California Proposition 4, Prohibition on Trapping Fur-Bearing Mammals (1998)
|Voting on the|
Treatment of Animals
|Not on ballot|
Proposition 4 placed new restrictions on the use of traps and poisons to capture and kill specified mammals for various purposes.
Of voters who cast a vote in this election, 809,003 or 9.38% did not cast a vote on Proposition 4.
Text of measure
The ballot title was:
The official ballot summary said:
- Prohibits trapping mammals classified as fur-bearing or nongame with specified traps for recreation or commerce in fur.
- Prohibits commerce in raw fur of such mammals trapped with specified traps in California.
- Prohibits use of steel-jawed leghold traps on wildlife mammals and dogs and cats except for padded steel-jawed traps used by government officials where it is the only way to protect human health and safety.
- Prohibits all use of sodium fluoroacetate (Compound 1080) or sodium cyanide to poison any animal.
- Provides misdemeanor penalties.
The California Legislative Analyst's Office provided an estimate of net state and local government fiscal impact for Proposition 4. That estimate was:
- Negligible annual revenue losses to the Department of Fish and Game (DFG).
- Unknown enforcement costs to DFG, ranging from negligible to several hundred thousand dollars annually.
- Unknown state and local costs to implement alternative animal control methods of several hundred thousand dollars to in the range of a couple of million dollars annually, depending on relative cost-effectiveness of alternative methods.
- Negligible annual loss in personal income tax revenue in the context of total state General Fund revenues.
Supporters of Proposition 4 spent $1,323,450. The top contributors to pass the measure were:
- International Fund for Animal Welfare: $241,844
- Humane Society of the United States: $221,652
- The Ark Trust: $99,195
- American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA): $72,337
- Doris Day Animal League: $61,851
- Animal Protection Institute: $58,447
- The Fund for Animals: $24,952
- Barbara Clapp: $15,087
- Karen Bunting: $15,000
- Dena Jones: $10,000
Opponents of Proposition 4 spent $508,658. The top contributors against the measure were:
- California Farm Bureau Federation: $83,630
- The Wildlife Legislative Fund of America: $39,124
- California Outdoor Enthusiast Coalition: $29,000
- National Trappers Assn., Inc.: $19,090
- California Cattleman's Association: $10,825
- Kern County Wool Growers: $10,000
- California Business Political Action Commmittee (CALBUSPAC): $10,000
- California Correctional Peace Officers Association PAC: $10,000
- Ballot Issues Coalition: $9,000
- California Trappers Association: $8,500
State of California
|Ballot measures by year||
1910 | 1911 | 1912 | 1914 | 1915 | 1916 | 1919 | 1920 | 1922 | 1924 | 1926 | 1928 | 1930 | 1932 | 1933 | 1934 | 1935 | 1936 | 1938 | 1939 | 1940 | 1942 | 1944 | 1946 | 1948 | 1949 | 1950 | 1952 | 1954 | 1956 | 1958 | 1960 | 1962 | 1964 | 1966 | 1968 | 1970 | 1972 | 1973 | 1974 | 1976 | 1978 | 1980 | 1982 | 1984 | 1986 | 1988 | 1990 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1996 | 1998 | 2000 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2006 (local) | 2008 | 2008 (local) | 2009 | 2009 (local) | 2010 | 2010 (local) | 2011 (local) | 2012 | 2012 (local) | 2014 | 2016 |
|State executive offices||
Governor | Attorney General | Secretary of State | Controller | Treasurer | State Auditor | Superintendent of Public Instruction | Commissioner of Insurance | Secretary of Agriculture | Secretary for Natural Resources | Director of Industrial Relations | President of Public Utilities |
List of Counties |
List of Cities |
California school districts A - L |
California school districts M - Z |