Florida Abortion, Amendment 6 (2012)
|Referred by:||Florida State Legislature|
The proposed measure would have prohibited the use of public funds for abortions except as required by federal law and to save the mother's life. Additionally, the measure stipulated that the state constitution cannot be interpreted to include broader rights to abortion than those contained in the United States Constitution.
The proposed measure required 60 percent voter approval for adoption.
- See also: 2012 ballot measure election results
|Florida Amendment 6|
These results are certified and final.
Results via the Florida Department of Election's website.
Text of the measure
The summary of the measure read as follows:
- This proposed amendment provides that public funds may not be expended for any abortion or for health-benefits coverage that includes coverage of abortion. This prohibition does not apply to an expenditure required by federal law, a case in which a woman suffers from a physical disorder, physical injury, or physical illness that would place her in danger of death unless an abortion is performed, or a case of rape or incest. This proposed amendment provides that the State Constitution may not be interpreted to create broader rights to an abortion than those contained in the United States Constitution. With respect to abortion, this proposed amendment overrules court decisions which conclude that the right of privacy under Article I, Section 23 of the State Constitution is broader in scope than that of the United States Constitution.
- The campaign to pass the measure was spearheaded by Say Yes on 6.
- The group Citizens for Protecting Taxpayers and Parental Rights came out in support of the amendment. Randy Armstrong, president of the group, said, "On one hand Florida state law honors the rights of parents by requiring a parent’s consent if their minor child should need medication as simple as an aspirin at school, or some other medical treatment. Parental consent is also required for even mildly invasive physical procedures like tattoos or body piercing. Yet, a full surgical procedure like an abortion, which can result in permanent health or psychological damage – or even death – to their minor child, is exempted from this requirement.When passed, this amendment will open a way for elected officials to pass future legislation requiring parental consent for minors seeking an abortion."
- Armstrong also said: " We are asking Florida voters to Say Yes on Amendment 6 to prohibit taxpayer dollars from paying for abortions. Let me be clear: this is not a call to deny access to abortion for anyone, but simply to say that a private act shouldn’t be a public expense – that taxpayers shouldn’t be forced to foot the bill for abortion in Florida."
- U.S. Senator Marco Rubio
- Speaker Designate Will Weatherford
- FL. Senator Anitere Flores
- Fl. Representatives Dennis Baxley and Rachel Burgin
- Fl. CFO Jeff Atwater
- Florida Farm Bureau
- Florida Baptist Convention
- Florida Family Action
- Florida Conference of Catholic Bishops
- Catholic Association of Latino Leaders
- Catholics Called 2 Witness
- Florida Right to Life
- Florida Council of Catholic Women
- Faith and Freedom Coalition
- Christian Family Coalition
- United Christians of Florida, Florida Eagle Forum
The group Vote No on 6 formed to oppose the amendment. Campaign manager Judith Selzer pointed out that if passed, Amendment 6 would allow politicians to interfere with a woman’s right to make decisions about her own reproductive health. "Every woman deserves to make her own personal decisions based on her values and her doctor’s advice without politicians interfering," Selzer said.
The following data was taken from the Florida Division of Elections campaign finance database. The following political action committees are campaigning against the measure.
|PAC||Amount raised||Amount spent|
|Vote No On 6||1,927,692.83||1,504,481.85|
Path to the ballot
On March 28, 2011 the Senate Judiciary Committee voted 4-2 in favor of the proposed measure. Previously, the proposal was approved by the Senate Health Regulation Committee following a 8-4 vote on March 14. On April 15 the Senate Rules Committee voted 9 to 3 in favor; sending the proposal to the Senate floor.
The House version, HJR 1179, of the proposed legislation was approved by the House on April 27 following a 82-35 vote. A day later, on April 28, the Senate voted 27-12 in favor of referring the measure to the ballot. However, the Senate amended the proposed legislation, therefore the measure must be approved by the House one last time. On May 4 the House approved the amended bill thus referring the bill to the ballot. The House voted 79-34.
The following is a timeline of events surrounding the measure:
|Vote||Mar. 28, 2011||The Senate Judiciary Committee voted 4-2 in favor of the proposed measure.|
|Vote||Apr. 15, 2011||The Senate Rules Committee voted 9 to 3 in favor.|
|Approval||Apr. 27, 2011||Proposed legislation was approved by the House following a 82-35 vote.|
|Approval||Apr. 28, 2011||The Senate voted 27-12 in favor of referring the measure to the ballot.|
|Final vote||May 4, 2011||Senate amended proposal, House had to approve bill before sending it to the ballot. The House voted 79-34 in favor.|
| By Eric Veram|
Ballot measure writer
|Email • Submit a link|
- SJR 1538 (status and summary) and (full text)
- HJR 1179 (status and summary) and (full text)
- Committee contributions at FollowTheMoney.org
- Say Yes on 6 campaign website
- Say Yes on 6 Facebook page
- Say Yes on 6 Twitter page
- Say Yes on 6 Youtube channel
- The Florida Independent,"Elections overhaul makes it harder to challenge 2012 ballot measures," July 7, 2011
- The Miami Herald,"Lawmakers ask voters to weigh in on abortion, taxes and more issues in 2012," May 11, 2011
- The Herald Tribune,"Legislature passes 7 ballot items for 2012," May 6, 2011
- News Service of Florida ,"House passes two pro-life measures, one goes to ballot," May 4, 2011
- Associated Press,"Fla. House voting on abortion-limiting bills," April 26, 2011
- ↑ Florida State Senate,"SJR 1538 full text," retrieved March 16, 2011
- ↑ Miami New Times,"Proposed State Amendment Would Deny Funding For Abortions For Rape and Incest Victims," March 14, 2011
- ↑ Florida Secretary of State, "PROHIBITION ON PUBLIC FUNDING OF ABORTIONS; CONSTRUCTION OF ABORTION RIGHTS", Retrieved August 21, 2012
- ↑ Florida Senate,"SJR 1538 vote history," retrieved April 18, 2011
- ↑ Sunshine State News,"'No Tax Funds for Abortion' Ballot Measure Heads to Senate Floor," April 15, 2011
- ↑ LifeNews.com,"Florida Legislature Approves Six Pro-Life Bills on Abortion," May 2, 2011
- ↑ Miami New Times,"Florida Senate Passes First Round of Anti-Abortion Bills," April 28, 2011
- ↑ The Palm Beach Post,"Legislature puts four amendments up for vote in 2012," May 5, 2011
- ↑ Florida State Senate,"HJR 1179 May 4 vote," May 4, 2011
State of Florida
|State executive officers||
Governor | Lieutenant Governor | Attorney General | Secretary of State | Chief Financial Officer | Commissioner of Education | Commissioner of Agriculture and Consumer Services | Commissioner of Insurance Regulation | Secretary of Environmental Protection | Director of Economic Opportunity | Chair of Public Service Commission |
Sunshine Law | Transparency Checklist | Government corruption reports | Transparency Legislation | Open Records procedures | Transparency Advocates | State budget | Taxpayer-funded lobbying associations |
List of Counties |
List of Cities |
List of School Districts |