Arizona State Legislators Salaries, Proposition 302 (2006)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Voting on
Salaries of
Government Officials
Salaries of government officials.jpg
Ballot Measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot
Arizona Constitution
Flag of Arizona.png
Preamble
Articles
1234566.178910111213141516171819202122252627282930
Arizona Proposition 302, also known as the State Legislators Salaries was on the November 7, 2006 election ballot in Arizona as a legislatively-referred constitutional amendment. It was defeated.[1]

Election results

State Legislators Salaries
ResultVotesPercentage
Defeatedd No774,92852.3%
Yes 707,861 47.7%
Election results from Arizona Elections Department.

Text of measure

Ballot language

RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMISSION ON SALARIES FOR ELECTIVE STATE OFFICERS AS TO LEGISLATIVE SALARIES HAS BEEN CERTIFIED TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE AND IS HEREBY SUBMITTED TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS FOR THEIR APPROVAL OR REJECTION.

PROVIDES FOR AN INCREASE IN THE SALARIES OF STATE LEGISLATORS FROM $24,000 TO $36,000 PER YEAR.

"SHALL THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMISSION ON SALARIES FOR ELECTIVE STATE OFFICERS CONCERNING LEGISLATIVE SALARIES BE ACCEPTED?"

YES NO

RECOMMENDATIONS, IF APPROVED BY THE ELECTORS, SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE BEGINNING OF THE NEXT REGULAR LEGISLATIVE SESSION WITHOUT ANY OTHER AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION.

CURRENT SALARY ............................................. $24,000

PROPOSED SALARY .......................................... $36,000

A "yes" vote shall have the effect of raising State Legislators' salaries to $36,000 per year. YES

A "no" vote shall have the effect of keeping State Legislators' salaries at $24,000 per year. NO[2][3]

Full text

The full text of the legislation proposed by Proposition 302 is available here.

See also

BallotpediaAvatar bigger.png
Suggest a link

External links

References

  1. Arizona 2006 election results
  2. Arizona Secretary of State, 2006 Ballot Propositions & Judicial Performance Review Proposition 302
  3. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.