For status updates, visit lucyburns.org.
Ballotpedia's coverage of elections held on March 3, 2015, was limited. Select races were covered live, and all results will be added once the merger is complete.
United States Farm Bill 2013
- 1 Key farm bill terms
- 2 Congressional timeline
- 3 Spending contentions
- 4 U.S. Senate
- 5 U.S. House
- 6 SNAP challenge
- 7 See also
- 8 External links
- 9 References
The vast majority of the $1 trillion farm bill was nutrition--roughly 75% of the total bill. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) made up about 72% of the nutrition budget. Crop insurance was the second largest budgetary expense.
Nutrition and federal spending were in the cross hairs of the farm bill debate. Republicans sought cuts to the food assistance programs and Democrats were concerned with crop insurance fraud. In an effort to push through some type of farm bill, the House attempted to split food stamps from farm policy and create two separate bills in September 2013. This would have been the first time since 1973 that food stamps split from farm policy. Despite the split bill being passed in the House, it stalled in the Senate in September 2013.
After the first round of debate in September 2013, Congress did not revisit the bill until early 2014. On January 29, 2014, the U.S. House approved the Federal Agriculture Reform and Risk Management Act of 2013, H.R. 2642, also known as the Farm Bill. The bill passed by a vote of 251-166. The nearly 1,000-page bill reformed and continued various programs of the Department of Agriculture through 2018. The $1 trillion bill expanded crop insurance for farmers by $7 billion over the next decade and created new subsidies for rice and peanut growers that would kick in when prices drop. However, cuts to the food stamp program cut an average of $90 per month for 1.7 million people in 15 states. On February 4, 2014, the Democratic controlled Senate approved the Federal Agriculture Reform and Risk Management Act of 2013, H.R. 2642, also known as the Farm Bill.
Key farm bill terms
What is crop insurance?
|“||Under the contract, the insured farmer agrees to insure all the eligible acreage of a crop planted in a particular county...
The insurance provider agrees to indemnify (that is, to protect) the insured farmer against losses that occur during the crop year. In most cases, the insurance covers loss of yield exceeding a deductible amount. Losses must be due to unavoidable perils beyond the farmer's control.
How does the dairy price support program work?
|“||The purpose of DPPSP (Dairy Product Price Support Program) is to establish minimum purchase prices to support the price of nonfat dry milk (NDM), butter, and cheddar cheese through purchases of such products made from cows milk produced in the United States (U.S.). The Secretary of Agriculture (Secretary) may increase the purchase prices when it is considered to be appropriate.||”|
What exactly is the SNAP program?
|“||SNAP, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, is the program formerly known as food stamps. It is a federal nutrition program that helps you stretch your food budget and buy healthy food.||”|
June 10, 2013: The United States Senate passed a new farm bill that cuts $24 billion in spending. In this bill, the food stamp program would lose $4.1 billion over the next ten years. Conservation programs would lose $3.5 billion. Direct payments to farmers would be eliminated, saving $5 billion per year and making crop insurance the major source of assistance. The bill adds subsidies for rice and peanut farmers to compensate for the direct payment cuts. It also keeps the controversial catfish inspection program. The bill passed 66-27.
June 20, 2013: The United States House of Representatives defeated the farm bill in a 234-195 vote. This bill would have cut $40 billion from the nutrition program over the next ten years. The food stamp program would lose $20.5 billion of that $40 billion. The bill would have ended direct payments to farmers and instead created new subsidies for peanut, cotton and rice farmers. It would have brought back livestock insurance programs.
July 11, 2012: The United States House of Representatives passed a watered-down version of the farm bill in a 216-208 vote. The bill passed included farm policy, but did not include food stamps. It also included the "Protect Interstate Commerce Act" amendment from Steve King. The amendment prevents states from applying their own laws on agricultural products to agricultural products from another state.. King introduced the amendment in response to a law in California, requiring a larger size cage for egg-producing chickens. King represents Iowa, which is a large egg producer.
September 19, 2013: The United States House of Representatives approved a measure on a food stamp bill that would save almost $40 billion over the next ten years by cutting the SNAP program by 5%. According to the Congressional Budget Office, this could affect 3.8 million Americans.
|SNAP funding measure, September 19, 2013|
|Party||Votes for bill||Votes against bill||Total votes|
January 29, 2014: The United States House of Representatives passed a five-year reauthorization of the farm bill in a 251-166 vote. The bill included the elimination of direct payments, improved crop insurance tools, permanent livestock disaster assistance program, dairy policy reform with voluntary livestock margin protection program and no government mandated supply controls. The bill also made $8 billion in cuts to food stamps.
February 4, 2014: The United States Senate passed the reauthorization of the bill in a 68-32 vote. The nearly 1,000-page bill reformed and continued various programs of the Department of Agriculture through 2018. The $1 trillion bill expanded crop insurance for farmers by $7 billion over the next decade and created new subsidies for rice and peanut growers that would kick in when prices drop.
- Senators John McCain and Jeanne Shaheen, along with the Obama administration, aimed to eliminate a catfish inspection program from the farm bill. An identical program was already run by the Food and Drug Administration and the farm bill program was seen as a waste of money.
- Representatives Tom Petri and Ron Kind called for crop insurance reforms, amid reports of fraud losses over $100 million dollars.
- June 10, 2013: Alexander explained his support for the Senate farm bill. He said, "Agriculture is one of Tennessee's most important industries, with more than 77,000 farms contributing tens-of-billions of dollars each year to the state's economy. Not only does this legislation provide certainty to farmers, it also saves taxpayers nearly $18 billion by modernizing programs that impact our nation's food supply."
