Note: Ballotpedia will be read-only from 9pm CST on February 25-March 5 while Judgepedia is merged into Ballotpedia.
For status updates, visit
Ballotpedia's coverage of elections held on March 3, 2015, was limited. Select races were covered live, and all results will be added once the merger is complete.

Cutler-Orosi Unified School District bond proposition, Measure T (November 2010)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
School bonds
& taxes
Portal:School Bond and Tax Elections
Bond elections
All years and states
Property tax elections
All years and states
How voting works
State comparisons
County evaluations
Approval rates
A Cutler-Orosi Unified School District bond proposition, Measure T was on the November 2, 2010 ballot for voters in the Cutler-Orosi Unified School District in Fresno County and Tulare County. It was defeated.

Measure T asked voters if they would allow the Cutler-Orosi Unified School District to borrow $15 million. This would have increased property taxes in the Cutler-Orosi district on average $60 per year per $100,000 of assessed property value for a period of 25 years.[1]

A 55 percent supermajority vote was required for Measure T to be approved.

Election results

DefeateddMeasure T
County: Yes No
Votes  % Votes  %
Fresno County 57 74.55% 167 25.45%
Tulare County 812 53.14% 716 46.86%
Totals: 869 49.6% 883 50.4%
These election results are from the Fresno County elections office and the Tulare County elections office.

Text of measure

The question on the ballot:

Measure T: “To improve the quality of education, construct, modernize and renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms, and other school facilities; make health and safety improvements; update sports facilities ; improve student access to computers and modern technology; improvement to kitchen facilities; and construct a local gymnasium for school and community use; shall the Cutler-Orosi Joint Unified School District issue $15,000,000 in bonds, within legal interest rates, requiring a citizens’ oversight committee, annual financial audits, and no money for administrative salaries?”[2]

See also

External links

Suggest a link


  1. Valley Voice Newspaper, "Two Parel Tax, Bond Measures on Local ballot"
  2. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.