WhoRunsTheStates Badge.png
Who Runs Your State Government?
Does your state lean blue or lean red? Check out our new report, highlighting partisan control of state government from 1992-2013.






California Proposition 105, Disclosures to Consumers, Voters and Investors (1988)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

California Proposition 105 was on the November 8, 1988 statewide ballot in California as a initiated state statute where it was approved.
  • Yes: 4,864,674 (54.5%) Approveda
  • No: 4,046,654 (45.5%)

Proposition 105 requires the disclosure of specific types of information about:

  • Household toxic products.
  • Seniors' health insurance
  • Nursing homes
  • Donors to statewide ballot measures.
  • Corporations that sell stock in California.

Ballot summary

The official ballot summary said, "Measure requires, as specified, the following disclosures: (1) advertisers' warnings regarding disposal of toxic household products with exceptions; (2) notices regarding coverage limits and insurance offeror's identity on insurance policies to supplement Medicare; (3) disclosures in nursing home contracts and advertisements regarding access to State Ombudsman and facility violation information; (4) disclosures by initiative and referendum campaign committees as to contributors; and (5) disclosures by corporations selling stocks in state whether or not they are doing business in South Africa or with any person or group located there."

Fiscal impact

The fiscal estimate provided by the California Legislative Analyst's Office said, "The adoption of this measure would result in costs to various state agencies to operate toll-free telephone lines, develop regulations, and keep records. The net annual costs could be up to $550,000 when the measure is fully implemented. These costs would be partially offset by unknown revenues from fines charged to people or companies who violate the disclosure requirements."

Lawsuits

Lawsuits relating to Proposition 105 include:

  • Chemical Specialities Mfrs. Assn. v. Deukmejan. 227 Cal. App. 3d 663, 278 Cal. Rptr. 128 (1991).
  • San Mateo County Coastal Landowners' Assn. v. County of San Mateo. 38 Cal. App. 4th 523, 45 Cal. Rptr. 2d 117 (1995).

External links

BallotpediaAvatar bigger.png
Suggest a link

Flag of California.png

This California-related article is a stub. You can help people learn about California politics by expanding it.

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Encyclopedia
Calendars
Get Involved
Donate
Toolbox