- June 10, 2013: Grassley released a statement following his vote of support for the Senate farm bill. He said, "The bill that cleared the Senate tonight is a step in the right direction. Having responsible payment limits on the commodity program is crucial to the defensibility of the farm safety-net. We need payment caps on our commodity programs, and we need to close loopholes that have allowed non-farmers to game the system. I hope the House takes notice at the reforms in the Senate-passed bill and sees the positive changes we made to the farm payment system. And, while the inclusion of my payment limits plan is very reform-minded, the target price program that is included in the final bill will take us back a step. Target prices distort planting decisions, and I hear opposition to it from Iowa farmers all the time. We’ve tried it before and it doesn’t work." He concluded, "While I continue to have concerns about the potential impacts of the shallow loss and target price programs created in this farm bill, I would also agree with the overwhelming sentiment from Iowa farmers that they need to have certainty. A five-year farm bill that includes my payment limit reforms, maintains the crop insurance program, and streamlines conservation programs gives that certainty."
- June 20, 2013: Stabenow released a statement after the House farm bill failed. She said, "Twice the Senate has overwhelmingly passed a bipartisan Farm Bill that reforms farm programs, ends direct payments, cuts spending, and creates American agriculture jobs. The House needs to find a way to get a five year Farm Bill done. The Speaker needs to work in a bipartisan way and present a bill that Democrats and Republicans can support. He could start by bringing the Senate bill to the floor for a vote. Maintaining the status quo means no reform, no deficit reduction, and further uncertainty that slows growth in our agriculture industry. This is totally unacceptable."
- August 20, 2013: "We have many things in the bill that make it worth passing. We are making major changes to help farmers markets and conservation with major new effort to protect the Great Lakes. We added something called bio-base manufacturing to create jobs and help us stop using petroleum for plastics and let us use food by-products to help get us off of foreign oil. The bottom line is every community is benefited from rural development, so we need to get the farm bill done."
- September 9, 2013: "It's time to stop kicking the can down the road and leaving rural America and 16 million jobs hanging in uncertainty. The Senate has agreed to go to conference and appointed conferees, and whenever the House decides to do the same we can move forward and finish the Farm Bill. I do not support an extension because it is bad policy that yields no deficit reduction, no reform and does nothing to help American agriculture create jobs. It's time to do the work we were sent here to do and finally finish this Farm Bill."
- June 10, 2013: Johnson explained why he voted against the Senate farm bill. He said, "Its positive provisions, such as improved risk management, are outweighed by negative ones, such as government regulated dairy supply management and sugar subsidies. I hope the Senate can soon begin work on legislation that genuinely addresses the real problems that farm and dairy families are dealing with every day."
- June 11, 2013: Rubio made a statement on the House floor explaining why he voted against the farm bill. He said, "With an overall cost of nearly $1 trillion, this legislation is more than we can afford at a time when our debt of nearly $17 trillion is growing rapidly each day. While I support some of the programs in this bill that are important to Florida and our State's important role in America's food supply, we cannot allow Washington to continue spending recklessly and condemning our children and grandchildren to a diminished future. I remain committed to championing sound policy important to the farmers and working families that contribute to the agriculture industry's success and whose products ultimately end up at our dinner tables. It is why I am pursuing reforms in other areas that would benefit our farmers and our Nation. For example, I continue working towards national immigration reform, which would help create a guest worker visa program to ensure an adequate agriculture workforce. This reform would achieve an agricultural workers program that allows us to bring in both temporary and long-term laborers to provide our farms, dairies and other agricultural industries with the workers they need and in a way that also protects the dignity and safety of those workers."
- June 10, 2013: Whitehouse explained in a speech on the Senate floor, "The farm bill is important and wide-ranging legislation. Unfortunately, the bill before the Senate leaves out essential protections for low-income Americans, hard-hit fisheries, and precious natural resources."
- September 16, 2013: Lucas expressed frustration over getting a farm bill passed. He said in an interview with Agritalk, "It shouldn’t be this hard to make sure everybody has enough to eat. The other thing I would say is, the magnitude by which (Ranking Member Rep.) Collin (Peterson (D-MN)) and I have been pelted from both the left and the right, this is not a political issue."
No House Democrats voted for the House bill on September 19, 2013.
- Tom Petri: Note: Although Petri voted in favor of the farm bill, he introduced an amendment with Ron Kind calling for reforms.
- May 15, 2013: Petri gave a speech on the House floor expressing support for the crop insurance amendment he and Ron Kind authored. He said, "I'm glad to be a part of this bipartisan effort to make important changes to the crop insurance program. Currently, the federal government subsidizes roughly 62% of farmers' crop insurance premiums at a cost of $9 billion a year. But America's small farmers received only 27% of the subsidies. This bill keeps in place a safety net for farmers who need assistance, while ensuring the program is not exploited at a cost to taxpayers."
- September 12, 2013: A rally was held on Capitol Hill, featuring Wisconsin Representatives Tom Petri and Ron Kind. The rally was meant to draw attention to crop insurance, which is currently paid for by taxpayers. Kind and Petri called for reforms of the program.
- September 10, 2013: McGovern expressed his concern with deep nutrition program cuts. He said, "There are 50 million people in the United States of America who are hungry, 17 million are kids. It is something we all should be ashamed of, and the United States House of Representatives is about to make that worse. This is a big deal and my hope is that we'll treat it as such and not just let it go by without a lot of discussion and debate because we're all focused on Syria."
- September 10, 2013: Barbara Lee spoke out against proposed cuts to the food stamp program. She said, "Republicans are introducing $40 billion in cuts to SNAP, our nation's most effective anti-hunger program, and they're hoping that our attention is split and Congress is focusing only on Syria. We can and must also be working to come together and defeat this serious threat to our nation's most vulnerable."