Racine Unified School District employee salaries

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Racine Unified School District employee salaries apply to employees of the public school district Racine Unified School District.

According to 2008 U.S. Census data, the state of Wisconsin and local governments in the state employed a total of 379,539 people.[1] Of those employees, 240,747 were full-time employees receiving net pay of $998,312,248 per month and 138,792 were part-time employees paid $123,619,591 per month.[1] More than 57% of those employees, or 218,585 employees, were in education or higher education.[1]

Salaries

Below are the administrative staff members and their 2010 pay:[2]

Name Position title Prorated salary Prorated fringe
Scott Stralka Assistant Principal $75,106.00 $41,032.00
Stephanie Phernetton Principal $95,814.00 $46,575.00
James Linstroth Assistant Principal $23,305.80 $4,531.80
Rebecca Zahn Assistant Principal $73,997.00 $14,195.00
Kenneth Black Assistant Principal $75,106.00 $6,504.00
Douglas Clum Principal $81,513.00 $42,345.00
James Hass Principal $79,525.00 $6,886.00
Anne Swanson Principal $77,767.00 $41,522.00
Jamie Syvrud Assistant Principal $70,913.00 $39,284.00
Steven Russo Principal $88,569.00 $25,074.00
Issac Kirkwood Assistant Principal $69,866.00 $38,348.00
Kevin Brown Principal $83,451.00 $43,303.00
Kathryn Poznanski Assistant Principal $70,913.00 $27,117.00
Culleen Witthuhn Assistant Principal $24,544.00 $14,701.20
Billie Novick Principal $81,513.00 $43,899.00
Angela Apmann Principal $95,814.00 $26,782.00
John Strack Assistant Principal $76,233.00 $41,391.00
John Brooke Assistant Principal $79,906.00 $17,619.00
James Linstroth Assistant Principal $23,305.80 $4,531.80
Erica Bates Assistant Principal $73,997.00 $40,769.00
Deborah Coca Principal $81,513.00 $43,795.00
Soren Gajewski Principal $77,767.00 $16,587.00
Cecilia Holley Principal $79,525.00 $41,608.00
James Beaulieu Assistant Principal $71,977.00 $40,213.00
Cheri Kulland Principal $88,569.00 $44,250.00
Sherrie Hopkins Assistant Principal $74,709.00 $40,545.00
Kim De Lao Principal $75,486.00 $41,355.00
Sharon Campbell Principal $81,513.00 $30,777.00
Lori Patino Assistant Principal $25,477.20 $15,241.20
Staci Kimmons Principal $75,486.00 $28,967.00
Gayle Titus Principal $79,525.00 $42,601.00
Richard Larson Assistant Principal $81,000.00 $15,547.00
Ann Yehle Principal $90,783.00 $32,624.00
Rosalie Daca Assistant Principal $74,709.00 $40,982.00
Kevin Mccormick Principal $75,486.00 $40,528.00
Eugene Syvrud Assistant Principal $69,866.00 $13,316.00
Robert Wilhelmi Principal $88,569.00 $19,130.00
Leslie Jensen Assistant Principal $71,977.00 $39,594.00
Mark Zanin Principal $77,767.00 $40,288.00
Kathleen Jackson Principal $81,513.00 $43,299.00
Andrea Rittgers Assistant Principal $73,997.00 $40,108.00
Daniel Thielen Principal $97,490.00 $35,504.00
Keith Mosley Assistant Principal $79,906.00 $42,562.00
James Linstroth Assistant Principal $19,976.40 $3,884.40
Daniel Bieser Assistant Principal $75,106.00 $28,328.00
Dona Sens Assistant District Administrator $109,601.00 $38,175.00
Chad Chapin Assistant Director of Special Education $70,913.00 $31,622.00
James Shaw District Administrator $180,000.00 $34,193.00
Kathleen Strasser Assistant Director of Special Education $74,709.00 $44,616.00
Steven Hejnal Central Office Administrator $104,902.00 $48,639.00
David Hazen Business Manager $121,653.00 $22,721.00
Christine Christensen Assistant Director of Special Education $74,709.00 $45,085.00
Jeffrey Weiss Director of Instruction/Program Supervisor $99,196.00 $47,476.00
Bradley Haag Director of Instruction/Program Supervisor $77,956.00 $45,481.00
Brian Colbert Assistant District Administrator $105,345.00 $53,603.00
Gayle Richter Director of Instruction/Program Supervisor $52,767.00 $10,481.00
Anna Laing Director of Special Education and/or Pupil Services $104,400.00 $14,051.00
Jeffrey Blaga Director of Instruction/Program Supervisor $79,906.00 $11,209.00
Marie Craig Director of Special Education and/or Pupil Services $86,397.00 $48,260.00
Jose Martinez Director of Instruction/Program Supervisor $62,400.00 $27,420.00
Clara Grays Director of Instruction/Program Supervisor $77,956.00 $42,827.00
Bethel Cager Assistant District Administrator $112,630.00 $54,354.00
John Esser Director of Instruction/Program Supervisor $75,106.00 $41,148.00
Richard Fornal Director of Instruction/Program Supervisor $82,118.00 $6,984.00
Charles Leonard Director of Instruction/Program Supervisor $79,907.00 $38,242.00
Culleen Witthuhn Assistant Principal $36,816.00 $22,051.80
Leslie Hunt Principal $81,513.00 $42,937.00
Jeffrey Rasmussen Principal $81,513.00 $43,795.00
Shelley Geiselman Principal $79,525.00 $30,458.00
Sandra Brand Principal $90,783.00 $33,602.00
Jacquelin Brownell Assistant Principal $73,057.00 $40,602.00
Enrico Perkins Assistant Principal $76,577.00 $14,879.00
William Levin District Instructional Technology Coordinator $79,906.00 $29,740.00
Robert Holzem Principal $52,116.50 $18,443.00
Lori Patino Assistant Principal $38,215.80 $22,861.80
Ursula Hamilton Principal $84,911.00 $43,651.00
Robert Holzem Principal $26,058.25 $9,221.50
Robert Holzem Principal $26,058.25 $9,221.50
Christopher Thompson Principal $75,486.00 $41,152.00
Irene Nahabedian Principal $81,513.00 $30,667.00

