California Proposition 1C (May 2009)

From Ballotpedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

California Proposition 1C (May 2009) is one of six ballot propositions that appeared on the May 19 ballot in California. Prop 1C, a legislatively-referred constitutional amendment, was defeated.[1]
  • Yes: 1,708,800 (35.6%)
  • No: 3,085,138 (64.4%) Defeated

Proposition 1C was part of the ill-fated 2009-2010 California state budget and tax increase agreement.[2],[3]

Proposition 1C would have authorized borrowing against future lottery proceeds as a way to avoid state government spending cuts. The 2009-2010 budget plan includes $5 billion from this source, and the measure would also authorize similar borrowing in future years. It does not include a cap on the amount of future lottery revenue that could be pledged to pay for current spending. Essentially, the measure would allow a form of deficit spending that is not subject to the balanced budget provisions adopted by a vote of the people in California Proposition 58 (2004).

The proposal would also have repealed the current requirement that lottery revenue be used only for education. Instead, the legislature could appropriate lottery revenue for any purpose. However, the measure would require the legislature to appropriate general fund revenues to education in an amount equivalent to the lottery revenues that went to schools in FY 2008-2009, adjusted for inflation and changes in student counts.

It would also have revised lottery management details, including repealing a competitive bidding requirement for certain lottery operations, and lowering the cap on the amount of lottery revenue that can be used for administration purposes from 16 percent to 13 percent (which is the amount currently used for administration).[4]

Background

Proposition 1C is one of six statewide ballot propositions placed on the May 2009 ballot as part of the 2009-2010 California state budget and tax increase agreement (Propositions 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, 1E and 1F). They are intended to close an approximately $42 billion gap between desired spending and expected revenues. In absolute terms, however, as of March, 2009 projections, when the budget deal's $10 billion tax increase and the $5 billion in borrowed money proposed by Proposition 1C are included, total general fund spending in the 2009-2010 budget will only decline by around 2 percent, from $94.089 billion to $92.206 billion.[5] However, the nonpartisan California Legislative Analyst's Office which is the source of those figures, also said in early March that tax revenues flowing into the state treasury are "well below" the projections it used earlier in the year, and that California's government now faces an additional $8 billion gap betweeen expected revenue and the amount appropriated. [6]

The measure was introduced in the California State Legislature by Don Perata and supported by Noreen Evans. For details on the measure, see ballot title, summary and analysis from the California Legislative Analyst's Office.

Supporters

Main article: Supporters of California Proposition 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, 1E or 1F (May 2009)

Supporters of Proposition 1C may use the title given it by its legislative proponents, the "Lottery Modernization Act." (The measure's formal designation at that stage was Senate Constitutional Amendment 12). They include:

  • Budget Reform Now, a coalition of groups assembled by the governor to support the overall 2009-2010 budget agreement and tax increases.
  • On April 26, the California Democratic Party, meeting in its annual convention, endorsed Proposition 1C.[7]

Opponents

Opponents of Proposition 1C include:

News Coverage and Editorials

A Los Angeles Times article on February 20 described Proposal 1C as one that "threatens to plunge the state deep back into the red."[3],[10]

Polling information

See also Public opinion polling for all May 2009 statewide ballot propositions
  • The Field Poll conducted a public opinion research survey between February 20 and March 1 on Proposition 1C and the other five budget-related measures that will appear on the May 19 ballot. Of the six statewide propositions polled, Proposition 1C showed the weakest level of support.[11],[12]
  • On April 20-21, SurveyUSA conducted a poll of 1,300 California adults for KABC-TV Los Angeles, KPIX-TV San Francisco, KGTV-TV San Diego, and KFSN-TV Fresno. 15% of the registered voters they spoke with had already cast their vote. They concluded that for Proposition 1C, opposition had grown over the last six weeks.[15]
  • Field conducted a second poll between April 16-26 that indicates that "voters strongly oppose" five of the six budget measures on the May 19 ballot, including Prop 1C. According to Field Poll Director Mark DiCamillo, "The majority of voters just doesn't believe what is being sold to them. The skepticism extends up and down the ballot. Voters feel the Legislature isn't doing its job, hasn't been able to work with the governor and is just passing these things on to them."[16]
Date of Poll Pollster In favor Opposed Undecided
February 20-March 1 Field 47 percent 39 percent 14 percent
March 10-17 PPIC 37 percent 50 percent 11 percent
March 11-12 SurveyUSA 28 percent 29 percent 43 percent
April 20-21 SurveyUSA 23 percent 41 percent 35 percent
April 16-26 Field 32 percent 59 percent 9 percent
April 27 - May 4 PPIC 32 percent 58 percent 10 percent
May 8-10 SurveyUSA 29 percent 52 percent 19 percent
May 15-17 SurveyUSA 29 percent 56 percent 16 percent

