Vote button trans.png
April's Project of the Month
It's spring time. It's primary election season!
Click here to find all the information you'll need to cast your ballot.

Tenth Circuit Court shoots down Colorado's campaign finance requirement

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

November 10, 2010


DENVER, Colorado: Colorado campaign finance requirements for small groups supporting or opposing a ballot measure is burdensome according to a ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.[1]

The court's decision came about while reviewing a state law that requires that two or more people who spend more than $200 to report spending. The burden of such laws, the court said, outweighs ensuring the interest in ensuring fair elections. Specifically the case stemmed from a complaint filed against six homeowners who fought annexation in 2006 in the City of Parker. The six-person group raised and spent less than $1,000.[2]

"Colorado law, as applied to the plaintiffs, has violated their constitutional freedom of association. There is virtually no proper governmental interest in imposing disclosure requirements on ballot-initiative committees that raise and expend so little money," said the court.[3]

According to state law, all groups in support or opposition of a ballot measure are considered to be issue committees. Colorado law imposes $50 per day fines on committees that spend as much as $200 on a ballot measure and do not report. All committees are required to file campaign finance reports for any and all contributions of $20 or more.[4][5]

According to recent reports, the Colorado Secretary of State's office is still considering an appeal to the United States Supreme Court.[3]

The court's ruling can be read here.

See also

Ballotpedia News