
Yes 605,575 43.73%

Election results via: Oregon Blue Book

Ballot title

Amends Constitution: Creates Process For Requiring Legislature To Review Administrative Rules[2]

Proponents

Larry George, David Hunnicutt, and Jason Williams

Support

[3] Supporters of the measure don't approve of voters being locked out of the process of the state legislature. They argued that if citizens may propose changes to state statutes or the constitution through the initiative process, then they should be able to do the same with the administrative rules.

Chief petitioner Larry George of Citizens for Accountability in Administrative Rules urged people to vote yes on the measure, stating:

"Measure 2 creates an open, fair process that allows the citizens to require the legislature to review and vote on administrative rules. Measure 2 is fair, open, and citizen driven. The special interests will hate it, but Oregonians should demand it."

Some supporters pointed out how the administrative rules contradict certain laws in Oregon. Dennis R. Tuuri of the Parents Education Association wanted voters to be aware of these contradictions: "Go to the Oregon Revised Statutes (Section 657.072) and you'll find the law says nonprofit organizations don't have to pay unemployment taxes. But go to the Administrative Rules of this section, and you'll find that these groups DO have to pay unemployment taxes! Observe the law and you're in violation of the rules, which have the force of law!"

The Oregon Education Coalition argued that Oregon needs a fair process by which citizens can get the legislature to review administrative rules that aren't productive, saying, "What most people don't know is that a major obstacle to improving our schools is the Byzantine maze of administrative rules written by un-elected bureaucrats. These rules have tied the hands of Oregon's school administrators and Oregon's thousands of talented and competent classroom teachers. These rules have the force of law, yet were never voted upon by the legislature."

Opposition

[4] Some opposition, such as the League of Women Voters, considered the measure to be unecessary clutter in the Oregon Constitution, also citing the measure as "dangerous" because it would only require 10,000 signatures to petition the legislature for a review of the administrative rules. They also maintained that "Administrative rules are written to prevent agencies from arbitrarily or capriciously interpreting statute." and that "Current law provides both legislative and legal remedies to citizens believing an agency has exceeded its authority."

The ACLU of Oregon defended the current open process of rule making with public hearings in Oregon, where citizens work with public agencies to come up with "responsible" rules. They argued that Measure 2 would allow rules created in an open process to be nullified behind closed doors. They also defended the separation of powers within the government and said the measure wrongly gave the legislature the power to override executive branch decisions without requiring a vote of both houses of the legislature.

Most opposition agreed that the measure was unecessary, as there were already ways to review rules and plenty of "checks and balances" to the administrative process. They also argued that the measure could mean hundreds of rules that protect the public and the environment are repealed without any kind of vote from citizens or the Legislature. Many environmental groups and businesses urged voters to defeat the measure.

Some others who opposed the measure are:

  • Governor (in 2000) John Kitzhaber, M.D.
  • Oregon Environmental Council
  • Oregon Community Protection PAC
  • Oregon Shores Conservation Coalition
  • Oregon Parks Association

See also

BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Suggest a link

External links

References


BallotMeasureFinal badge.png
This historical ballot measure article requires that the text of the measure be added to the page.