Newspaper opinions

Yes on 1C

Newspapers endorsing a "yes" vote on Proposition 1C include:

  • The Los Angeles Times, which wrote, "...we cannot be as cheerful as the campaign ads that began running last week...but the good outweighs the bad... Without the $5 billion it brings, California would have to make up the difference by again raising taxes or by making deeper, and ultimately more expensive, cuts."[17]

No on 1C

Media endorsing a "no" vote on Proposition 1C include:

  • La Prensa San Diego, which says, "The problem with this proposition is that as a state we are becoming more and more dependent on the vices of gambling to solve our problems, not only the lottery but the casino businesses. The lottery is sustained by the poor of our community! They spend a disproportionate amount of their money on lotto tickets with the hope that this may put them on easy street. In essence we are asking the poor, those who can least afford it, to balance our state budget!"[18]

External links


Center for Government Studies Review of 1C

Basic information

Supporters

Opponents

References

  1. ↑ Sacramento Bee, "Angry voters whack budget, politicians", May 20, 2009
  2. ↑ Los Angeles Times, "The Next Special Election: April? May? June?", February 9, 2009
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 Los Angeles Times, "With budget stalemate over, next move is up to California voters", February 20, 2009
  4. ↑ San Francisco Chronicle, "Proposition 1C makes a bet on future lottery sales", May 7, 2009
  5. ↑ 2009 Budget Act General Fund Budget Summary With All Budget Solutions, Legislative Analyst's Office, updated March, 2009
  6. ↑ San Diego Union-Tribune, "State budget springs a leak", March 14, 2009
  7. ↑ Los Angeles Times, "State Democrats decline to endorse 3 of 6 ballot measures", April 27, 2009
  8. ↑ Mercury News, "Support, opposition for May ballot propositions", March 25, 2009
  9. ↑ San Francisco Chronicle, "Leader of anti-gambling churches vs. Prop. 1C", April 19, 2009
  10. ↑ Inside Bay Area, "Editorial: Budget deal a step forward, but voters must pass five ballot measures", February 15, 2009
  11. ↑ Sacramento Bee, "Field Poll shows early backing for budget items on ballot", March 4, 2009
  12. ↑ Field Poll results for initial polling on six budget measures on May 19 ballot
  13. ↑ Sacramento Bee, "Budget ballot measures face uphill fight", March 26, 2009
  14. ↑ Public Policy Institute of California, "Special Election Ballot Propositions Face Tough Road", March 25, 2009
  15. ↑ SurveyUSA, "One Month From California Special Election, Opposition Grows to 5 of 6 Ballot Measures", April 22, 2009
  16. ↑ Sacramento Bee, "Field Poll: California voters oppose five of six May 19 ballot measures", April 19, 2009
  17. ↑ Los Angeles Times, "Yes on 1A, 1C, 1D, 1E and 1F", April 26, 2009
  18. ↑ La Prensa San Diego, "California Special Election Recommendations", May 1, 2009
Flag of California
v • d • e
State of California
Sacramento (capital)
Ballot Measures

History of I&R | City and county ballot initiatives | School district bond issues | Laws governing initiatives | Recall process |

Ballot measures by year

1912 • 1914 • 1916 • 1920 • 1922 • 1978 • 1980 • 1982 • 1984 • 1986 • 1988 • 1990 • 1992 • 1993 • 1994 • 1996 • 1998 • 2000 • 2002 • 2003 • 2004 • 2005 • 2006 • 2006 (local) • 2007 • 2008 • 2008 (local) • 2009 • 2009 (local) • 2010

Government

California State Constitution | Governor | Attorney General | Secretary of State | State assembly | State senate |

Elections

Recalls | Vote fraud | 2010 elections |

Judiciary

California Supreme Court | Courts of Appeal | Superior Courts | District Courts | Judicial selection in California | Judicial News |

Transparency Topics

Public Records Act | Transparency Checklist | Government corruption reports | Transparency Legislation | Open Records procedures | Transparency Advocates | State budget | Taxpayer-funded lobbying associations |

Divisions

State | List of counties | List of Cities | List of School Districts, A - L | List of School Districts, M - Y |
Evaluation of county websites | Evaluation of city websites | Evaluation of township websites | Evaluation of school district websites |

Retrieved from "http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/California_Proposition_1C_(May_2009)"
Personal tools