Does your state lean blue or lean red? Check out our new report, highlighting partisan control of state government from 1992-2013.
California Proposition 28, Repeal of "First Five" Cigarette Taxes (2000)
From Ballotpedia
| Voting on Tobacco | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ballot Measures | |||
| By state | |||
| By year | |||
| Not on ballot | |||
|
Contents |
Proposition 28 would have eliminated some provisions of Proposition 10, the "First 5 Early Childhood Cigarette Tax" approved by voters on November 3, 1988.
Specifically, Proposition 28 would have:
- Eliminated the California Children and Families First Trust Fund, once all previously collected taxes under Proposition 10 were appropriated and expended.
- Eliminated the 50 cents per pack excise tax on cigarettes and the equivalent tax on other tobacco products imposed by Proposition 10, which were effective January 1, 1999.
- Eliminated the increase in the pre-existing excise tax imposed on other tobacco products which took effect July 1, 1999.[1]
Election results
| Proposition 28 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
| 5,230,734 | 72.2% | |||
| Yes | 2,017,425 | 27.8% | ||
Text of measure
Title
The ballot title was:
Summary
The summary of the ballot measure prepared by the California Attorney General read:
- Repeals additional $.50 per pack tax on cigarettes and equivalent increase in tax on tobacco products enacted by Proposition 10 (1998).
- Provides for elimination of funding for Proposition 10 early childhood development and smoking prevention programs.
- Prohibits imposition of additional surtaxes on distribution of cigarettes or tobacco products unless enacted by state legislature.
- Provides for termination of California Children and Families First Trust Fund once all previously collected taxes under Proposition 10 are appropriated and expended.
Fiscal impact
- See also: Fiscal impact statement
The California Legislative Analyst's Office provided an estimate of net state and local government fiscal impact for Proposition 28. That estimate was:
- Reduction in annual state special fund revenues of approximately $670 million that would otherwise be allocated for early childhood development programs and activities.
- Relatively small annual increases in Proposition 99 revenues of a few million dollars.
- Annual decreases in state General Fund revenues of approximately $7 million and local government sales tax revenues of about $6 million.
- Loss of potential long-term state and local governmental savings that could otherwise result from Proposition 10.
Campaign donations
$1,109,741 was spent in favor of the measure. $3,394,627 was spent opposing the measure.
Some of the donors opposing the measure were:
- Stephen Bing, $2,167,430
- Jerry Perenchio, $250,000
See also
External links
- Official Voter Guide to Proposition 28
- Full text of Proposition 28
- Official declaration of the March 7, 2000 vote
- Smart Voter on Proposition 28
- Cal Voter on Prop 28
- Top Ten contributors
- High tobacco taxes won't make the problem go away
References
| ||||||||||||||||||||||