Vote button trans.png
April's Project of the Month
It's spring time. It's primary election season!
Click here to find all the information you'll need to cast your ballot.




Los Altos School District parcel tax, Measure E (May 2011)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
School bonds
& taxes
Portal:School Bond and Tax Elections
Bond elections
2014201320122011
201020092008
All years and states
Property tax elections
2014201320122011
201020092008
All years and states
How voting works
Other
State comparisons
County evaluations
Approval rates
A Los Altos School District parcel tax, Measure E ballot question was on the May 3, 2011 ballot for voters in the Los Altos School District in Santa Clara County, where it was approved.[1]

Measure E will levy a parcel tax of $193 per parcel for six years. The $193 tax will be in addition to an existing $597 parcel tax, and will bring the total in annual parcel taxes going to the district to $790/parcel.[2] The $193 tax is expected to generate $2.3 million a year in additional revenue for the school district.[2]

A 2/3rds supermajority vote was required for approval.

Election results

Measure E
Result Votes Percentage
Approveda Yes 9,187 67.06%
No 4,512 32.94%


Election results from the Santa Clara County elections office as of May 10.

Support

Supporters

"Keep Los Altos Schools Strong (KLASS)" was a group of Measure E supporters. Jay Gill was a leader with KLASS. He said, "We have to have the community involved with the parcel tax, we have to have the parents involved with donations and the teachers with concessions."[3]

Randy Kenyon is the assistant superintendent of business services for the Los Altos School District. He said that the district hired attorneys to write the ballot language for Measure E, pollsters to collect voter rolls to target voters through phone banks, and consultants to create messages for pamphlets about Measure E. According to Kenyon, "We need to go out to the community. That has helped spawn a little cottage industry of experts that help the districts make it through these elections. That’s not our business, running an election. I can’t imagine someone not using campaign consultants."[4]

Specifically, the school district hired these consultants and paid them:

Opposition

Opponents

"LASD Taxpayers for Reform" was a group of Measure E opponents.[3]

Los Altos Hills resident Courtenay C. Corrigan is a member of LASD Taxpayers for Reform. She said, "The Los Altos School District has a vehicle for raising funds – the Los Altos Educational Foundation. We already as citizens pay money to keep these schools running."[3]

In the official voter pamphlet, Measure E opponents argued, "Our assessed property values have increased at a rate of over 8% annually for the last 10 years while student enrollment in the school district has only grown at 1% per year."

Ronald Haley opposed the tax. He wrote, "The proposed tax size was chosen via polling, not by perceived need. By 2016, LASD will still have an $8 million cumulative deficit. How do they intend to close this gap? They won’t say! Eighty-five percent of the budget is salaries and benefits. When was the last time that this union gave anything back? Immediately following passage of the last parcel tax, they closed a school. Superintendent Baier has refused to rule out school closings as a possible solution, yet he can’t, or won’t, tell us how he intends to close the gap."[6]

Bullis Charter School

Leaders with the Bullis Charter School, a public charter in the Los Altos School District, while not taking an official position in opposition to Measure E, argued that if Measure E passes, an existing funding discrepancy between the charter and non-charter schools within the district would expand. Non-charter schools in the district get about $10,000/year per student from property taxes, while the Bullis Charter School gets somewhat more than $6,000 per student, for a funding gap of $3,739 per student.

With the approval of Measure E, the funding gap will widen from $3,739 per student to $4,292 per student, according to a study commissioned by Bullis.[2]

According to Ken Moore, chairman of the Bullis School Board, "This is just another step in a pattern of inequity."[2]

Wanny Hersey, the principal of Bullis Charter School, sent a letter about Measure E to parents at Bullis in which he said, "Any argument that passing Measure E would benefit [our] students by providing them with more space is highly suspect. The proposed parcel tax increase asks [our] families to pay additional taxes while simultaneously shortchanging them."[2]

Text of measure

English

The question on the ballot:

This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.

MEASURE E: To protect excellent education in Los Altos elementary and Junior high schools; preserve core academic programs in reading, writing, math and science; retain highly qualified teachers; and provide books and classroom materials, shall Los Altos School District levy an annual education parcel tax of $193 per parcel for six years, with independent citizen oversight, no funds for administrators’ salaries, an exemption for senior citizens, and al funds used only for support of local elementary and junior high schools?

En Espanol

The question on the ballot:

This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.

MEASURE E: A fin de proteger la excelente educación en las escuelas primarias e intermedias de Los Altos; preservar los programas académicos principales en lectura, redacción, matemáticas y ciencias; retener a maestros altamente calificados; y proporcionar libros y materiales para las aulas, ¿Debe el Distrito Escolar de Los Altos gravar un impuesto anual a la parcela para educación de $193 por parcela durante seis años, con supervisión ciudadana independiente, sin fondos para salarios de administradores, con una exención para los ciudadanos de la tercera edad, y que todos los fondos se utilicen únicamente para apoyar a las escuelas primarias e intermedias locales?

See also

External links

References