For status updates, visit lucyburns.org.
Ballotpedia's coverage of elections held on March 3, 2015, was limited. Select races were covered live, and all results will be added once the merger is complete.
Oregon State Lottery Amendment, Measure 62 (2008)
|Voting on Gambling|
|Not on ballot|
- 1 Election results
- 2 Text of measure
- 3 Background
- 4 Specific provisions
- 5 Support
- 6 Opposition
- 7 Newspaper endorsements
- 8 See also
- 9 External links
- 10 References
Measure 62 was an initiated constitutional amendment that dealt with the issue of where a percentage of profit from the state lottery should go. The initiative, if it had passed, would have required that 15% of net lottery proceeds be deposited in a public safety fund. 50% of that fund would have been distributed to counties to fund grants for childhood programs, district attorney operations, and sheriff's investigations. The other 50% of the fund would have gone to Oregon State Police criminal investigations and forensic operations. It is expected that most of that money would have been diverted from schools.
- Election results from Oregon Secretary of State
Text of measure
The official ballot title was:
Allocates 15% Of Lottery Proceeds To Public Safety Fund For Crime Prevention, Investigation, Prosecution
The full text of constitutional changes proposed by Measure 62 is available here.
|historical ballot measure article requires that the text of the measure be added to the page.|
Measure 62 had become unofficially known as the Oregon C.S.I. Measure.
Where the money would have gone:
- 20% for grants to counties to fund early childhood programs for children who are at risk;
- 50% to fund the criminal investigation and forensics operations (including crime lab) of the Oregon State Police to assist law enforcement throughout the state;
- 15% to provide grants to countries to supplement existing county appropriations for the operations of District Attorneys;
- 15% to provide grants to counties to supplement existing county appropriations for investigation and field operations of county sheriffs.
Estimated fiscal impact
The state's Financial Estimate Committee prepares estimated fiscal impact statements for any ballot measures that will appear on the ballot. The estimate prepared by this committee for Measure 62 said:
- Measure 62 would require public safety spending from the state lottery fund of $100 million in the first year, increasing in subsequent years depending on how much money goes into the state lottery fund from the sales of tickets in the Oregon state-sponsored lottery.
Arguments in favor
Notable arguments made in favor of Measure 62 included:
- More money going into crime investigations will help reduce the backlog of investigations.
- Currently, some crimes in Oregon aren't investigated using modern forensic techniques because the resources don't exist.
- Rural counties especially need the help funding investigations.
- The money is needed to help stabilize funding for state police investigations.
Defend Oregon opposed Measure 62.
Notable arguments made against Measure 62 include:
- It would divert money from the lottery that would otherwise go to schools.
- From the Oregonian's No on 62 endorsement: "Ballot Measure 62 is one more in a long line of gratuitous assaults on good government in Oregon. Ill-conceived and poorly crafted, the measure would rip millions of lottery dollars from where they are most needed -- Oregon classrooms -- and squander them in a hodgepodge of public safety causes."
Defend Oregon, as a committee, fought seven different ballot measures, and supported two others. As a result, it was not possible to discern how much of its campaign money was going specifically to defeat Measure 61. Altogether, the group raised over $6 million in 2008.
Major donations to the Defend Oregon group as of October 8 included:
- $4.1 million from the Oregon Education Association.
- $100,000 from School Employees Exercising Democracy (SEED)
- $100,000 from the AFL-CIO.
- $50,000 from Oregon AFSCME Council 75.
Below is a chart showing the position of the editorial boards of Oregon's major newspapers on Measure 62.
- See also: Endorsements of Oregon ballot measures.
|Corvallis Gazette Times||No|
|Coos Bay The World||No|
|Yamhill Valley News Register||No|
- List of Oregon ballot measures
- Oregon 2008 ballot measures
- 2008 ballot measures
- Chief Petitioner Kevin Mannix
- Oregon Voters' Pamphlet for Measure 62
- 2008 Election Results
- 2008 General Election Measures: Voter Guide
- Information and status on this initiative from the Secretary of State
- Official text of measure
- Explanatory statement
- Website for the Defend Oregon Coalition
- Initiative summary
- OregonLive.com: "Two more initiatives qualify for Ore. ballot," The Oregonian, July 21, 2008
- Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.
- Oregon Public Broadcasting, "Ballot Measure 62: 'The Oregon: C.S.I. Measure'," September 29, 2008
- Estimated fiscal impact statement for Oregon Measure 62
- Register Guard, "Digging deeper into state ballot measures," August 7, 2008
- Oregon Public Broadcasting, "Measure 62: Lottery Funds," September 8, 2008 (dead link)
- Basic Rights Oregon, "This Election Season Make Sure to Vote No on Measures 59, 62 and 64!" (dead link)
- Campaign finance history of Defend Oregon for 2008
- Record of donations to Defend Oregon
- Oregon Live, "Teachers, nurses add $2.5 million to campaigns," September 10, 2008
- The Oregonian, "OEA puts $4 million into ballot measure fight," October 8, 2008
- Oregonian, "School workers add $100,000 to campaign," August 25, 2008
State of Oregon
List of Oregon ballot measures | Local measures | School bond issues | Ballot measure laws | Initiative laws | History of I&R | History of direct democracy | Campaign Finance Requirements | Recall process |
|State executive officers||
Governor | Lieutenant Governor | Attorney General | Secretary of State | Treasurer | Auditor | Superintendent of Public Instruction | Administrator of Insurance | Director of Agriculture | Director of Fish and Wildlife | Commissioner of Labor and Industries | Commissioner of Public Utilities |