Vote button trans.png
April's Project of the Month
It's spring time. It's primary election season!
Click here to find all the information you'll need to cast your ballot.

Lake Tahoe Unified School District bond proposition, Measure A (June 2008)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
School bonds
& taxes
Portal:School Bond and Tax Elections
Bond elections
All years and states
Property tax elections
All years and states
How voting works
State comparisons
County evaluations
Approval rates
A Lake Tahoe Unified School District bond proposition, Measure A ballot question was on the June 3, 2008 ballot for voters in the Lake Tahoe Unified School District in El Dorado County, California, where it was defeated.

If Measure A had been approved, it would have authorized the school district to borrow $87 million. To repay this, the district would have levied a tax of 3.87 cents per $100 of assessed value of a person's property, or $38.70 per $100,000.[1]

After Measure A's defeat, the Lake Tahoe school board voted to put Measure G on the November 4, 2008 ballot. Measure G asked for $64.5 million. It was approved with 59.42% of the vote.

A 55% supermajority vote was required for approval.

Election results

Measure A
Defeatedd No2,53547.72%
Yes 2,777 52.28%
These final, certified, election results are from the El Dorado County elections office.

Ballot question

The question on the ballot:

This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.

Measure A: "To provide safe, secure local schools by replacing outdated portables, electrical, emergency and lighting systems, aging plumbing/restrooms; improving classrooms, technology and elementary school libraries; creating new career and technology education classrooms; upgrading physical education and athletic facilities; and qualifying for $11 Million Dollars in state matching funds, shall Lake Tahoe Unified School District issue $87 Million in bonds at legal interest rates, with annual financial audits, citizens' oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?"

See also

External links