Wisconsin Amendment to Overturn Citizens United Ruling Question (2016)
Federal Constitutional Issues
|Not on ballot|
Text of measure
The proposed ballot question reads as follows:
|“|| The U.S. Supreme Court’s decisions in Citizens United and related cases allow unlimited spending to influence local, state, and federal elections. To allow all Americans to have an equal say in our democracy, shall Wisconsin’s congressional delegation support, and the Wisconsin legislature ratify, an amendment to the U.S. Constitution stating:
The United States Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) held that political contributions and spending were protected as "free speech." In 2012, voters in both Montana and Colorado passed initiatives by 3 to 1 majorities asking their respective delegations to the U.S. Congress to support a constitutional amendment that would effectively overturn the high court's ruling.
- Lisa Subeck, executive director of United Wisconsin, argued, “Unlimited election spending by corporations and special interest groups has drowned out the voice of the people in our elections, and urgent action is needed to restore our democracy. Wisconsinites will continue raising their voices until fundamental reforms to our broken campaign finance system are enacted, starting with the reversal of Citizens United.”
- Darin Von Ruden, president of the Wisconsin Farmers Union, claimed that the Citizens United ruling had a particularly negative effect on rural constituents. He said, “When I look at this, it seems to me that there’s a whole lot of money just going back and forth: campaign contributions from urban and suburban areas coming in, and tax dollars to urban and suburban areas going out. Those of us who are paying taxes in rural areas aren’t getting our full share of the American promise of representative government. We need to bring an end to unlimited and unaccountable campaign spending. That is why I and fellow members of Wisconsin Farmers Union support an end to the era of unlimited money in politics, and are advocating for a Constitutional amendment stating that unions, corporations and special interest groups are not people, and money is not speech.”
Media editorial positions
- The Capital Times, supporting a similar proposal in 2014, said, "Scheduling two advisory referendums for this fall would be easy, and inexpensive — as Wisconsinites will already be voting for governor, statewide and county posts, legislative seats and Congress. It would also generate interest in the election, potentially drawing more voters to the polls. The people of Wisconsin, not out-of-state corporations and their Washington-based henchmen, should decide whether Wisconsin calls for changing the U.S. Constitution."
Path to the ballot
The measure needed to pass through both chambers of the state legislature in order to place the nonbinding question on the ballot.
On January 21, 2013, a coalition looking to overturn the Citizens United decision delivered 24,000 petition signatures to the Wisconsin General Assembly. The petitions called on legislators to pass Assembly Joint Resolution 50. On August 27, 2013, AJR 50 was introduced into the Wisconsin Legislature. Democrats in the Wisconsin House of Representatives tried to force the legislation to come up for a vote, but Republicans successfully blocked the measure in a 60 to 29 vote. On March 21, 2014, the assembly adjourned for the year without voting on the measure.
- California Proposition 49, Amendment to Overturn Citizens United Ruling Question (2014)
- California "Corporations Are Not People" Initiative (2012)
- Colorado Corporate Contributions Amendment, Amendment 65 (2012)
- Montana Corporate Contributions Initiative, I-166 (2012)
- Assembly Joint Resolution 8
- Senate Joint Resolution 12
- Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
- The Rock River Times, "‘Citizens United’ referendum introduced in Wisconsin," January 21, 2015
- Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.
- SCOTUS Blog, "Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission," accessed February 13, 2014
- The Capital Times, "Lisa Subeck: Pass resolution to put advisory on Citizens United to the voters," January 22, 2014
- La Crosse Tribune, "Guest View: Get big money out of politics," January 23, 2014
- The Capital Times, "Let Wisconsin vote on balanced budget, Citizens United," February 12, 2014
- Wisconsin Legislature, "Assembly Joint Resolution 50," accessed January 21, 2014
State of Wisconsin
|State executive officers||
Governor | Lieutenant Governor | Attorney General | Secretary of State | Treasurer | State Auditor | Superintendent of Public Instruction | Commissioner of Insurance | Secretary of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection| Secretary of Natural Resources | Secretary of Workforce Development | Public Service Commission |