Read the State Legislative Tracker. New edition available now!

Sacramento, California municipal elections, 2014

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
2015


2014 Elections for Mayors and City CouncilsMunicipal Government Final.png

Municipal Elections
2014 Elections By State
2014 Elections By Date
Recent News

2014 Elections
AnaheimAnchorage
ArlingtonAustinBakersfield
ChandlerChesapeake
Chula VistaCorpus Christi
FremontFresnoGarland
GilbertGlendaleHonolulu
IrvineIrvingLaredo
LexingtonLong Beach
LouisvilleLubbockMesa
New OrleansNewarkNorfolk
OaklandOklahoma City
OrlandoPortlandReno
SacramentoSan Bernardino
San DiegoSan Francisco
San JoseSanta Ana
ScottsdaleStocktonTulsa
Virginia Beach
Washington, D.C.

Note: Cities listed in this box are those among the 100 largest in the United States that are holding elections in 2014.
The city of Sacramento, California will hold nonpartisan elections for city council on November 4, 2014. A primary election took place on June 3, 2014. The filing deadline for candidates wishing to run in Districts 1 and 5 was on March 7, 2014. The deadline for Districts 3 and 7 was March 12, 2014.[1]

Four seats are up for election. These include districts 1, 3, 5 and 7. Incumbents Angelique Ashby and Jay Schenirer are running for re-election in districts 1 and 5, respectively. The former is running unchallenged. Districts 3 and 7 are both open seats.

A special election for District 8 will coincide with the November 4 general election. The winner of this race will fill the seat vacated by Bonnie Pannell. Pannell, who was first elected to city council in 1998, announced her retirement in April 2014.[2] In the special election, the candidate with the most votes will be declared the winner. The city has stated that there will not be a runoff election for District 8.[3]

A "strong mayor" ballot measure and a housing development project are some of the key issues shaping Sacramento's 2014 election cycle.

City council

Candidate list

District 1

June 3 Primary election candidates:
  • Angelique Ashby Green check mark transparent.png - Incumbent Ashby was first elected to the council in 2010.

District 3

June 3 Primary election candidates:

November 4 General election candidates:

District 5

June 3 Primary election candidates:

District 7

June 3 Primary election candidates:

District 8

Note: District 8 is holding a special election to fill the seat vacated by Bonnie Pannell in April 2014.
November 4 Special election candidates:

Election results

Primary election

Sacramento City Council, District 1 Primary Election, 2014
Candidate Vote % Votes
Green check mark transparent.pngAngelique Ashby Incumbent 98% 5,140
Write-in 2% 107
Total Votes 5,247
Source: City of Sacramento - 2014 Election Results
Sacramento City Council, District 3 Primary Election, 2014
Candidate Vote % Votes
Green check mark transparent.pngJeff Harris 26.2% 2,382
Green check mark transparent.pngCyril Shah 23.6% 2,152
Ellen Cochrane 22.3% 2,034
Deane Dana 9.5% 866
Rosalyn Van Buren 9.2% 837
Efren Guttierrez 5.8% 524
Adam Sartain 3.2% 293
Write-in 0.2% 20
Total Votes 9,108
Source: City of Sacramento - 2014 Election Results
Sacramento City Council, District 5 Primary Election, 2014
Candidate Vote % Votes
Green check mark transparent.pngJay Schenirer Incumbent 62.4% 5,454
Ali Cooper 37.1% 3,245
Write-in 0.5% 42
Total Votes 8,741
Source: City of Sacramento - 2014 Election Results
Sacramento City Council, District 7 Primary Election, 2014
Candidate Vote % Votes
Green check mark transparent.pngRick Jennings 50.5% 5,165
Julius Cherry 41.9% 4,285
Abe Snobar 7.2% 732
Write-in 0.4% 39
Total Votes 10,221
Source: City of Sacramento - 2014 Election Results

Issues

Measure L

See also: City of Sacramento "Strong Mayor" Mayor-Council Form of Government Charter Amendment, Measure L (November 2014)

Sacramento's current form of government is a council-manager system. In November 2014, however, Sacramento voters will have the option to change this form of government to a strong mayor system by voting for or against a ballot measure called Measure L. Supporters of Measure L argue that a strong mayor system will streamline city government and enhance efficiency. Opponents, on the other hand, say that it places too much power in the hands of the mayor.[4]

City council candidates have been generally critical of the proposal. District 3 candidate Cyril Shah, for example, stated "While I personally oppose the Strong Mayor Proposal, as I believe the current governance structure creates a fair balance between neighborhood and city issues, the issue will soon be decided by the voters and I respect their judgment."[5] Shah's opponent, Jeff Harris, echoed this sentiment, stating, "I do not support this charter change. I believe it would weaken the communication between council members and department heads, leading to less efficacy in dealing with neighborhood issues. There is no provision for a tie-breaker if the council votes 4 to 4 on any given item. It would give the mayor the power to fire the city manager at will. The mayor could also veto ordinances, and have line item veto power over city budget items. It would require a super majority of council votes to override a mayoral veto. Additionally, the citizens would not have direct access to the Mayor via regular council meetings."[6]

McKinnley Village

Another issue in Sacramento is a housing development project called McKinnley Village. The project involves the development of over 300 single family homes on 50 acres of land in East Sacramento. The plan had been under discussion for several years until April 2014, when the Sacramento City Council voted six to three in favor of moving ahead with the project. Citizens of Sacramento have proven to be sharply divided on the issue, with many expressing concerns over how the McKinnley Village will affect traffic in the area as well as the local environment.[7]

The project has also attracted the attention of city council candidates, at least some of whom will be responsible for overseeing its execution and progress. In District 3, Shah noted, "Now that McKinley Village has been approved and is moving forward, we must continue to monitor its development as a community, ensure that the promises made regarding the project are fulfilled, and that the concerns of the community are addressed throughout its construction and beyond."[5] Harris has taken a more critical stance, saying, "I would not have voted for the project as proposed at City Council. In fact, I testified at the Planning Commission and at City Council against the proposal and I suggested ways to address the traffic concerns shared by so many residents in East Sacramento. The vote could have been worse. The project was not accepted "as is." Now we need to keep pressure on the Council to follow through and get this Alhambra underpass built. If I am elected, I will fight relentlessly to get an Alhambra access constructed!"[6]

Recent news

This section displays the most recent stories in a Google news search for the term Sacramento + California + election

All stories may not be relevant to this page due to the nature of the search engine.

Sacramento California Election News Feed

  • Loading...

See also

External links

BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Suggest a link

References