Personhood supporters file suit against Colorado's Blue Book

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

September 22, 2010

Abortion on the ballot in 2010
Nevada 2010 ballot measuresUtah 2010 ballot measuresColorado Fetal Personhood, Amendment 62 (2010)New Mexico 2010 ballot measuresArizona 2010 ballot measuresMontana 2010 ballot measuresCalifornia 2010 ballot measuresOregon 2010 ballot measuresWashington 2010 ballot measuresIdaho 2010 ballot measuresOklahoma 2010 ballot measuresKansas 2010 ballot measuresNebraska 2010 ballot measuresSouth Dakota 2010 ballot measuresNorth Dakota 2010 ballot measuresIowa 2010 ballot measuresMissouri 2010 ballot measuresArkansas 2010 ballot measuresLouisiana 2010 ballot measuresAlabama 2010 ballot measuresGeorgia 2010 ballot measuresFlorida 2010 ballot measuresSouth Carolina 2010 ballot measuresIllinois 2010 ballot measuresTennessee 2010 ballot measuresNorth Carolina 2010 ballot measuresIndiana 2010 ballot measuresOhio 2010 ballot measuresMaine 2010 ballot measuresVirginia 2010 ballot measuresMaryland 2010 ballot measuresMaryland 2010 ballot measuresRhode Island 2010 ballot measuresRhode Island 2010 ballot measuresMassachusetts 2010 ballot measuresMichigan 2010 ballot measuresMichigan 2010 ballot measuresAlaska Parental Notification Initiative, Ballot Measure 2 (2010)Hawaii 2010 ballot measuresCertified Abortion, 2010 Map.png

DENVER, Colorado: Colorado Fetal Personhood, Amendment 62 supporters filed a lawsuit on September 21 against the Colorado Legislative Council to stop distribution of the 2010 State Voter Guide, also known as The Blue Book. Supporters argue that the Blue Book misleads voters and misstates facts about the measure. According to reports, the voter guide was available online for several days prior to the lawsuit and an estimated 1.8 million copies have been sent to voters in the state.[1]

Amendment 62, if approved by voters, would apply the "term 'person' as used in the Colorado Constitution in [relation] to inalienable rights, equality of justice and due process of law, to every human being from the beginning of the biological development of that human being."

The legislative council met on September 1 to discuss and approve the final wording for the pamphlet but according to supporters, they did not see the wording until September 20.[1][2]

Specifically supporters complained that none of the submitted supporting arguments were used in the guide and several erroneous statements were made. Some of the falsehoods that supporters point to, include: statements from opponents that women would be denied health care for certain emergency procedures including miscarriages; statements that doctors and nurses could be subject to legal action; and the statement that the "beginning of the biological development" is "not an accepted medical or scientific term."[3]

The lawsuit alleges that the Legislative Council was bias. "This has the result that the ballot information booklet is, in effect, one big argument against Amendment 62," states the lawsuit.[3] According to reports, there have been only five challenges to the Blue Book since 1996 and all cases were dismissed.[1]

The 2010 Blue Book can be found here.

See also

Ballotpedia News