Vote button trans.png
April's Project of the Month
It's spring time. It's primary election season!
Click here to find all the information you'll need to cast your ballot.




Roger Zilke recall, Berrien County, Michigan, 2010

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Recall
New recall logo.PNG
Historical recalls
Recall news
Recall laws
A petition to recall Drain Commissioner Roger Zilke was filed the week of September 7, 2009 in Berrien County, Michigan. In late April 2010, the recall effort was found to have failed to collect the approximately 13,000 signatures that were required to force a recall vote.[1]

The recall effort was initiated and filed by Ronald Zwar, a local business owner. According to Zwar, a recent drainage project - also known as the Hollywood Drain Project - sponsored by Zilke is a costly and unnecessary project for the county.[2]

Recall language

According to the latest filed recall language, Zilke has "been negligent in fulfilling current and past duties as drain commissioner by not maintaining the Bort and Lambrecht drain and the Miller and Beach drain as required by the Michigan State Drain Code Law." Additionally, the language states that Zilke proposed projects, such as the Hollywood Drain Project, that are "at exorbitant and excessively high costs in an extremely wasteful manner without concern to the taxpayer."[3]

Hollywood Drain Project

The Hollywood Drain Project to reduce flooding would be implemented in Lincoln, Saint Joseph and Royalton Townships and is estimated to be about $6 million.[4] Zwar argues that according to independent engineering studies a similar project can be implemented for as little as $400,000.[5]

On December 4, 2009 the commissioners voted 9-3 in favor a measure that could potentially mean that the county would have to pay off $750,000 in bonds for the proposed Hollywood Consolidated Drain project. The loan includes the preliminary engineering and easement acquisitions and the current interest rate is set at 2.49%.[6]

Path to the ballot

In order to force a recall election, supporters would have had to collect a minimum of 13,225 valid signatures.[6]

After the initial petition was rejected by Berrien County Election Commission, Zwar filed a new petition on September 25, 2009. The commission previously ruled that the recall language did not meet state standards of clarity.[3]

See also

External links

References