Talk:California Proposition 2, Standards for Confining Farm Animals (2008)
|| This page is part of WikiProject State Ballot Measures, a WikiProject including articles about:
To participate: join (or just read up) at the project page.
If you have any questions or comments please e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org.
|This page is part of WikiProject California, a WikiProject dedicated to articles related to California.|
I removed this paragraph from the article:
"Supporters of Prop 2 counter that the big agribusiness interests opposing the measure – masquerading as the deceptively named Californians for Safe Food – have a record of duping the public, harming animals, and polluting the environment. One of its biggest contributors, Moark LLC, paid big money to settle criminal animal cruelty charges for throwing live birds into a Dumpster, and another contributor, the United Egg Producers, paid $100,000 to settle false advertising allegations relating to misleading animal welfare claims brought by 17 attorneys general, including California’s."
There is no citation, and it is potentially libelous.Calgal 14:31, 13 July 2008 (EDT)
Does anyone know what to do with editorial boards that seem to be split on a prop?? If you look at the Davis Enterprise, one op-ed article supports, the other is against prop 2.