Texas government sector lobbying
||This Sunshine Review article or section needs to be updated.
Note: the factual accuracy of this article may be compromised due to out-of-date information.
Please update the article to reflect recent events, and remove this template when finished.
This practice is controversial because public funds are spent to lobby for agendas not subject to direct approval by voters, and outcomes may be contrary taxpayers benefit.
Constitutionality of Texas government sector lobbying
In 2006, the Texas State Legislature investigated the practice of government sector lobbying and concluded that it is a legitimate practice. However, the committees involved saw that there are still ethical and constitutional problems to be addressed.
- See also: Texas government sector lobbying report
Disclosure required of registered lobbyists on behalf of public entities is poorly enforced according to some reports (see below). These allegations also stress the difficulty of holding localities and public officials accountable when reporting regulations are relaxed.
In 2006, Americans for Prosperity, a free market and limited government advocacy group involved in investigating government sector lobbying, reported several flaws with the disclosure system the taxpayer-funded lobbyists are required to follow by the Texas Ethics Commission. Some of these concerns included:
- Lobbyists are not required to indicate whether their client receives public funding. "Entities such as schools obviously receive taxpayer funds, but others are not possible to discern without a FOIA request."
- Many entities are not subject to FOIA, even if they receive public dollars.
- Many clients are alphabetized incorrectly throughout the TEC document.
- Lobbyists for the same client will report that client’s name differently, making it impossible to locate clients in one location (for example, "The City of Austin" and "Austin City").
The Texas House of Representatives produced a report on ethical matters and government sector lobbying in 2006. The report found that there were glaring flaws in the disclosure and tracking of the spending of taxpayer funds. For example, local governments were reported as represented by a lobbyist without their knowledge, and some cities were listed twice ("City of Birmingham" and "Birmingham," for example). The report recommended open, full, and consistent disclosure of lobbying expenditures to be strictly enforced.
Taxpayer-funded lobbying associations
City and municipal
- Texas Association of Counties
- Texas Conference of Urban Counties
- Texas Association of County Officials
- Texas Association of County Auditors
- Texas School Alliance
- Texas Association of Community Schools
- Texas Association of School Business Officials
- Texas Association of Secondary School Principals
- Texas Association of School Boards
- Texas Association of School Administrators
- Texas Association of School Personnel Administrators
- South Texas Association of Schools
- Building Officials Association of Texas
- Government Finance Officers Association of Texas
- Texas Fire Chiefs Association
- Texas Chapter of the American Planning Association
- Texas Police Chiefs Association
- Texas Public Works Association
- Texas City Attorneys Association