Vote button trans.png
April's Project of the Month
It's spring time. It's primary election season!
Click here to find all the information you'll need to cast your ballot.




Sequim Sales Tax Increase, 2009

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
A Sequim Sales Tax Increase was on the November 3 2009 ballot in Clallam County for voters in the City of Sequim.

The measure was approved.[1]

  • Yes: 1,373 (58.15%)Approveda
  • No: 988 (41.85%)

The measure will increase the sales tax rate in the city from Clallam County's 8.4 percent to 8.6 percent. The sales tax increase is anticipated to generate approximately $600,000 per year and the funds will be used for fixing the city's streets and lighting. Additionally funds may also be used for building neighborhood sidewalks.[2] In 2008 the same sales tax increase measure was proposed but failed to be approved by voters.[3]

Ballot summary

The ballot read:

"The Governing Board of the Transportation Benefit District of the City of Sequim, Washington, adopted Resolution No. R-2009-10 concerning a sales and use tax to finance transportation improvements. This proposition would authorize a sales and use tax of two-tenths of one percent (0.2%) to be collected within the District from all taxable retail sales in accordance with RCW 82.14.0455 for a term of ten years for the purpose of paying or financing a portion of the costs of transportation improvement projects, sidewalk and street repair and improvements, and model connectivity projects identified in the City of Sequim Transportation Improvement Plan and in Resolution No. R-2009-10. Should this proposition be approved?"[4]

Donors

A paving company, Lakeside Industries, which does little business within the city of Sequim, spent $1,285 on direct mailers trying to convince local residents to approve this tax increase. While they do not do much work on sidewalks or underground work within cities, which is what most of this money would be used for, they still promote the idea of the tax increase saying that it would only benefit the town because it can only be used to infrastructure improvements.[5]

External links

References