Florida Hometown Democracy v. Browning

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Ballot law
BallotLaw final.png
State laws
Initiative law
Recall law
Statutory changes
Court cases
Lawsuit news
Ballot access rulings
Recent court cases
Petitioner access
Ballot title challenges
Superseding initiatives
Signature challenges
Laws governing
local ballot measures
Florida Hometown Democracy v. Browning was a lawsuit filed in the Florida Supreme Court by the Florida Hometown Democracy PAC against the state of Florida as represented by Florida Secretary of State Kurt Browning.[1]
Status: Upheld prior district court ruling that declared certain irregularities of the petition-check process and the signature revocation process were unconstitutional.

At stake was the fate of the Hometown Democracy Act, which did not appear on the November 2008 ballot because of mistakes by official state agencies, and possible unconstitutionality in the state's petition drive deadlines. It did, however, make it onto the 2010 ballot as the Florida Comprehensive Land Use Plans Initiative, Amendment 4. It was defeated.

The lawsuit was filed on June 11, 2008. It challenged the irregularities in the petition-checking process that stemmed from the fact that the state's voter database was not current, and some from the fact that different counties used different standards for determining whether a signature was valid or not. The lawsuit attacked the practice of disqualifying inactive voters from signing initiative petitions, and also petition signature revocation, the practice of letting voters remove their signatures after the petition has been filed.[2]

Lesley Blackner, head of the Hometown Democracy effort, said that Florida's February 1, 2008, deadline violates the U.S. Constitution. She said, "It deprives people of their right to associate politically. The state has got to stop this war against citizens’ right to amend their constitution."[3]

Ruling

On February 18, 2010, the Florida Supreme Court upheld a district court ruling that declared certain irregularities of the petition-check process and the signature revocation process were unconstitutional.[1]

For full details read the decision here.

Lawsuits challenging signature deadlines

Nader v. Brewer and Anderson v. Celebrezze are two other lawsuits challenging ballot access deadlines.

See also

External links

BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Suggest a link

References