Does your state lean blue or lean red? Check out our new report, highlighting partisan control of state government from 1992-2013.
Goddard Clausen Strategic Advocacy
Contents |
Ballot measure campaigns
2010
Legend:
|
In 2010, Goddard Clausen Strategic Advocacy consulted for five of the statewide propositions on the California ballot.
- Proposition 17: $549,667[2]
- Proposition 20: $549,470
- Proposition 23: $230,000[3]
- Proposition 24: $290,000
- Proposition 26: $158,750
2008
- California Proposition 11 (2008). Goddard Clausen worked on the winning side, which was the "yes" side.[4]
- Maine Repeal Dirigo Tax Referendum (2008). Goddard Clausen worked on the winning side, which was the tax-repeal side.[4]
2007
- Oregon Ballot Measure 50 (2007). Goddard Clausen worked on the winning side, which was the "no" side.[4]
2006
- California Proposition 82 (2006). Goddard Clausen worked on the winning side, which was the "no" side.[4]
- California Proposition 89 (2006). Goddard Clausen worked on the winning side, which was the "no" side.[4]
- Missouri Healthy Future Trust Fund Act, Amendment 3 (2006). Goddard Clausen worked on the winning side, which was the "no" side.[4]
2004
- California Proposition 64 (2004). Goddard Clausen worked on the winning side, which was the "yes" side.[4]
2000
- California Proposition 30 (2000). Goddard Clausen worked on the winning side, which was the "no" side.[4]
- California Proposition 31 (2000). Goddard Clausen worked on the winning side, which was the "no" side.[4]
"Harry and Louise"
|
|
Goddard Clausen is responsible for the famous (or infamous, depending on one's perspective) "Harry and Louise" television ad. On their website, Goddard Clausen describes its role in the "Harry and Louise" ad as "National advocacy advertising didn't just happen. It was invented. And we invented it in the early ‘90's with the fictional couple – “Harry and Louise” – created to give a clear, unified voice to those who opposed President Clinton's sweeping health care proposal. The unique campaign, managed by Goddard Claussen, caught the attention of the media, the White House and the American people. A year later, “Harry and Louise” earned a spot on Advertising Age's prestigious “Marketing 100” and was named the Best Public Policy Campaign by the American Association of Political Consultants. It's widely credited as being the key factor in defeating the Clinton Health Plan."[5]
See also
- California political consultants
- Vendors and consultants to California's 2010 ballot proposition campaigns
External links
References
- ↑ Goddard Clausen website
- ↑ Expenditure details for "Yes on Proposition 17" campaign
- ↑ [http://cal-access.ss.ca.gov/PDFGen/pdfgen.prg?filingid=1507808&amendid=0 Recipient Committee Campaign Statement
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 Goddard Clausen ballot measure portfolio
- ↑ Goddard Clausen portfolio