For status updates, visit lucyburns.org.
Ballotpedia's coverage of elections held on March 3, 2015, was limited. Select races were covered live, and all results will be added once the merger is complete.
Oregon Sentencing Reform Initiative (2010)
|Not on Ballot|
| This measure did not or |
will not appear on a ballot
Text of measure
Increases incarceration for some felons; expands consecutive sentencing authority; courts may require appropriate drug treatment.
Result of "Yes" Vote: "Yes" vote increases incarceration for some felons; gives courts additional broad discretion to impose consecutive sentences; allows courts to require appropriate drug treatment in 2011.
Result of "No" Vote: "No" vote retains current law regarding felony incarceration allowing consecutive sentences in defined circumstances; requiring Department of Corrections to provide appropriate drug treatment in 2012.
According to the description prepared by the Oregon Secretary of State:
Current law allows early release of some inmates who have served at least 70 percent of their felony sentences; does not allow reduction of mandatory minimum sentences; requires drug treatment for certain offenders beginning in 2012. Current law presumes that criminal sentences will be served concurrently and allows consecutive sentences only upon specified factual findings by sentencing court. Measure requires all inmates to serve at least 80 percent of original term of incarceration imposed by sentencing court; retains requirement that mandatory minimum sentences may not be reduced. Measure allows courts to require appropriate drug treatment for specified individuals beginning in 2011. Measure presumes that criminal sentences will be served consecutively, but gives trial court additional broad discretion to impose concurrent or consecutive sentences. Other provisions.
Path to the ballot
- See also: Oregon signature requirements
According to the secretary of state, supporters did not file signatures in an attempt to qualify the measure for the 2010 ballot. Initiative petitions for statutes required six percent of 1,379,475, or 82,769 signatures. The deadline for filing signatures for the November 2, 2010 ballot was July 2, 2010. According to reports, initiative supporters have already filed 1,210 signatures as of March 31. May 2010 reports indicated that a total of 5,048 signatures had been collected.
- Supreme Court decision: Steven C. Berman v. John Kroger (Oregon Attorney General), January 19, 2010
- Full text of proposed initiative, as filed
- Oregon Secretary of State, "Initiative 56 - Oregon Sentencing Reform Initiative," accessed February 5, 2010
- Oregon Secretary of State, "Amended ballot title," January 22, 2010
- Oregon Secretary of State, "Initiative 53 amended ballot title," February 16, 2010
- The Oregonian, "So far, three Oregon initiatives look likely to qualify for ballot," April 15, 2010
- The Oregonian, "Oregon initiative petitioning gearing up, but few may make ballot," May 17, 2010
State of Oregon
List of Oregon ballot measures | Local measures | School bond issues | Ballot measure laws | Initiative laws | History of I&R | History of direct democracy | Campaign Finance Requirements | Recall process |
|State executive officers||
Governor | Lieutenant Governor | Attorney General | Secretary of State | Treasurer | Auditor | Superintendent of Public Instruction | Administrator of Insurance | Director of Agriculture | Director of Fish and Wildlife | Commissioner of Labor and Industries | Commissioner of Public Utilities |