Salary records project

In 2011, Sunshine Review chose 152 local governments as the focus of research on public employee salaries. The editors of Sunshine Review selected eight states with relevant political contexts (listed alphabetically):

1. California
2. Florida
3. Illinois
4. Michigan
5. New Jersey
6. Pennsylvania
7. Texas
8. Wisconsin

Within these states, the editors of Sunshine Review focused on the most populous cities, counties and school districts, as well as the emergency services entities within these governments. The purpose of this selection method was to develop articles on governments affecting the most citizens.

The salary information garnered from these states were a combination of existing online resources and state Freedom of Information Act requests sent out to the governments.

Importance of public employee pay disclosure

In July 2010, The Los Angeles Times uncovered that officials in Bell, California were making remarkably high salaries.[3] Chief Administrative Officer Robert Rizzo was earning a yearly $787,637. It was later uncovered that Rizzo's total compensation after taking benefits into account topped $1.5 million a year.[4]

For comparison:[3]

  • Manhattan Beach, with about 7,000 fewer people than Bell, paid its most recent city manager $257,484 a year.
  • Long Beach, with a population close to 500,000, paid its city manager $235,000 annually.
  • Los Angeles County paid its chief executive, William T. Fujioka, $338,458.

Corruption solution

After this report was released, governments began to proactively disclose salary information of their employees. Before the end of the summer of 2010, more than a dozen cities in Orange County, for example, posted salary information on the front pages of their websites.[5]

The cost of transparency websites maintaining such information ranges from the tens of thousands to the hundreds of thousands. These websites also save money, and this often is not taken into account when measuring costs.

Citizens upset about the breach of trust and armed with information formed a group called the Bell Association to Stop the Abuse, which pushed for an independent audit of city salaries and contracts.[6]

Citizens, empowered with information, are key to keeping government free from corruption and efficient. A study published by the Pew Charitable Trusts and the Economy League of Greater Philadelphia revealed that the city of Philadelphia has a problem with the efficiency and costs of public employee pensions.[7] The amount that Philadelphia pays to pension recipients limits the city’s ability to use its budget effectively.

The report revealed that there were more individuals receiving pension benefits—33,907 claimants in 2006—than workers in the city—28,701.[7] The authors of the study recommend three steps towards addressing the problem of high costs in pensions.[7] First, improve data collection so that decision-making in terms of pension policies is more informed. Second, promote transparency for better accountability to citizens. Third, reduce costs and use the savings for developing Philadelphia.

Resistance to public employee salary data as public records

The idea of making public employee salaries is relatively new. In 2008, several local government employee associations and unions protested the posting of state employee salaries by newspaper The Sacramento Bee.[8][9] At the time, it was seen as a safety risk and invasion of privacy.

Sunshine Review aims in posting salary information

Publicly posted salaries often leave out important information. Salary schedules can be published as ranges, not as specific take-home compensation, and high-level, highly-paid positions are often not disclosed proactively.[5][4] Additionally, salaries leave out compensation received through health and retirement benefits, as well as benefits such as commuter allowances and cell phone reimbursements. This project aimed to close the gap and provide a more accurate picture of public employee salaries for the sake of public education and transparency.

See also

External links


References