Who Runs Your State Government?
Does your state lean blue or lean red? Check out our new report, highlighting partisan control of state government from 1992-2013.

City of Compton Increase of City Council Districts, Measure P (June 2009)

From Ballotpedia

(Redirected from City of Compton Increase of City Council Districts, Measure P, June 2009)

Jump to: navigation, search

1 Election results
2 See also
3 External links

A City of Compton Change in Election Dates, Measure P ballot question was on the June 2, 2009 ballot for voters in the City of Compton in Los Angeles County, where it was defeated.

If Measure P had been approved, it would have amended Section 500 of the Compton City Charter to increase the population threshold from 100,000 residents to 150,000 residents before the City Council could take action to increase the City districts from four to six.

Election results

Measure P
Result	Votes	Percentage
d No	1,342	59.0%
Yes	932	41.0%

These final election results are from the Los Angeles County election office.

External links

Suggest a link

Measure P on Smart Voter

v • d • e Local ballot measures in California

Counties	Alameda • Alpine • Amador • Butte • Calaveras • Colusa • Contra Costa • Del Norte • El Dorado • Fresno • Glenn • Humboldt • Imperial • Inyo • Kern • Kings • Lake • Lassen • Los Angeles • Madera • Marin • Mariposa • Mendocino • Merced • Modoc • Mono • Monterey • Napa • Nevada • Orange • Placer • Plumas • Riverside • Sacramento • San Benito • San Bernardino • San Diego • San Francisco • San Joaquin • San Luis Obispo • San Mateo • Santa Barbara • Santa Clara • Santa Cruz • Shasta • Sierra • Siskiyou • Solano • Sonoma • Stanislaus • Sutter • Tehama • Trinity • Tulare • Tuolumne • Ventura • Yolo • Yuba

Analysis	Laws governing local ballot measures in California • Ballot measure information on California county websites • Costs of administering local elections • Required approval rates for local California ballot measures

2013	March 5 • March 12 • April 2 • April 9 • May 7 • May 21 • June 4 • June 11

2012	February 7 • March 6 • March 13 • April 6 • April 10 • May 1 • May 8 • June 5 • July 10 • August 28 • September 18 • November 6

2011	January 25 • March 1 • March 8 • April 5 • April 12 • May 3 • June 7 • June 21 • July 12 • August 30 • November 8 • November 15 • November 22

2010	January 12 • February 2 • February 23 • March 2 • March 9 • April 13 • May 4 • May 25 • June 8 • June 15 • June 22 • July 13 • August 24 • August 31 • September 21 • November 2

2009	January 13 • February 24 • March 3 • March 10 • April 21 • May 5 • May 19 • June 2 • June 9 • June 16 • June 23 • June 30 • July 21 • August 4 • August 25 • August 28 • November 3 • November 17 • December 8 • December 15

2008	February 5 • March 4 • April 8 • June 3 • June 24 • July 22 • August 26 • November 4

2007	March 6 • May 7 • November 6

2006	March 7 • April 11 • May 2 • June 6 • November 7

2005	March 8 • April 5 • June 7 • October 4 • November 8 • December 6

2004	March 2 • November 2

2003	February 4

2002	November 5

1999	November 2

Political topics	Advisory votes • Binding arbitration • Business taxes • City charters • Election and voting laws • Gambling • Gann overrides • Hotel taxes • Incorporations • Immigration • Jurisdictional boundaries • Labor • Marijuana • Marijuana taxes • Mottos • Municipal bonds • Parcel taxes • Pensions • Project-Labor Agreements • Recall • Red light cameras • Rent control • Salaries of local officials • Sales taxes • School bonds • Term limits • Utility user taxes • Vehicle registration taxes • Zoning and land use