Healdsburg Unified School District Measure H (June 2008)

From Ballotpedia

Healdsburg Unified School District Measure H appeared on the June 3, 2008 ballot in Sonoma County, California, where it failed. To pass, it needed the approval of 67% of the district's voters. The measure would have imposed a parcel tax of $88.00 for seven years starting July 1, 2008.

The ballot language read, "To benefit all of the students living in the communities served by Healdsburg High School by maintaining small class sizes, updating technology and providing for necessary educational programs and materials, shall the Healdsburg Unified School District be authorized to levy an annual tax of $88 per taxable parcel for seven years only, beginning July 1, 2008, with annual audits and offering an exemption for parcels owned and occupied by persons 65 or over?"

See also

• California 2008 local ballot measures

References

	v • d • e State of California Sacramento (capital)
Ballot Measures	History of I&R | City and county ballot initiatives | School district bond issues | Laws governing initiatives | Recall process |
Ballot measures by year	1912 • 1914 • 1916 • 1920 • 1922 • 1978 • 1980 • 1982 • 1984 • 1986 • 1988 • 1990 • 1992 • 1993 • 1994 • 1996 • 1998 • 2000 • 2002 • 2003 • 2004 • 2005 • 2006 • 2006 (local) • 2007 • 2008 • 2008 (local) • 2009 • 2009 (local) • 2010
Government	California State Constitution | Governor | Attorney General | Secretary of State | State assembly | State senate |
Elections	Recalls | Vote fraud | 2010 elections |
Judiciary	California Supreme Court | Courts of Appeal | Superior Courts | District Courts | Judicial selection in California | Judicial News |
Transparency Topics	Public Records Act | Transparency Checklist | Government corruption reports | Transparency Legislation | Open Records procedures | Transparency Advocates | State budget | Taxpayer-funded lobbying associations |
Divisions	State | List of counties | List of Cities | List of School Districts, A - L | List of School Districts, M - Y | Evaluation of county websites | Evaluation of city websites | Evaluation of township websites | Evaluation of school district websites |