Maine Clearcutting Permits, Question 2 (2000)
The Maine Clearcutting Permits Initiative, also known as Question 2, was on the November 7, 2000 ballot in Maine as an indirect initiated state statute, where it was defeated. The act would have required permits for clearcutting practices that would have limits based on the potential ecological harm done by the practice in a specific area.
|Maine Question 2 (2000)|
Text of measure
The language appeared on the ballot as:
Do you favor requiring landowners to obtain a permit for all clear-cuts and defining cutting levels for lands subject to the Tree Growth Tax Law? 
The following description of the intent and content of this measure was provided in the Maine Citizen's Guide to the Referendum Election:
This initiative amends the existing Forest Practices Act by adding provisions that will require owners of timberland to obtain a permit from the Maine Forest Service prior to undertaking any cutting that would result in a clear-cut, which is a term defined in existing law. Permits would be issued based on a finding that the clear-cut is silviculturally justified, that there are no reasonable alternatives to the proposed clear-cut and that the clear-cutting activity will not cause any undue adverse ecological damage.
The Act also prohibits landowners enrolled under the Maine Tree Growth Tax Law from cutting trees on their land at a rate that exceeds the average annual growth rate of each species during the past ten years.
Finally, the Act authorizes the appointment by the Governor of a Maine Council on Sustainable Forest Management to establish rules, within six months, governing the issuance of permits for clear-cutting and implementation of the new restrictions on timber cutting by landowners enrolled under the Maine Tree Growth Tax Law.
If approved, this Act would take effect 30 days after the proclamation of the vote.
A "YES" vote is in favor of the initiative and approves the legislation.
A "NO" vote is in opposition to the initiative and disapproves the legislation. 
Path to the ballot
A total of 43,745 petition signatures were submitted to place this measure before the state legislature. The legislature failed to enact the measure on April 11, 2000, when both chambers accepted the "Majority Ought Not to Pass Report." Because Maine has a system of indirect initiatives, the measure was referred to a popular vote of the electors.
- Maine 2000 ballot measures
- 2000 ballot measures
- List of Maine ballot measures
- History of Initiative & Referendum in Maine
- Maine Citizen's Guide to the Referendum Election, Tuesday, November 7, 2000 from Maine Secretary of State
- Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library, Votes on Initiated Bills 1980-
- Bangor Daily News, "No on Question 2," October 31, 2000
- Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library, "Votes on Initiated Bills 1980-," accessed May 5, 2014
- Maine Secretary of State, Division of Elections, "Maine Citizen's Guide to the Referendum Election, Tuesday, November 7, 2000," accessed May 5, 2014
- Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.
- State of Maine Proclamation, "An Act Regarding Forests Practices to be submitted to the people," May 17, 2000
State of Maine
|State executive officers||
Governor | Attorney General | Secretary of State | Treasurer | State Auditor | Commissioner of Education | Superintendent of Insurance | Commissioner of Agriculture | Commissioner of Conservation | Commissioner of Labor | Chairman of Public Utilities |